Paul J Bröckelmann1,2, Helen Goergen1,2, Ulrich Keller3, Julia Meissner4, Rainer Ordemann5, Teresa V Halbsguth6, Stephanie Sasse1,2, Martin Sökler7, Andrea Kerkhoff8, Stephan Mathas9, Andreas Hüttmann10, Matthias Bormann11, Andreas Zimmermann12, Jasmin Mettler13, Michael Fuchs1,2, Bastian von Tresckow1,2, Christian Baues2,14, Andreas Rosenwald15, Wolfram Klapper16, Carsten Kobe2,13, Peter Borchmann1,2, Andreas Engert1,2. 1. Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 2. German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany. 3. Klinikum Rechts der Isar der TU München, Internal Medicine III, Munich, Germany. 4. Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 6. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine II, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. 7. University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 8. Medizinische Klinik A, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany. 9. Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany. 10. Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany. 11. Medical Department I, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany. 12. Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 13. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 14. Department of Radiooncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 15. Institute of Pathology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany. 16. Department of Hematopathology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Abstract
Importance: In early-stage unfavorable classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), conventional therapy induces high cure rates but also relevant acute and long-term toxic effects. Nivolumab is well tolerated and highly effective in relapsed/refractory cHL but has not been adequately studied in first-line treatment of early-stage cHL. The NIVAHL trial evaluated nivolumab in this setting with the aim to develop a highly effective yet tolerable systemic therapy to ultimately mitigate morbidity in patients who survive cHL. Objective: To evaluate efficacy of 2 experimental nivolumab-based first-line treatment strategies in patients with early-stage unfavorable cHL. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 randomized clinical trial, open between April 2017 and October 2018. The trial took place at 35 trial centers across Germany, ranging from academic centers to private offices. Eligibility was defined by age 18 to 60 years, cHL confirmed by expert pathology review, early-stage unfavorable disease by German Hodgkin Study Group criteria (stage I to II with risk factor[s]), and absence of serious concomitant disease or organ dysfunction. Among 110 enrolled patients, 109 were eligible. Interventions: Systemic therapy, per random assignment (1:1) to either concomitant treatment with 4 cycles of nivolumab and doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N-AVD) or sequential treatment with 4 doses of nivolumab, 2 cycles of N-AVD, and 2 cycles of AVD at standard doses, followed by 30-Gy involved-site radiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Complete remission (CR) rate after study treatment, aiming at excluding a CR rate of 80% or lower via a 2-sided 95% CI for each treatment group. Results: Of 109 patients included in this study, 65 (59.6%) were women, and the median (range) age was 27 (18-60) years. At interim staging after 2 cycles of N-AVD or 4 doses of nivolumab monotherapy, 54 of 54 (100%) and 49 of 51 (96%) response-eligible patients, respectively, achieved an objective response, with CR in 47 (87%) and 26 (51%) patients, respectively. Among 101 patients eligible for primary end point analysis, 46 of 51 (90%; 95% CI, 79%-97%) patients receiving concomitant therapy and 47 of 50 (94%; 95% CI, 84%-99%) patients receiving sequential therapy achieved CR after study treatment. With a median follow-up of 13 months, 12-month progression-free survival was 100% for patients receiving concomitant treatment and 98% (95% CI, 95%-100%) for patients receiving sequential therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: Both strategies combining nivolumab and AVD are feasible and resulted in high remission rates. Despite narrowly missing the efficacy benchmark in the concomitant group, the excellent 12-month progression-free survival and the unexpectedly high CR rate after 4 doses of nivolumab monotherapy warrant further evaluation of this approach in the first-line treatment of patients with early-stage cHL. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03004833.
RCT Entities:
Importance: In early-stage unfavorable classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), conventional therapy induces high cure rates but also relevant acute and long-term toxic effects. Nivolumab is well tolerated and highly effective in relapsed/refractory cHL but has not been adequately studied in first-line treatment of early-stage cHL. The NIVAHL trial evaluated nivolumab in this setting with the aim to develop a highly effective yet tolerable systemic therapy to ultimately mitigate morbidity in patients who survive cHL. Objective: To evaluate efficacy of 2 experimental nivolumab-based first-line treatment strategies in patients with early-stage unfavorable cHL. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 randomized clinical trial, open between April 2017 and October 2018. The trial took place at 35 trial centers across Germany, ranging from academic centers to private offices. Eligibility was defined by age 18 to 60 years, cHL confirmed by expert pathology review, early-stage unfavorable disease by German Hodgkin Study Group criteria (stage I to II with risk factor[s]), and absence of serious concomitant disease or organ dysfunction. Among 110 enrolled patients, 109 were eligible. Interventions: Systemic therapy, per random assignment (1:1) to either concomitant treatment with 4 cycles of nivolumab and doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N-AVD) or sequential treatment with 4 doses of nivolumab, 2 cycles of N-AVD, and 2 cycles of AVD at standard doses, followed by 30-Gy involved-site radiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Complete remission (CR) rate after study treatment, aiming at excluding a CR rate of 80% or lower via a 2-sided 95% CI for each treatment group. Results: Of 109 patients included in this study, 65 (59.6%) were women, and the median (range) age was 27 (18-60) years. At interim staging after 2 cycles of N-AVD or 4 doses of nivolumab monotherapy, 54 of 54 (100%) and 49 of 51 (96%) response-eligible patients, respectively, achieved an objective response, with CR in 47 (87%) and 26 (51%) patients, respectively. Among 101 patients eligible for primary end point analysis, 46 of 51 (90%; 95% CI, 79%-97%) patients receiving concomitant therapy and 47 of 50 (94%; 95% CI, 84%-99%) patients receiving sequential therapy achieved CR after study treatment. With a median follow-up of 13 months, 12-month progression-free survival was 100% for patients receiving concomitant treatment and 98% (95% CI, 95%-100%) for patients receiving sequential therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: Both strategies combining nivolumab and AVD are feasible and resulted in high remission rates. Despite narrowly missing the efficacy benchmark in the concomitant group, the excellent 12-month progression-free survival and the unexpectedly high CR rate after 4 doses of nivolumab monotherapy warrant further evaluation of this approach in the first-line treatment of patients with early-stage cHL. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03004833.
