BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent and chronic condition characterized by pain and physical disability. Currently, many treatments are available, and they primarily target pain relief. The objectives of this study were to systematically review economic evaluations for pharmaceutical management of OA pain and to provide methodological recommendations for future economic evaluation. METHODS: Published literature was identified by searching the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (1948-16 November 2011) with In-Process records and EMBASE (1980-2011 Week 47) via Ovid; The Cochrane Library (Issue 4 of 4, 2011) and the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED) via Wiley; and PubMed (for non-MEDLINE records). The main search terms were OA and economic evaluations. Two reviewers independently screened all identified articles and extracted the data from those included in the final review. RESULTS: Twelve articles reporting the cost-effectiveness of various pharmaceuticals were included, with five being trial-based and seven being model-based economic evaluations. The mean health economics quality score of the included articles was 84 (minimum-maximum: 63-99). These evaluations varied in study design, treatments compared, and outcomes measured. CONCLUSION: The existing economic evaluations on pharmaceutical management of OA pain were of acceptable quality. Comparability of economic evaluations could be improved by selecting standard comparators, adopting a longer time horizon, and directly measuring health utilities.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent and chronic condition characterized by pain and physical disability. Currently, many treatments are available, and they primarily target pain relief. The objectives of this study were to systematically review economic evaluations for pharmaceutical management of OA pain and to provide methodological recommendations for future economic evaluation. METHODS: Published literature was identified by searching the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (1948-16 November 2011) with In-Process records and EMBASE (1980-2011 Week 47) via Ovid; The Cochrane Library (Issue 4 of 4, 2011) and the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED) via Wiley; and PubMed (for non-MEDLINE records). The main search terms were OA and economic evaluations. Two reviewers independently screened all identified articles and extracted the data from those included in the final review. RESULTS: Twelve articles reporting the cost-effectiveness of various pharmaceuticals were included, with five being trial-based and seven being model-based economic evaluations. The mean health economics quality score of the included articles was 84 (minimum-maximum: 63-99). These evaluations varied in study design, treatments compared, and outcomes measured. CONCLUSION: The existing economic evaluations on pharmaceutical management of OA pain were of acceptable quality. Comparability of economic evaluations could be improved by selecting standard comparators, adopting a longer time horizon, and directly measuring health utilities.
Authors: K M Jordan; N K Arden; M Doherty; B Bannwarth; J W J Bijlsma; P Dieppe; K Gunther; H Hauselmann; G Herrero-Beaumont; P Kaklamanis; S Lohmander; B Leeb; M Lequesne; B Mazieres; E Martin-Mola; K Pavelka; A Pendleton; L Punzi; U Serni; B Swoboda; G Verbruggen; I Zimmerman-Gorska; M Dougados Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont; José Andrés Román Ivorra; María Del Carmen Trabado; Francisco Javier Blanco; Pere Benito; Emilio Martín-Mola; Javier Paulino; José Luis Marenco; Armando Porto; Armando Laffon; Domingos Araújo; Manuel Figueroa; Jaime Branco Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2007-02
Authors: S Scholtissen; O Bruyère; A Neuprez; J L Severens; G Herrero-Beaumont; L Rovati; M Hiligsmann; J Y Reginster Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Deborah A Marshall; Marcie E Strauss; Dan Pericak; Melanie Buitendyk; Christine Codding; George W Torrance Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: C Black; C Clar; R Henderson; C MacEachern; P McNamee; Z Quayyum; P Royle; S Thomas Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: W Zhang; R W Moskowitz; G Nuki; S Abramson; R D Altman; N Arden; S Bierma-Zeinstra; K D Brandt; P Croft; M Doherty; M Dougados; M Hochberg; D J Hunter; K Kwoh; L S Lohmander; P Tugwell Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Anonnya R Chowdhury; Petra L Graham; Deborah Schofield; Michelle Cunich; Michael Nicholas Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 3.442