Literature DB >> 22260652

The cost-effectiveness of celecoxib vs diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis in the UK; an update to the NICE model using data from the CONDOR trial.

N Brereton1, B Winn, R Akehurst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) health economic model for assessing the cost-effectiveness of celecoxib plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) compared to diclofenac plus PPI in the treatment of osteoarthritis has been updated using new adverse event (AE) risks from the CONDOR trial. In light of this new information, this study aimed to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of celecoxib plus PPI compared to diclofenac plus PPI.
METHODS: NICE developed a health economic model as part of their 2008 multiple technology assessment of treatments for osteoarthritis. The model was adapted for this study to update the relative risks of adverse events, using data from the CONDOR trial.
RESULTS: Using the AE data from the CLASS trial alone, celecoxib plus PPI has an ICER of £9538 per QALY when compared to diclofenac plus PPI. When the AE data from CONDOR alone is used, this ICER decreases to £4773 per QALY. Using the pooled data from both trials, celecoxib plus PPI has an ICER of £9377 per QALY compared to diclofenac plus PPI. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that when new AE risks are used, celecoxib plus PPI remains a cost-effective treatment for OA when compared to diclofenac plus PPI. However, this analysis is limited by the short time horizon, and additional AEs that have not been considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22260652     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2012.659778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical management for osteoarthritis pain: a systematic review of the literature and recommendations for future economic evaluation.

Authors:  Feng Xie; Pimwara Tanvejsilp; Kaitryn Campbell; Kathryn Gaebel
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Cost-utility analysis of imrecoxib compared with celecoxib for patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Xueshan Sun; Xuemei Zhen; Xiaoqian Hu; Yuanyuan Li; Shuyan Gu; Yuxuan Gu; Zixuan Zhao; Wei Yang; Hengjin Dong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

3.  The cost-effectiveness of celecoxib versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus proton-pump inhibitors in the treatment of osteoarthritis in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Sherif A Nasef; A Aziz Shaaban; Joaquin Mould-Quevedo; Tarek A Ismail
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-06-11

4.  Safe prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with osteoarthritis--an expert consensus addressing benefits as well as gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks.

Authors:  Carmelo Scarpignato; Angel Lanas; Corrado Blandizzi; Willem F Lems; Matthias Hermann; Richard H Hunt
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacological Management for Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jiayu Shi; Kenan Fan; Lei Yan; Zijuan Fan; Fei Li; Guishan Wang; Haifeng Liu; Peidong Liu; Hongmei Yu; Jiao Jiao Li; Bin Wang
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  An economic evaluation of knee osteoarthritis treatments in Thailand.

Authors:  Parnnaphat Luksameesate; Aree Tanavalee; Suthira Taychakhoonavudh
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.988

7.  Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Celecoxib versus Ibuprofen and Naproxen in Patients with Osteoarthritis in United Arab Emirates Based on the PRECISION Trial.

Authors:  Viktor V Chirikov; Chris Walker; Jennifer M Stephens; Patricia Schepman; Richard Chambers; Mahmoud Bakir; Gregory W Poorman; Seema Haider; Mohammed Farghaly
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-05-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.