OBJECTIVE: Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) is required for the repair of platinum-induced DNA damage. This study sought to assess the prognostic value of ERCC1 expression, measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a highly specific antibody, in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors were collected from two GOG phase III trials (GOG-172 and GOG-182) of patients with stage III/IV EOC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. ERCC1 was detected by (IHC) using FL297 polyclonal antibody and tumors were categorized as negative or positive, based on nuclear staining of tumor cells. ERCC1 genotyping was performed as previously reported. Associations between ERCC1 expression and clinical characteristics, platinum responsiveness, progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 408 eligible patients, 27% had tumors that were ERCC1 positive. ERCC1 expression was not associated with clinical characteristics or platinum-responsiveness. Women with ERCC1-positive versus -negative tumors had similar median PFS (17.9 months versus 17.5 months, respectively, p=0.59), median OS (52.0 months versus 47.0 months, respectively, p=0.30), risk of disease progression (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-1.15, p=0.41), and risk of death (adjusted HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.61-1.07, p=0.14). ERCC1 expression, as measured by IHC, was not associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), in codon 118 and C8092A, of the ERCC1 gene. CONCLUSIONS: ERCC1 expression, measured by IHC in pre-treatment tumor specimens, using a highly specific antibody, has limited clinical value in patients with advanced EOC treated with platinum and taxane based chemotherapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE:Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) is required for the repair of platinum-induced DNA damage. This study sought to assess the prognostic value of ERCC1 expression, measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a highly specific antibody, in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS:Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors were collected from two GOG phase III trials (GOG-172 and GOG-182) of patients with stage III/IV EOC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. ERCC1 was detected by (IHC) using FL297 polyclonal antibody and tumors were categorized as negative or positive, based on nuclear staining of tumor cells. ERCC1 genotyping was performed as previously reported. Associations between ERCC1 expression and clinical characteristics, platinum responsiveness, progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 408 eligible patients, 27% had tumors that were ERCC1 positive. ERCC1 expression was not associated with clinical characteristics or platinum-responsiveness. Women with ERCC1-positive versus -negative tumors had similar median PFS (17.9 months versus 17.5 months, respectively, p=0.59), median OS (52.0 months versus 47.0 months, respectively, p=0.30), risk of disease progression (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-1.15, p=0.41), and risk of death (adjusted HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.61-1.07, p=0.14). ERCC1 expression, as measured by IHC, was not associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), in codon 118 and C8092A, of the ERCC1 gene. CONCLUSIONS:ERCC1 expression, measured by IHC in pre-treatment tumor specimens, using a highly specific antibody, has limited clinical value in patients with advanced EOC treated with platinum and taxane based chemotherapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: M Volker; M J Moné; P Karmakar; A van Hoffen; W Schul; W Vermeulen; J H Hoeijmakers; R van Driel; A A van Zeeland; L H Mullenders Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Deborah K Armstrong; Brian Bundy; Lari Wenzel; Helen Q Huang; Rebecca Baergen; Shashikant Lele; Larry J Copeland; Joan L Walker; Robert A Burger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-01-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ken A Olaussen; Ariane Dunant; Pierre Fouret; Elisabeth Brambilla; Fabrice André; Vincent Haddad; Estelle Taranchon; Martin Filipits; Robert Pirker; Helmut H Popper; Rolf Stahel; Laure Sabatier; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Thomas Tursz; Thierry Le Chevalier; Jean-Charles Soria Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Q Li; J J Yu; C Mu; M K Yunmbam; D Slavsky; C L Cross; F Bostick-Bruton; E Reed Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2000 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: W P McGuire; W J Hoskins; M F Brady; P R Kucera; E E Partridge; K Y Look; D L Clarke-Pearson; M Davidson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-01-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joshua R Heyza; Wen Lei; Donovan Watza; Hao Zhang; Wei Chen; Jessica B Back; Ann G Schwartz; Gerold Bepler; Steve M Patrick Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Shruti Rao; Robert A Beckman; Shahla Riazi; Cinthya S Yabar; Simina M Boca; John L Marshall; Michael J Pishvaian; Jonathan R Brody; Subha Madhavan Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-06-06