Literature DB >> 22270580

Response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: assessment with diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 18FDG PET/CT.

Davide Ippolito1, Letizia Monguzzi, Luca Guerra, Elena Deponti, Gianstefano Gardani, Cristina Messa, Sandro Sironi.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the changes of SUV(max) and of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) before and after neoadjuvant therapy, to enable us predict the therapy response, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). A total of 30 patients with LARC who underwent CRT were recruited for our study. All the patients underwent a whole body 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan and a pelvic MR examination including DW imaging for staging (PET/CT1 and RM1), and after the chemoradiation therapy (PET/CT2, and RM2). Histopathologic analysis of rectal specimen, according to tumor regression grade (Mandard's criteria) was used as the standard reference. MR and PET-CT images were analyzed, and measurements of ADC values and SUV(max) were taken. Diagnostic performance for selection of complete responders (TRG1-2) and overall diagnostic accuracy for each item were calculated. After neoadjuvant therapy, all patients were submitted to surgery. According to Mandard's criteria, 21 tumors showed complete (TRG1) or subtotal regression (TRG2) and were classified as responders; nine tumors were classified as non responders (TRG3, 4, and 5). In all the patients, mean value of SUV(max) in PET/CT1 was higher than those in PET/CT2 (P < 0.001), whereas mean ADC value was lower in RM1 than RM2 (P < 0.001), with a significant percentage decrease of values after the treatment (P < 0.005).The best predictors cut-off values for TRG response were SUV(max) of 4.4 and ADC of 1.28 × 10(3) mm(2)/s with sensitivity, specificity accuracy, negative predictive value, and positive predictive values of 77.3%, 88.9%, 80.7%, 61.5%, and 94.4%, respectively. We conclude from the overall data of this study that the absolute values of SUV(max) and ADC of rectal lesion after CRT were the best parameters to define the response to treatment, by differentiating fibrosis from viable tumor tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270580     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-011-9839-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  20 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive radiation dose escalation in rectal adenocarcinoma: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan D Van Wickle; Eric S Paulson; Jerome C Landry; Beth A Erickson; William A Hall
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer: current applications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Niels W Schurink; Doenja M J Lambregts; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Fifteen different 18F-FDG PET/CT qualitative and quantitative parameters investigated as pathological response predictors of locally advanced rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Anna Margherita Maffione; Alice Ferretti; Gaia Grassetto; Elena Bellan; Carlo Capirci; Sotirios Chondrogiannis; Marcello Gava; Maria Cristina Marzola; Lucia Rampin; Claudia Bondesan; Patrick M Colletti; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Combined value of apparent diffusion coefficient-standardized uptake value max in evaluation of post-treated locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Davide Fior; Chiara Trattenero; Elena De Ponti; Silvia Drago; Luca Guerra; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-28

Review 5.  The use of PET/MRI for imaging rectal cancer.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Zahra Kassam; Andreas Loening; Michelle M McNamara; Raj Paspulati
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-11

6.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in locally advanced rectal cancer : pathological response prediction after neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  M Intven; O Reerink; M E P Philippens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  Diffusion MRI in early cancer therapeutic response assessment.

Authors:  C J Galbán; B A Hoff; T L Chenevert; B D Ross
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Correlation of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient with maximum standardized uptake on fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hale Çolakoğlu Er; Ayşe Erden; N Özlem Küçük; Ethem Geçim
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 9.  Effectiveness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting the response to chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haiting Xie; Tao Sun; Ming Chen; Hao Wang; Xin Zhou; Yunkai Zhang; Huanhong Zeng; Jilian Wang; Wei Fu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 10.  New Perspectives on Predictive Biomarkers of Tumor Response and Their Clinical Application in Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Nam Kyu Kim; Hyuk Hur
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.