Literature DB >> 22270736

Vertebroplasty using transoral approach in painful malignant involvement of the second cervical vertebra (C2): a single-institution series of 25 patients.

Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti1, Antonio Manca, Filippo Montemurro, Sean Tutton, Gabriele Chiara, Massimo Battistella, Maurizio Savojardo, Stefano Marcia, Salvatore Masala, Daniele Regge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive procedure demonstrated to be safe and effective in the treatment of painful osteoporotic and malignancy related fractures when performed in the thoracolumbar spine. Multiple randomized and nonrandomized reports have demonstrated its effectiveness. Conversely, transoral vertebroplasty (TOV) to treat the second cervical vertebra (C2) has been described in only a few case reports.
OBJECTIVES: Prospective evaluation of clinical results of TOV performed in malignant painful osteolytic lesions of C2. STUDY
DESIGN: TOV was performed in 25 consecutive patients suffering from high-grade cervical pain due to malignant involvement of C2 who failed conservative therapies and did not have surgical indications. Follow-up was prospectively evaluated with clinical interviews in all patients. The Internal Review Board approved this study.
SETTING: Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment
METHODS: Twenty-five patients (16 women and 9 men; mean age 59.3 ± 11.5) suffering from a painful malignant involvement of C2 who did not respond to conventional therapies and did not have surgical indications, underwent TOV for pain palliation. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia with combined digital fluoroscopy and computed tomography guidance. After a beveled vertebroplasty needle was manually advanced up to the posterior odontoid wall, bone cement was injected under continuous digital fluoroscopic control. Patients were discharged from the hospital the next procedural day. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, analgesic requirement, and use of external cervical cast support were used for evaluating efficacy. The main end point was safety and efficacy at day 15 after the procedure. Furthermore, all the patients were scheduled to be followed-up at months one, 3, and 6, and every 6 months thereafter.
RESULTS: The median pretreatment VAS of 8 (range 5-10) significantly dropped (P < 0.0001) to 0 (range 0-10), with 20 patients (80%) achieving complete pain relief at day 15 after TOV. Differences in pre- and post-treatment analgesic therapy were significant (P < 0.001). Twenty-three patients no longer used a cervical cast after TOV (92%, P < 0.001). At median overall follow-up of 16 months (range 6-60 months), the projected proportion of patients free from worsening pain at 6, 12, and 24 months was 96%, 96% and 92% respectively. LIMITATIONS: A randomized study of only 25 patients.
CONCLUSION: TOV is safe, effective, and long-lasting in the treatment of cervical pain resulting from malignant involvement of C2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  8 in total

1.  Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for cervical spine metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rafael De la Garza-Ramos; Mario Benvenutti-Regato; Enrique Caro-Osorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-01-26

2.  Safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty: report of a large cohort and systematic review.

Authors:  Frédéric Clarençon; Robert Fahed; Evelyne Cormier; Idriss Haffaf; Jean-Philippe Spano; Eimad Shotar; Kévin Premat; Raphael Bonaccorsi; Vincent Degos; Jacques Chiras
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Role and limitations of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the management of spinal metastases].

Authors:  M Akbar; M Eichler; S Hagmann; B Lehner; S Hemmer; C Kasperk; B Wiedenhöfer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Vertebral Augmentation Involving Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty for Cancer-Related Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-05-01

5.  Stabilization of metastatic lesions affecting the second cervical vertebra.

Authors:  Joseph F Baker; Asseer Shafqat; Aiden Devitt; John P McCabe
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 6.  Metastasis Affecting Craniocervical Junction: Current Concepts and an Update on Surgical Management.

Authors:  Michael Denis O'Sullivan; Frank Lyons; Seamus Morris; Keith Synnott; Sudarshan Munigangaiah; Aidan Devitt
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-04-19

7.  Combined Percutaneous Kyphoplasty/Pediculoplasty by Posterolateral Transpedicular Approach for Painful Cervical Spine Metastases: A Single-Center Prospective Study.

Authors:  Yonghui Xia; Huan Zhai; Xinlei Wang; Yudong Wang; Bo Feng
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Balloon kyphoplasty and additional anterior odontoid screw fixation for treatment of unstable osteolytic lesions of the vertebral body C2: a case series.

Authors:  Anna Voelker; Nicolas H von der Hoeh; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.