Literature DB >> 22261742

Factors and outcomes associated with recanalization timing after thrombolysis.

Kyung-Hee Cho1, Deok Hee Lee, Sun U Kwon, Choong Gon Choi, Sang Joon Kim, Dae-Chul Suh, Jong S Kim, Dong-Wha Kang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A substantial number of acute stroke patients do not respond immediately to aggressive intra-arterial (IA) recanalization therapy. The factors and outcomes associated with timing of recanalization after IA thrombolysis, however, have not yet been determined.
METHODS: Factors and outcomes in 75 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with IA urokinase (± intravenous tissue plasminogen activator) within 6 h of onset were retrospectively assessed. Immediate recanalization (IR) was assessed by the angiogram at the end of the IA procedure, and delayed (DR) and no (NR) recanalization were assessed by 5-day MR angiography. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were determined at 7 days and 3 months.
RESULTS: Of the 75 patients, 32 (42.7%) achieved IR, 21 (28%) achieved DR, and 22 (29.3%) showed NR. Good functional outcomes (mRS score ≤2) at 7 days and 3 months were observed in 59.4 and 62.5%, respectively, of the IR group, 14.3 and 38.1% of the DR group, and 22.7 and 27.3% of the NR group (p = 0.001 for 7 days, p = 0.028 for 3 months). Multivariate analysis showed that cardioembolism [odds ratio (OR), 3.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-12.19] and middle cerebral artery occlusion (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.04-10.04) were independent predictors of IR or DR compared with NR. Age (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.95) and initial NIHSS score (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37) were independent predictors of DR compared with IR.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving IA thrombolysis show different clinical and radiological characteristics according to the timing of recanalization. Earlier identification of DR patients and their more efficient recanalization may improve overall clinical outcomes after IA thrombolysis.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22261742     DOI: 10.1159/000334666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  5 in total

1.  Relationship between thrombus attenuation and different stroke subtypes.

Authors:  J M Niesten; I C van der Schaaf; G J Biessels; A E van Otterloo; T van Seeters; A D Horsch; M J A Luitse; Y van der Graaf; L J Kappelle; W P T M Mali; B K Velthuis
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Aortic arch calcification, procedural times, and outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Haseeb A Rahman; Malik M Adil; Ameer E Hassan; Jefferson T Miley
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-06

3.  The outcome and efficacy of recanalization in patients with acute internal carotid artery occlusion.

Authors:  J H Kwak; L Zhao; J K Kim; S Park; D-G Lee; J H Shim; D H Lee; J S Kim; D C Suh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Evolution of the stroke paradigm: A review of delayed recanalization.

Authors:  Richard Camara; Nathanael Matei; John H Zhang
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging in acute ischemic stroke treatment.

Authors:  Bum Joon Kim; Hyun Goo Kang; Hye-Jin Kim; Sung-Ho Ahn; Na Young Kim; Steven Warach; Dong-Wha Kang
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 6.967

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.