Literature DB >> 22259691

Minimally invasive multi-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneously inserted spinal fixation system : technical tips, surgical outcomes.

Hyeun Sung Kim1, Keun Ho Park, Chag Il Ju, Seok Won Kim, Seung Myung Lee, Ho Shin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There are technical limitations of multi-level posterior pedicle screw fixation performed by the percutaneous technique. The purpose of this study was to describe the surgical technique and outcome of minimally invasive multi-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and to determine its efficacy.
METHODS: Forty-two patients who underwent mini-open PLIF using the percutaneous screw fixation system were studied. The mean age of the patients was 59.1 (range, 23 to 78 years). Two levels were involved in 32 cases and three levels in 10 cases. The clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). Achievement of radiological fusion, intra-operative blood loss, the midline surgical scar and procedure related complications were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 25.3 months. The mean LBOS prior to surgery was 34.5, which was improved to 49.1 at the final follow up. The mean pain score (VAS) prior to surgery was 7.5 and it was decreased to 2.9 at the last follow up. The mean estimated blood loss was 238 mL (140-350) for the two level procedures and 387 mL (278-458) for three levels. The midline surgical scar was 6.27 cm for two levels and 8.25 cm for three level procedures. Complications included two cases of asymptomatic medial penetration of the pedicle border. However, there were no signs of neurological deterioration or fusion failure.
CONCLUSION: Multi-level, minimally invasive PLIF can be performed effectively using the percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation system. It can be an alternative to the traditional open procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; Percutaneous; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Year:  2011        PMID: 22259691      PMCID: PMC3259464          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2011.50.5.441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  13 in total

1.  Posterior percutaneous spine instrumentation.

Authors:  G L Lowery; S S Kulkarni
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-art technical advances. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.

Authors:  Praveen V Mummaneni; Regis W Haid; Gerald E Rodts
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-07

3.  Advantages of the paraspinal muscle splitting approach in comparison with conventional midline approach for s1 pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Masato Ota; Masashi Neo; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Minimally invasive posterior fixation.

Authors:  Michael Y Wang; D Greg Anderson; Kornelis A Poelstra; Steven C Ludwig
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis.

Authors:  Y Kawaguchi; H Matsui; H Tsuji
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The human lumbar dorsal rami.

Authors:  N Bogduk; A S Wilson; W Tynan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Current treatment strategies for the painful lumbar motion segment: posterolateral fusion versus interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jeremy C Wang; Praveen V Mummaneni; Regis W Haid
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Fusion criteria for posterior lumbar interbody fusion with intervertebral cages : the significance of traction spur.

Authors:  Kyung Hoon Kim; Jeong Yoon Park; Dong Kyu Chin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-10-31

9.  Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron; Gowriharan Thaiyananthan; Kunwar Khalsa; Theodore B Goldstein
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-10

10.  The failed posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  F T Wetzel; H LaRocca
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using an unilateral cage: a prospective study of clinical outcome and stability.

Authors:  Seok Ki Lee; Seok Won Kim; Chang Il Ju; Sung Myung Lee; Myung Hoon Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2014-06-30

2.  Mini-open PLIF for Moderate to High Grade Spondylolisthesis: Technique to Achieve Spontaneous Reduction.

Authors:  Se Ho Jeong; Hyeun Sung Kim; Seok Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2015-12-31

3.  Comparative analysis of adjacent levels of degeneration and clinical outcomes between conventional pedicle screws and percutaneous pedicle screws in treatment of degenerative disease at l3-5; a preliminary report.

Authors:  Tae Kyoo Lim; Sang Gu Lee; Chan Woo Park; Woo Kyung Kim; Seong Son; Keun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-06-30

4.  An Outcome Measure of Functionality and Pain in Patients with Low Back Disorder: A Validation Study of the Iranian version of Low Back Outcome Score.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Shazadi; Hamid Khayat Kashany; Hassan Reza Mohammadi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16

5.  Minimally invasive spine surgery: evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes and their correlation with the return to work.

Authors:  Anibal Correia Silva; Tabata Alcantara
Journal:  Rev Bras Med Trab       Date:  2020-12-11

6.  PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION: RESULTS OVER 47 MONTHS OF FOLLOW-UP.

Authors:  Anibal Correia Silva; Tabata DE Alcantara; Monica Paschoal Nogueira
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 0.513

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.