BACKGROUND: A fundamental obstacle to using retroviral-mediated gene transfer (GT) to treat human diseases is the relatively low transduction levels that have been achieved in clinically relevant human cells. We previously showed that performing GT in utero overcomes this obstacle and results in significant levels of transduction within multiple fetal organs, with different tissues exhibiting optimal transduction at different developmental stages. We undertook the present study aiming to elucidate the mechanism for this age-dependent transduction, testing the two factors that we hypothesized could be responsible: (i) the proliferative status of the tissue at the time of GT and (ii) the expression level of the amphotropic PiT-2 receptor. METHODS: Immunofluorescence was performed on tissues from sheep of varying developmental stages to assess the proliferative status of the predominant cells within each organ as a function of age. After developing an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a quantitative reverse transcription chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay, we then quantified PiT-2 expression at the protein and mRNA levels, respectively. RESULTS: The results obtained indicate that the proliferative status of organs at the time of fetal GT is not the major determinant governing transduction efficiency. By contrast, our ELISA and qRT-PCR analyses demonstrated that PiT-2 mRNA and protein levels vary with gestational age, correlating with the observed differences in transduction efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study explain the age-related differences that we previously observed in transduction efficiency after in utero GT. They also suggest it may be possible to achieve relatively selective GT to specific tissues by performing in utero GT when levels of PiT-2 are maximal in the desired target organ.
BACKGROUND: A fundamental obstacle to using retroviral-mediated gene transfer (GT) to treat human diseases is the relatively low transduction levels that have been achieved in clinically relevant human cells. We previously showed that performing GT in utero overcomes this obstacle and results in significant levels of transduction within multiple fetal organs, with different tissues exhibiting optimal transduction at different developmental stages. We undertook the present study aiming to elucidate the mechanism for this age-dependent transduction, testing the two factors that we hypothesized could be responsible: (i) the proliferative status of the tissue at the time of GT and (ii) the expression level of the amphotropicPiT-2 receptor. METHODS: Immunofluorescence was performed on tissues from sheep of varying developmental stages to assess the proliferative status of the predominant cells within each organ as a function of age. After developing an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a quantitative reverse transcription chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay, we then quantified PiT-2 expression at the protein and mRNA levels, respectively. RESULTS: The results obtained indicate that the proliferative status of organs at the time of fetal GT is not the major determinant governing transduction efficiency. By contrast, our ELISA and qRT-PCR analyses demonstrated that PiT-2 mRNA and protein levels vary with gestational age, correlating with the observed differences in transduction efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study explain the age-related differences that we previously observed in transduction efficiency after in utero GT. They also suggest it may be possible to achieve relatively selective GT to specific tissues by performing in utero GT when levels of PiT-2 are maximal in the desired target organ.
Authors: D M Bodine; T Moritz; R E Donahue; B D Luskey; S W Kessler; D I Martin; S H Orkin; A W Nienhuis; D A Williams Journal: Blood Date: 1993-10-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Akos Herzeg; Graça Almeida-Porada; R Alta Charo; Anna L David; Juan Gonzalez-Velez; Nalin Gupta; Larissa Lapteva; Billie Lianoglou; William Peranteau; Christopher Porada; Stephan J Sanders; Teresa N Sparks; David H Stitelman; Evi Struble; Charlotte J Sumner; Tippi C MacKenzie Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Ling Zhang; Steven A Feldman; Zhili Zheng; Nachimuthu Chinnasamy; Hui Xu; Azam V Nahvi; Mark E Dudley; Steven A Rosenberg; Richard A Morgan Journal: J Immunother Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: J Liao; Q Wei; J Fan; Y Zou; D Song; J Liu; F Liu; C Ma; X Hu; L Li; Y Yu; X Qu; L Chen; X Yu; Z Zhang; C Zhao; Z Zeng; R Zhang; S Yan; T Wu; X Wu; Y Shu; J Lei; Y Li; W Zhang; J Wang; R R Reid; M J Lee; W Huang; J M Wolf; T-C He; J Wang Journal: Gene Ther Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 5.250