Literature DB >> 22262586

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Mini-Sentinel program: status and direction.

Richard Platt1, Ryan M Carnahan, Jeffrey S Brown, Elizabeth Chrischilles, Lesley H Curtis, Sean Hennessy, Jennifer C Nelson, Judith A Racoosin, Melissa Robb, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Sengwee Toh, Mark G Weiner.   

Abstract

The Mini-Sentinel is a pilot program that is developing methods, tools, resources, policies, and procedures to facilitate the use of routinely collected electronic healthcare data to perform active surveillance of the safety of marketed medical products, including drugs, biologics, and medical devices. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiated the program in 2009 as part of its Sentinel Initiative, in response to a Congressional mandate in the FDA Amendments Act of 2007. After two years, Mini-Sentinel includes 31 academic and private organizations. It has developed policies, procedures, and technical specifications for developing and operating a secure distributed data system comprised of separate data sets that conform to a common data model covering enrollment, demographics, encounters, diagnoses, procedures, and ambulatory dispensing of prescription drugs. The distributed data sets currently include administrative and claims data from 2000 to 2011 for over 300 million person-years, 2.4 billion encounters, 38 million inpatient hospitalizations, and 2.9 billion dispensings. Selected laboratory results and vital signs data recorded after 2005 are also available. There is an active data quality assessment and characterization program, and eligibility for medical care and pharmacy benefits is known. Systematic reviews of the literature have assessed the ability of administrative data to identify health outcomes of interest, and procedures have been developed and tested to obtain, abstract, and adjudicate full-text medical records to validate coded diagnoses. Mini-Sentinel has also created a taxonomy of study designs and analytical approaches for many commonly occurring situations, and it is developing new statistical and epidemiologic methods to address certain gaps in analytic capabilities. Assessments are performed by distributing computer programs that are executed locally by each data partner. The system is in active use by FDA, with the majority of assessments performed using customizable, reusable queries (programs). Prospective and retrospective assessments that use customized protocols are conducted as well. To date, several hundred unique programs have been distributed and executed. Current activities include active surveillance of several drugs and vaccines, expansion of the population, enhancement of the common data model to include additional types of data from electronic health records and registries, development of new methodologic capabilities, and assessment of methods to identify and validate additional health outcomes of interest.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22262586     DOI: 10.1002/pds.2343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  101 in total

1.  How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?

Authors:  Andre M Samuel; Vinay K Rathi; Jonathan N Grauer; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  From Big Data to Knowledge in the Social Sciences.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Richard P Moser; William T Riley
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 3.  Design and analysis of post-marketing research.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou; Wei Yang
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 1.978

4.  The landscape of comparative effectiveness research in rheumatology.

Authors:  Esi Morgan DeWitt; Hermine I Brunner
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  Ascertainment of acute liver injury in two European primary care databases.

Authors:  A Ruigómez; R Brauer; L A García Rodríguez; C Huerta; G Requena; M Gil; Francisco de Abajo; G Downey; A Bate; M Feudjo Tepie; M de Groot; R Schlienger; R Reynolds; O Klungel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Common Models, Different Approaches.

Authors:  Joshua J Gagne
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Product-Specific Regulatory Pathways to Approve Generic Drugs: The Need for Follow-up Studies to Ensure Safety and Effectiveness.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Joshua J Gagne
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Computable Phenotype Implementation for a National, Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial: Lessons Learned From ADAPTABLE.

Authors:  Faraz S Ahmad; Iben M Ricket; Bradley G Hammill; Lisa Eskenazi; Holly R Robertson; Lesley H Curtis; Cecilia D Dobi; Saket Girotra; Kevin Haynes; Jorge R Kizer; Sunil Kripalani; Mathew T Roe; Christianne L Roumie; Russ Waitman; W Schuyler Jones; Mark G Weiner
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-05-29

9.  Association of Risk for Venous Thromboembolism With Use of Low-Dose Extended- and Continuous-Cycle Combined Oral Contraceptives: A Safety Study Using the Sentinel Distributed Database.

Authors:  Jie Li; Genna Panucci; David Moeny; Wei Liu; Judith C Maro; Sengwee Toh; Ting-Ying Huang
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Academic centers play a vital role in the study of drug safety and effectiveness.

Authors:  Jingwen Tan; G Caleb Alexander; Jodi B Segal
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.393

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.