Literature DB >> 22273057

Measuring preferred role orientations for patients and providers in veterans administration and university general medicine clinics.

Peter J Kaboli1, Austin S Baldwin, Michael S Henderson, Areef Ishani, Jamie A Cvengros, Alan J Christensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Congruence between patients' and providers' preferred healthcare role orientations has been shown to be important for improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Thus, it is important to know how different patient and provider populations might vary in preferred role orientations.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the range of role orientation preferences among patients and providers in two different general medicine clinic populations.
METHODS: Role orientation preferences of patients (n = 319) and providers (n = 151) in six Veterans Administration (VA) primary care clinics and two university-based primary care clinics were measured in a cross sectional survey using the 9-item Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) sharing subscale among patients and providers.
RESULTS: VA patients had lower mean PPOS scores (i.e. more provider-centered role preference) than the university clinic patients (31.2 vs 39.7, respectively; p < 0.001). The difference remained significant even after adjusting for age, sex, and education. VA and university clinic providers had similar mean PPOS scores (41.5 vs 42.6, respectively; p = 0.27). Greater differences were found in mean PPOS scores between VA patients and their providers (31.2 vs 41.5, respectively; p < 0.001) than university clinic patients and their providers (39.7 vs 42.6, respectively; p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: VA patients reported preferences for a more provider-centered role than university clinic patients and there was greater mean difference in preferred role orientations between VA patients and their providers than between university clinic patients and their providers. Differences in preferred role orientations by patients and providers should be considered when designing clinical initiatives and research to improve patient care.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22273057     DOI: 10.2165/01312067-200902010-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  16 in total

1.  A systems approach to patient-centered care.

Authors:  Steven C Bergeson; John D Dean
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Patient-physician fit: an idea whose time has come.

Authors:  Edward Krupat
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions.

Authors:  Donald J Kiesler; Stephen M Auerbach
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-12-20

4.  Patient-by-treatment context interaction in chronic disease: a conceptual framework for the study of patient adherence.

Authors:  A J Christensen
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Patient-centered care for better patient adherence.

Authors:  R Lowes
Journal:  Fam Pract Manag       Date:  1998-03

6.  Preferences for medical collaboration: patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Kristina H Jahng; Leslie R Martin; Carol E Golin; M Robin DiMatteo
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-06

7.  Matching patients and practitioners based on beliefs about care: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Edward Krupat; John Hsu; Julie Irish; Julie A Schmittdiel; Joe Selby
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Beliefs about control in the physician-patient relationship: effect on communication in medical encounters.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Edward Krupat; Robert A Bell; Richard L Kravitz; Paul Haidet
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Patient-physician fit: an exploratory study of a multidimensional instrument.

Authors:  Alan Schwartz; Memoona Hasnain; Arnold R Eiser; Elizabeth Lincoln; Arthur S Elstein
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.

Authors:  Wendy Levinson; Audiey Kao; Alma Kuby; Ronald A Thisted
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy of Patient Activation Interventions With or Without Financial Incentives to Promote Prescribing of Thiazides and Hypertension Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Peter J Kaboli; M Bryant Howren; Areef Ishani; Barry Carter; Alan J Christensen; Mark W Vander Weg
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.