Literature DB >> 22274994

A simple technique for early in vivo electroporation of E1 chick embryos.

Charmaine Y Brown1, Dae Seok Eom, Smita Amarnath, Seema Agarwala.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The amenability of the chick embryo to a variety of manipulations has made it an ideal experimental model organism for over 100 years. The ability to manipulate gene function via in ovo electroporations has further revolutionized its value as an experimental model in the last 15 years. Although in ovo electroporations are simple to conduct in embryos ≥ E2, in ovo electroporations at early E1 stages have proven to be technically challenging due to the tissue damage and embryonic lethality such electroporations produce. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Here we report our success with in vivo microelectroporations of E1 embryos as young as Hamburger-Hamilton Stage 4 (HH4). We provide evidence that such electroporations can be varied in size and can be spatially targeted. They cause minimal disruption of tissue-size, 3-dimensional morphology, cell survival, proliferation, and cell-fate specification. Our paradigm is easily adapted to a variety of experimental conditions since it does not depend upon the presence of a lumen to enclose the DNA solution during electroporation. It is thus compatible with the in vivo examination of E1 morphogenetic events (e.g., neural tube closure) where preservation of 3-dimensional morphology is critical.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22274994      PMCID: PMC3423080          DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.23747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  17 in total

Review 1.  'Shocking' developments in chick embryology: electroporation and in ovo gene expression.

Authors:  N Itasaki; S Bel-Vialar; R Krumlauf
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Spatially and temporally controlled electroporation of early chick embryos.

Authors:  Octavian Voiculescu; Costis Papanayotou; Claudio D Stern
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Method for electroporation for the early chick embryo.

Authors:  Jun Hatakeyama; Kenji Shimamura
Journal:  Dev Growth Differ       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.053

4.  Enhancer analysis by chicken embryo electroporation with aid of genome comparison.

Authors:  Masanori Uchikawa
Journal:  Dev Growth Differ       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.053

5.  Bone morphogenetic proteins regulate neural tube closure by interacting with the apicobasal polarity pathway.

Authors:  Dae Seok Eom; Smita Amarnath; Jennifer L Fogel; Seema Agarwala
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo.

Authors:  V HAMBURGER; H L HAMILTON
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 1.804

7.  Sonic hedgehog control of size and shape in midbrain pattern formation.

Authors:  S Agarwala; T A Sanders; C W Ragsdale
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Embryological and genetic manipulation of chick development.

Authors:  Laura S Gammill; Catherine E Krull
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

9.  Gene manipulation of chick embryos in vitro, early chick culture, and long survival in transplanted eggs.

Authors:  Jun Tanaka; Hidekiyo Harada; Kodai Ito; Toshihiko Ogura; Harukazu Nakamura
Journal:  Dev Growth Differ       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.053

10.  Regulation of ventral midbrain patterning by Hedgehog signaling.

Authors:  Roy D Bayly; Minhtran Ngo; Galina V Aglyamova; Seema Agarwala
Journal:  Development       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cell-cycle-dependent TGFβ-BMP antagonism regulates neural tube closure by modulating tight junctions.

Authors:  Smita Amarnath; Seema Agarwala
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  A novel role for FOXA2 and SHH in organizing midbrain signaling centers.

Authors:  Roy D Bayly; Charmaine Y Brown; Seema Agarwala
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Bone morphogenetic proteins regulate hinge point formation during neural tube closure by dynamic modulation of apicobasal polarity.

Authors:  Dae Seok Eom; Smita Amarnath; Jennifer L Fogel; Seema Agarwala
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-08-03

4.  A technique to increase accessibility to late-stage chick embryos for in ovo manipulations.

Authors:  James Spurlin; Peter Lwigale
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.780

5.  Constitutively active Notch1 converts cranial neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme to perivascular cells in vivo.

Authors:  Sophie R Miller; Surangi N Perera; Clare V H Baker
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.422

6.  Sympathetic neurons and chromaffin cells share a common progenitor in the neural crest in vivo.

Authors:  Stella Shtukmaster; Marie Catherine Schier; Katrin Huber; Shlomo Krispin; Chaya Kalcheim; Klaus Unsicker
Journal:  Neural Dev       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.842

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.