Literature DB >> 22261362

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus acceleration of radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (GORTEC 99-02): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial.

Jean Bourhis1, Christian Sire, Pierre Graff, Vincent Grégoire, Philippe Maingon, Gilles Calais, Bernard Gery, Laurent Martin, Marc Alfonsi, Patrick Desprez, Thierry Pignon, Etienne Bardet, Michel Rives, Lionel Geoffrois, Nicolas Daly-Schveitzer, Sok Sen, Claude Tuchais, Olivier Dupuis, Stéphane Guerif, Michel Lapeyre, Véronique Favrel, Marc Hamoir, Antoine Lusinchi, Stéphane Temam, Antonella Pinna, Yun Gan Tao, Pierre Blanchard, Anne Aupérin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy and accelerated radiotherapy independently improve outcomes for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a combination of these approaches.
METHODS: In our open-label phase 3 randomised trial, we enrolled patients with locally advanced, stage III and IV (non-metastatic) HNSCC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. We randomly allocated patients centrally with a computer program (with centre, T stage, N stage, and localisation as minimisation factors) in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive conventional chemoradiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks plus three cycles of 4 days' concomitant carboplatin-fluorouracil), accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy (70 Gy in 6 weeks plus two cycles of 5 days' concomitant carboplatin-fluorouracil), or very accelerated radiotherapy alone (64·8 Gy [1·8 Gy twice daily] in 3·5 weeks). The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was assessed in all enrolled patients. This trial is completed. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00828386.
FINDINGS: Between Feb 29, 2000, and May 9, 2007, we randomly allocated 279 patients to receive conventional chemoradiotherapy, 280 to accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy, and 281 to very accelerated radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 5·2 years (IQR 4·9-6·2); rates of chemotherapy and radiotherapy compliance were good in all groups. Accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy offered no PFS benefit compared with conventional chemoradiotherapy (HR 1·02, 95% CI 0·84-1·23; p=0·88) or very accelerated radiotherapy (0·83, 0·69-1·01; p=0·060); conventional chemoradiotherapy improved PFS compared with very accelerated radiotherapy (0·82, 0·67-0·99; p=0·041). 3-year PFS was 37·6% (95% CI 32·1-43·4) after conventional chemoradiotherapy, 34·1% (28·7-39·8) after accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy, and 32·2% (27·0-37·9) after very accelerated radiotherapy. More patients in the very accelerated radiotherapy group had RTOG grade 3-4 acute mucosal toxicity (226 [84%] of 268 patients) compared with accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy (205 [76%] of 271 patients) or conventional chemoradiotherapy (180 [69%] of 262; p=0·0001). 158 (60%) of 265 patients in the conventional chemoradiotherapy group, 176 (64%) of 276 patients in the accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy group, and 190 (70%) of 272 patients in the very accelerated radiotherapy group were intubated with feeding tubes during treatment (p=0·045).
INTERPRETATION: Chemotherapy has a substantial treatment effect given concomitantly with radiotherapy and acceleration of radiotherapy cannot compensate for the absence of chemotherapy. We noted the most favourable outcomes for conventional chemoradiotherapy, suggesting that acceleration of radiotherapy is probably not beneficial in concomitant chemoradiotherapy schedules. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22261362     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70346-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  86 in total

1.  Randomized phase III trial to test accelerated versus standard fractionation in combination with concurrent cisplatin for head and neck carcinomas in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0129 trial: long-term report of efficacy and toxicity.

Authors:  Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan; Qiang Zhang; K Kian Ang; Randal S Weber; David I Rosenthal; Denis Soulieres; Harold Kim; Craig Silverman; Adam Raben; Thomas J Galloway; André Fortin; Elizabeth Gore; William H Westra; Christine H Chung; Richard C Jordan; Maura L Gillison; Marcie List; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Increased sensitivity of HPV-positive head and neck cancer cell lines to x-irradiation ± Cisplatin due to decreased expression of E6 and E7 oncoproteins and enhanced apoptosis.

Authors:  Frank Ziemann; Andrea Arenz; Stefanie Preising; Claus Wittekindt; Jens P Klussmann; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Andrea Wittig
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 3.  Chemotherapy advances in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Peter Georges; Kumar Rajagopalan; Chady Leon; Priya Singh; Nadir Ahmad; Kamyar Nader; Gregory J Kubicek
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

4.  [Accelerated versus conventional fractionation in combined chemoradiotherapy of head and neck tumors].

Authors:  Martina Becker-Schiebe; Hans Christiansen
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Hartmut T Klages
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Therapeutic Intensification and Induction Chemotherapy for High-Risk Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Ghi; Adriano Paccagnella
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-01-11

Review 7.  Gastrointestinal Toxicities With Combined Antiangiogenic and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Erqi L Pollom; Lei Deng; Reetesh K Pai; J Martin Brown; Amato Giaccia; Billy W Loo; David B Shultz; Quynh Thu Le; Albert C Koong; Daniel T Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy vs. cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy for p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer: an updated meta-analysis including trials RTOG 1016 and De-ESCALaTE.

Authors:  Petar Suton; Marko Skelin; Zoran Rakusic; Stjepan Dokuzovic; Ivica Luksic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Concurrent hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with 5-FU and once weekly cisplatin in locally advanced head and neck cancer. The 10-year results of a prospective phase II trial.

Authors:  V Budach; E-T Becker; D Boehmer; H Badakhshi; U Jahn; K-D Wernecke; C Stromberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 10.  Recent Landmark Studies on Head and Neck Cancers: Evidence-Based Fundamentals of Modern Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Utku Aydil
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.