Literature DB >> 22268210

Parotid gland tumors: preliminary data for the value of FDG PET/CT diagnostic parameters.

David Hadiprodjo1, Timothy Ryan, Minh-Tam Truong, Gustavo Mercier, Rathan M Subramaniam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to establish (18)F-FDG metabolic imaging parameters to differentiate benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with increased FDG uptake in the parotid gland were selected for the study group (29 men and 20 women; mean age, 63.14 ± 12.32 years). Another 49 patients without head and neck malignancies were selected as the control group (24 men and 25 women; mean age, 65.80 ± 11.51 years); they did not have a parotid lesion or increased FDG uptake in the parotid gland. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) was obtained for all patients. Metabolic tumor volume and total glycolytic activity were measured in patients with a discrete parotid lesion (n = 24). Nonparameteric Student t test (Mann-Whitney U test) was performed for between-group analysis.
RESULTS: The median SUV(max) of the increased diffuse uptake (2.55; interquartile range [IQR], 1.03-4.07) was significantly lower than the median SUV(max) of tumors (8.48; IQR, 1.46-15.5) (p < 0.01). The median SUV(max) of malignant tumors (11.8; IQR, 4.45-19.15) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of benign tumors (6.4; IQR, 3.4-9.0). There was significant difference (p = 0.003) in the median metabolic tumor volume for malignant tumors (8.9; IQR, 5.1-25.5) and benign tumors or lesions (1.4; IQR, 1.00-2.9). Similar results were found for total glycolytic activity for malignant tumors (67.9; IQR, 24.2-137.6) and benign tumors or lesions (8.4; IQR, 3.9-13.6) (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT SUV(max), metabolic tumor volume, and total glycolytic activity are imaging parameters to differentiate benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22268210     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

1.  Is There a Role for PET/CT Parameters to Characterize Benign, Malignant, and Metastatic Parotid Tumors?

Authors:  Ayse Tuba Karagulle Kendi; Kelly R Magliocca; Amanda Corey; James R Galt; Jeffrey Switchenko; J Trad Wadsworth; Mark W El-Deiry; David M Schuster; Nabil F Saba; Patricia A Hudgins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Prevalence and risk of malignancy of focal incidental uptake detected by fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the parotid gland: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giorgio Treglia; Francesco Bertagna; Ramin Sadeghi; Barbara Muoio; Luca Giovanella
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Utility of metabolic heterogeneity factor in differentiating malignant versus benign parotid uptake on 18F FDG PET-CT.

Authors:  Ramin Alipour; Steven Smith; Sandeep K Gupta
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-20

Review 4.  The role of PET/CT in the management of patients affected by head and neck tumors: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammaroto; Natale Quartuccio; Alessandro Sindoni; Francesca Di Mauro; Federico Caobelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Impacts of biological and procedural factors on semiquantification uptake value of liver in fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Mohd Hafizi Mahmud; Abdul Jalil Nordin; Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad; Ahmad Zaid Fattah Azman
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-10

6.  Coincidence of Malignant Melanoma and an Incidently Discovered Parotid Mass Presenting a Diagnostic Challenge.

Authors:  Handan Derebaşinlioğlu; Sarper Yilmaz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-08-07

7.  Predictors of pathologic outcome of focal FDG uptake in the parotid gland identified on whole-body FDG PET imaging.

Authors:  Marc C Mabray; Spencer C Behr; David M Naeger; Robert R Flavell; Christine M Glastonbury
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.605

8.  Head and neck PET/CT: therapy response interpretation criteria (Hopkins Criteria)-interreader reliability, accuracy, and survival outcomes.

Authors:  Charles Marcus; Anthony Ciarallo; Abdel K Tahari; Esther Mena; Wayne Koch; Richard L Wahl; Ana P Kiess; Hyunseok Kang; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  FDG-PET/CT pitfalls in oncological head and neck imaging.

Authors:  Bela S Purohit; Angeliki Ailianou; Nicolas Dulguerov; Christoph D Becker; Osman Ratib; Minerva Becker
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-08-26

Review 10.  Impacts of time interval on 18F-FDG uptake for PET/CT in normal organs: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rang Wang; Haotian Chen; Chengzhong Fan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.