Literature DB >> 22273412

Parents' perceptions of their infants' participation in randomized controlled trials.

Kim Cartwright1, Liam Mahoney, Susan Ayers, Heike Rabe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore parents' perceptions of their infants' participation in randomized control trials (RCTs) and the implications of the RCT for their infant and themselves.
DESIGN: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews.
SETTING: Participants were identified from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) clinical registers and from responses to an advertisement put on the website of United Kingdom special care baby charity, BLISS. Interviews were conducted with parents face-to-face in their homes or over the telephone. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen parents of 12 infants born prematurely or with complications at full term and who had participated in one of three RCTs while receiving intensive care in one of seven NICUs.
METHODS: Interviews were audio-taped or digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using systematic thematic analysis using WinMax qualitative software.
RESULTS: Five main themes emerged from the data. The themes were parents' immediate reactions to being approached about RCT enrollment, interactions between parents and clinicians upon the approach of enrollment and during the RCT, making the decision to enroll their infants, implications of the RCT for parents, and effects of the RCT on the infants.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be encouraged to approach parents about enrollment of their infants in clinical research given that parents reported mostly positive experiences related to this participation. However, appropriate measures should be taken to ensure that the individual needs of parents are being met throughout the entire research process from enrollment to follow-up.
© 2011 AWHONN, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22273412     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01276.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  8 in total

1.  Fragile X syndrome clinical trials: exploring parental decision-making.

Authors:  C S D'Amanda; H L Peay; A C Wheeler; E Turbitt; B B Biesecker
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2019-02-12

2.  A prospective study of maternal preference for indomethacin prophylaxis versus symptomatic treatment of a patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.

Authors:  Khalid AlFaleh; Eman Alluwaimi; Ahlam AlOsaimi; Sheikha Alrajebah; Bashayer AlOtaibi; Fatima AlRasheed; Turki AlKharfi; Bosco Paes
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  Quality of life in parents of preterm infants in a randomized nutritional intervention trial.

Authors:  Trond Nordheim; Tone Rustøen; Per O Iversen; Britt Nakstad
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Women's experiences of participating in a randomised trial comparing alternative policies for timing of cord clamping at very preterm birth: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Lucy Bradshaw; Alexandra Sawyer; Eleanor Mitchell; Lindsay Armstrong-Buisseret; Susan Ayers; Lelia Duley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Parental Factors Associated With the Decision to Participate in a Neonatal Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Elliott Mark Weiss; Aleksandra E Olszewski; Katherine F Guttmann; Brooke E Magnus; Sijia Li; Anita R Shah; Sandra E Juul; Yvonne W Wu; Kaashif A Ahmad; Ellen Bendel-Stenzel; Natalia A Isaza; Andrea L Lampland; Amit M Mathur; Rakesh Rao; David Riley; David G Russell; Zeynep N I Salih; Carrie B Torr; Joern-Hendrik Weitkamp; Uchenna E Anani; Taeun Chang; Juanita Dudley; John Flibotte; Erin M Havrilla; Charmaine M Kathen; Alexandra C O'Kane; Krystle Perez; Brenda J Stanley; Benjamin S Wilfond; Seema K Shah
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 6.  Informed consent for neonatal trials: practical points to consider and a check list.

Authors:  Beate Aurich; Eric Vermeulen; Valéry Elie; Mariette H E Driessens; Christine Kubiak; Donato Bonifazi; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 7.  Motivations of children and their parents to participate in drug research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Krista Tromp; C Michel Zwaan; Suzanne van de Vathorst
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  'We knew it was a totally at random thing': parents' experiences of being part of a neonatal trial.

Authors:  Merryl Harvey; Phumza Nongena; David Edwards; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.