P Howells1, R Eaton, A S Patel, P Taylor, B Modarai. 1. Vascular Unit, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, King's Health Partners, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Exposure to radiation doses above 2 Gray (Gy) can cause skin burns. There is also a lifetime cancer risk of ≈5.5% for every Sievert (Sv) of radiation. We assessed the radiation burden associated with endovascular treatment of the aorta. METHOD: Thoracic (TEVAR), Infra-renal (IEVAR) and branched/fenestrated (BEVAR/FEVAR) endovascular aortic repairs were studied. The prospectively recorded dosimetric parameters included: fluoroscopy time and dose area product (DAP). Exposure films, placed underneath 10 patients intra-operatively, recorded skin dose and were used to calculate skin (Gy) and tissue (Sv) doses. RESULTS: The TEVAR cohort (n = 232) were younger (p < 0.0001) than BEVAR/FEVAR (n = 53) and IEVAR (n = 630). The median DAP was higher (p = 0.004) in the BEVAR/FEVAR group compared with IEVAR and TEVAR: 32,060 cGy cm(2) (17,207-213,322) vs 17,300 cGy cm(2) (10,940-33,4340) vs 19,440 cGy cm2 (11,284-35,101), respectively. The equivalent skin doses were BEVAR/FEVAR: 1.3 Gy (0.71-8.75); IEVR: 0.71 Gy (0.44-13.7); TEVAR: 0.8 Gy (0.46-1.44). The whole body effective doses were BEVAR/FEVAR: 0.096 Sv (0.052-0.64); IEVR: 0.053 Sv (0.033-1.00); TEVAR: 0.058 Sv (0.034-0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The radiation exposure during endovascular aortic surgery is relatively low for the majority but some patients are exposed to very high doses. Efforts to minimise intra-operative exposure and graft surveillance methods that do not use radiation may reduce the cumulative lifetime malignancy risk. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: Exposure to radiation doses above 2 Gray (Gy) can cause skin burns. There is also a lifetime cancer risk of ≈5.5% for every Sievert (Sv) of radiation. We assessed the radiation burden associated with endovascular treatment of the aorta. METHOD: Thoracic (TEVAR), Infra-renal (IEVAR) and branched/fenestrated (BEVAR/FEVAR) endovascular aortic repairs were studied. The prospectively recorded dosimetric parameters included: fluoroscopy time and dose area product (DAP). Exposure films, placed underneath 10 patients intra-operatively, recorded skin dose and were used to calculate skin (Gy) and tissue (Sv) doses. RESULTS: The TEVAR cohort (n = 232) were younger (p < 0.0001) than BEVAR/FEVAR (n = 53) and IEVAR (n = 630). The median DAP was higher (p = 0.004) in the BEVAR/FEVAR group compared with IEVAR and TEVAR: 32,060 cGy cm(2) (17,207-213,322) vs 17,300 cGy cm(2) (10,940-33,4340) vs 19,440 cGy cm2 (11,284-35,101), respectively. The equivalent skin doses were BEVAR/FEVAR: 1.3 Gy (0.71-8.75); IEVR: 0.71 Gy (0.44-13.7); TEVAR: 0.8 Gy (0.46-1.44). The whole body effective doses were BEVAR/FEVAR: 0.096 Sv (0.052-0.64); IEVR: 0.053 Sv (0.033-1.00); TEVAR: 0.058 Sv (0.034-0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The radiation exposure during endovascular aortic surgery is relatively low for the majority but some patients are exposed to very high doses. Efforts to minimise intra-operative exposure and graft surveillance methods that do not use radiation may reduce the cumulative lifetime malignancy risk. Copyright Â
Authors: Monika Foerth; Michael C Seidenbusch; Mojtaba Sadeghi-Azandaryani; Ursula Lechel; Karla Maria Treitl; Marcus Treitl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: E Tuthill; L O'Hora; M O'Donohoe; S Panci; P Gilligan; D Campion; R Trenti; E Fox; D Catania; L Rainford Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael M McNally; Salvatore T Scali; Robert J Feezor; Daniel Neal; Thomas S Huber; Adam W Beck Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Tamer El-Sayed; Ashish S Patel; Jun S Cho; James A Kelly; Francesca E Ludwinski; Prakash Saha; Oliver T Lyons; Alberto Smith; Bijan Modarai Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 39.918