Authors: Michael Schaapveld; Berthe M P Aleman; Anna M van Eggermond; Cécile P M Janus; Augustinus D G Krol; Richard W M van der Maazen; Judith Roesink; John M M Raemaekers; Jan Paul de Boer; Josée M Zijlstra; Gustaaf W van Imhoff; Eefke J Petersen; Philip M P Poortmans; Max Beijert; Marnix L Lybeert; Ina Mulder; Otto Visser; Marieke W J Louwman; Inge M Krul; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Flora E van Leeuwen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bastian von Tresckow; Annette Plütschow; Michael Fuchs; Beate Klimm; Jana Markova; Andreas Lohri; Zdenek Kral; Richard Greil; Max S Topp; Julia Meissner; Josée M Zijlstra; Martin Soekler; Harald Stein; Hans T Eich; Rolf P Mueller; Volker Diehl; Peter Borchmann; Andreas Engert Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Radhakrishnan Ramchandren; Eva Domingo-Domènech; Antonio Rueda; Marek Trněný; Tatyana A Feldman; Hun Ju Lee; Mariano Provencio; Christian Sillaber; Jonathon B Cohen; Kerry J Savage; Wolfgang Willenbacher; Azra H Ligon; Jing Ouyang; Robert Redd; Scott J Rodig; Margaret A Shipp; Mariana Sacchi; Anne Sumbul; Philippe Armand; Stephen M Ansell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lesley Seymour; Jan Bogaerts; Andrea Perrone; Robert Ford; Lawrence H Schwartz; Sumithra Mandrekar; Nancy U Lin; Saskia Litière; Janet Dancey; Alice Chen; F Stephen Hodi; Patrick Therasse; Otto S Hoekstra; Lalitha K Shankar; Jedd D Wolchok; Marcus Ballinger; Caroline Caramella; Elisabeth G E de Vries Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; Stephen Ansell; Larry Schwartz; Leo I Gordon; Ranjana Advani; Heather A Jacene; Axel Hoos; Sally F Barrington; Philippe Armand Journal: Blood Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Anas Younes; Armando Santoro; Margaret Shipp; Pier Luigi Zinzani; John M Timmerman; Stephen Ansell; Philippe Armand; Michelle Fanale; Voravit Ratanatharathorn; John Kuruvilla; Jonathon B Cohen; Graham Collins; Kerry J Savage; Marek Trneny; Kazunobu Kato; Benedetto Farsaci; Susan M Parker; Scott Rodig; Margaretha G M Roemer; Azra H Ligon; Andreas Engert Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Philippe Armand; Andreas Engert; Anas Younes; Michelle Fanale; Armando Santoro; Pier Luigi Zinzani; John M Timmerman; Graham P Collins; Radhakrishnan Ramchandren; Jonathon B Cohen; Jan Paul De Boer; John Kuruvilla; Kerry J Savage; Marek Trneny; Margaret A Shipp; Kazunobu Kato; Anne Sumbul; Benedetto Farsaci; Stephen M Ansell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alex F Herrera; Joycelynne Palmer; Vikram Adhikarla; Dave Yamauchi; Erasmus K Poku; James Bading; Paul Yazaki; Savita Dandapani; Matthew Mei; Robert Chen; Thai Cao; Nicole Karras; Pamela McTague; Auayporn Nademanee; Leslie Popplewell; Firoozeh Sahebi; John E Shively; Jennifer Simpson; D Lynne Smith; Joo Song; Ricardo Spielberger; Ni-Chun Tsai; Sandra H Thomas; Stephen J Forman; David Colcher; Anna M Wu; Jeffrey Wong; Eileen Smith Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2021-12-14
Authors: Pamela B Allen; Hatice Savas; Andrew M Evens; Ranjana H Advani; Brett Palmer; Barbara Pro; Reem Karmali; Eric Mou; Jeffrey Bearden; Gary Dillehay; Robert A Bayer; Robert M Eisner; Joan S Chmiel; Kaitlyn O'Shea; Leo I Gordon; Jane N Winter Journal: Blood Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 25.476