PURPOSE: To determine the disease control rate and toxicity of treating patients with aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) with neoadjuvant gefitinib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A prospective phase II clinical trial evaluating neoadjuvant gefitinib given prior to standard treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy. Patients with stable disease after one cycle received escalated doses. Patients who responded were given gefitinib during radiation therapy, as well as maintenance therapy after definitive treatment. We analyzed the correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, mutation status, and gene copy number on available tissue samples and clinical response. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were accrued and 22 patients were evaluable for response prior to definitive local treatment; complete responses were attained by 18.2% of patients and partial responses by 27.3%. Grades 2 to 3 toxicities were observed in 59.1% of patients experiencing class-specific effects during induction therapy. After induction, 11.8% underwent surgery alone, 17.6% had definitive radiation, 11.8% were treated with radiation and concurrent gefitinib, and 47% had surgery with postoperative radiation and concurrent gefitinib. Median follow-up for the censored observations was 32 months. Two-year overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival rates were 72.1%, 72.1%, and 63.6%, respectively. No EGFR-activating mutations were identified in tumor samples available from 10 patients. No associations between EGFR correlative studies and patient outcomes were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib, in the neoadjuvant setting, was active and well tolerated in patients with aggressive CSCC and did not interfere with definitive treatment. In view of the 18% complete response rate we observed, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be further explored in the treatment of aggressive CSCC.
PURPOSE: To determine the disease control rate and toxicity of treating patients with aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) with neoadjuvant gefitinib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A prospective phase II clinical trial evaluating neoadjuvant gefitinib given prior to standard treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy. Patients with stable disease after one cycle received escalated doses. Patients who responded were given gefitinib during radiation therapy, as well as maintenance therapy after definitive treatment. We analyzed the correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, mutation status, and gene copy number on available tissue samples and clinical response. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were accrued and 22 patients were evaluable for response prior to definitive local treatment; complete responses were attained by 18.2% of patients and partial responses by 27.3%. Grades 2 to 3 toxicities were observed in 59.1% of patients experiencing class-specific effects during induction therapy. After induction, 11.8% underwent surgery alone, 17.6% had definitive radiation, 11.8% were treated with radiation and concurrent gefitinib, and 47% had surgery with postoperative radiation and concurrent gefitinib. Median follow-up for the censored observations was 32 months. Two-year overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival rates were 72.1%, 72.1%, and 63.6%, respectively. No EGFR-activating mutations were identified in tumor samples available from 10 patients. No associations between EGFR correlative studies and patient outcomes were identified. CONCLUSIONS:Gefitinib, in the neoadjuvant setting, was active and well tolerated in patients with aggressive CSCC and did not interfere with definitive treatment. In view of the 18% complete response rate we observed, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be further explored in the treatment of aggressive CSCC.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kauko Saarilahti; Petri Bono; Mikael Kajanti; Leif Bäck; Ilmo Leivo; Timo Joensuu; Jorma Isola; Antti A Mäkitie Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-06
Authors: S Ikegawa; T Saida; H Obayashi; A Sasaki; H Esumi; S Ikeda; Y Kiyohara; K Hayasaka; K Ishihara Journal: J Dermatol Date: 1989-06 Impact factor: 4.005
Authors: J Simon W Stewart; Ezra E W Cohen; Lisa Licitra; Carla M L Van Herpen; Chonlakiet Khorprasert; Denis Soulieres; Pavel Vodvarka; Danny Rischin; Avgust M Garin; Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Serban Ghiorghiu; Laura Hargreaves; Alison Armour; Georgina Speake; Alan Swaisland; Everett E Vokes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ahmad Jalili; Alice Pinc; Friederike Pieczkowski; Franz M Karlhofer; Georg Stingl; Stephan N Wagner Journal: J Dtsch Dermatol Ges Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.584
Authors: Alessandro Borghi; Sergio Gianesini; Massimo Pedriali; Antonio Stefanelli; Giovanni Mangiola; Patrizia Dalla Caneva; Giovanni Lanza; Annarosa Virgili; Paolo Zamboni Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2016-01-10 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Justin Wray; Christopher G Morris; Jessica M Kirwan; Robert J Amdur; John W Werning; Peter T Dziegielewski; William M Mendenhall Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Yvonne Y Li; Glenn J Hanna; Alvaro C Laga; Robert I Haddad; Jochen H Lorch; Peter S Hammerman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kathryn A Gold; Merrill S Kies; William N William; Faye M Johnson; J Jack Lee; Bonnie S Glisson Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Min Joung Lee; Namju Kim; Ho-Kyung Choung; Ji-Young Choe; Sang In Khwarg; Ji Eun Kim Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2015-07-04 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Samantha Tam; Christopher M K L Yao; Moran Amit; Mona Gajera; Xiaoning Luo; Rachel Treistman; Anshu Khanna; Mohamed Aashiq; Priyadharsini Nagarajan; Diana Bell; Adel El-Naggar; Michael Migden; Michael Wong; Bonnie Glisson; Renata Ferrarotto; Bita Esmaeli; David Rosenthal; Guojun Li; Randal S Weber; Jeffrey N Myers; Neil D Gross Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: U Hillen; M Ulrich; M Alter; J C Becker; R Gutzmer; U Leiter; A Lonsdorf; A Messerschmidt; C Ulrich Journal: Hautarzt Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 0.751