Literature DB >> 22259542

5,6-Dimethyl-1,2,4-triazin-3-amine.

Man-Hua Wu, Qi-Ming Qiu, Sen Gao, Qiong-Hua Jin, Cun-Lin Zhang.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C(5)H(8)N(4), adjacent mol-ecules are connected through N-H⋯N n class="Chemical">hydrogen bonds, resulting in a zigzag chain along [100]. The amino groups and heterocyclic N atoms are involved in further N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds, forming R(2) (2)(8) motifs.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22259542      PMCID: PMC3254400          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811051920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological and medical applications of triazine, see: Anderson et al.(2003 ▶); Gavai et al. (2009 ▶); Hunt et al. (2004 ▶). For the structures of complexes containing n class="Chemical">triazine, see: Drew et al. (2001 ▶); Li et al. (2009 ▶); Machura et al. (2008 ▶). For the structures of complexes containing the title compound, see: Jiang et al. (2011 ▶); Self et al. (1991 ▶); Wu et al. (2011 ▶). For the structures of compounds containing (8)-type hydrogen bonds, see: Etter (1990 ▶); Glidewell et al. (2003 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C5H8N4 M = 124.14 Orthorhombic, a = 7.4877 (8) Å b = 6.7530 (7) Å c = 12.6615 (13) Å V = 640.22 (12) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.50 × 0.39 × 0.38 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.960, T max = 0.969 2997 measured reflections 614 independent reflections 421 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.034

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.048 wR(F 2) = 0.157 S = 1.11 614 reflections 58 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811051920/rn2097sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811051920/rn2097Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811051920/rn2097Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C5H8N4Dx = 1.278 Mg m3
Mr = 124.14Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, PnmaCell parameters from 1029 reflections
a = 7.4877 (8) Åθ = 2.7–28.0°
b = 6.7530 (7) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 12.6615 (13) ÅT = 293 K
V = 640.22 (12) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 40.50 × 0.39 × 0.38 mm
F(000) = 264
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer614 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube421 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.034
phi and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)h = −7→8
Tmin = 0.960, Tmax = 0.969k = −8→7
2997 measured reflectionsl = −14→15
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.157H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0627P)2 + 0.3625P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
614 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
58 parametersΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
N11.0561 (4)0.25000.5062 (2)0.0514 (9)
N21.0506 (4)0.25000.6123 (2)0.0499 (8)
N30.7314 (4)0.25000.60746 (19)0.0466 (8)
N40.8858 (4)0.25000.7657 (2)0.0609 (10)
H4A0.98380.25000.80110.073*
H4B0.78500.25000.79820.073*
C10.8903 (4)0.25000.6589 (2)0.0447 (9)
C20.7407 (5)0.25000.5030 (2)0.0469 (9)
C30.9072 (5)0.25000.4511 (2)0.0477 (9)
C40.5682 (5)0.25000.4422 (3)0.0678 (12)
H4C0.57200.35120.38900.102*0.50
H4D0.47080.27550.48960.102*0.50
H4E0.55160.12330.40930.102*0.50
C50.9233 (5)0.25000.3332 (2)0.0624 (11)
H5A0.85060.14610.30440.094*0.50
H5B1.04560.22860.31370.094*0.50
H5C0.88390.37530.30600.094*0.50
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0485 (19)0.063 (2)0.0425 (16)0.0000.0087 (13)0.000
N20.0412 (17)0.069 (2)0.0395 (16)0.0000.0016 (12)0.000
N30.0431 (16)0.062 (2)0.0346 (15)0.000−0.0012 (11)0.000
N40.0382 (16)0.105 (3)0.0391 (16)0.000−0.0064 (12)0.000
C10.0417 (19)0.057 (2)0.0350 (17)0.000−0.0008 (13)0.000
C20.054 (2)0.050 (2)0.0374 (19)0.000−0.0014 (14)0.000
C30.055 (2)0.049 (2)0.0397 (19)0.0000.0031 (16)0.000
C40.060 (2)0.097 (3)0.047 (2)0.000−0.0118 (17)0.000
C50.075 (3)0.074 (3)0.0376 (19)0.0000.0075 (18)0.000
N1—C31.315 (4)C2—C41.503 (5)
N1—N21.344 (4)C3—C51.498 (4)
N2—C11.338 (4)C4—H4C0.9600
N3—C21.325 (4)C4—H4D0.9600
N3—C11.356 (4)C4—H4E0.9600
N4—C11.353 (4)C5—H5A0.9600
N4—H4A0.8600C5—H5B0.9600
N4—H4B0.8600C5—H5C0.9600
C2—C31.409 (5)
C3—N1—N2120.2 (3)C2—C3—C5122.4 (3)
C1—N2—N1117.9 (3)C2—C4—H4C109.5
C2—N3—C1115.7 (3)C2—C4—H4D109.5
C1—N4—H4A120.0H4C—C4—H4D109.5
C1—N4—H4B120.0C2—C4—H4E109.5
H4A—N4—H4B120.0H4C—C4—H4E109.5
N2—C1—N4117.6 (3)H4D—C4—H4E109.5
N2—C1—N3125.2 (3)C3—C5—H5A109.5
N4—C1—N3117.3 (3)C3—C5—H5B109.5
N3—C2—C3120.8 (3)H5A—C5—H5B109.5
N3—C2—C4117.7 (3)C3—C5—H5C109.5
C3—C2—C4121.5 (3)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
N1—C3—C2120.2 (3)H5B—C5—H5C109.5
N1—C3—C5117.4 (3)
C3—N1—N2—C10.0N2—N1—C3—C20.0
N1—N2—C1—N4180.0N2—N1—C3—C5180.0
N1—N2—C1—N30.000 (1)N3—C2—C3—N10.0
C2—N3—C1—N20.000 (1)C4—C2—C3—N1180.0
C2—N3—C1—N4180.0N3—C2—C3—C5180.0
C1—N3—C2—C30.0C4—C2—C3—C50.0
C1—N3—C2—C4180.0
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N4—H4A···N3i0.862.193.045 (4)179.
N4—H4B···N2ii0.862.092.947 (4)176.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N4—H4A⋯N3i0.862.193.045 (4)179
N4—H4B⋯N2ii0.862.092.947 (4)176

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Discovery of the pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazine nucleus as a new kinase inhibitor template.

Authors:  John T Hunt; Toomas Mitt; Robert Borzilleri; Johnni Gullo-Brown; Joseph Fargnoli; Brian Fink; Wen-Ching Han; Steven Mortillo; Gregory Vite; Barri Wautlet; Tai Wong; Chiang Yu; Xiaoping Zheng; Rajeev Bhide
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Discovery and preclinical evaluation of [4-[[1-(3-fluorophenyl)methyl]-1H-indazol-5-ylamino]-5-methylpyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-6-yl]carbamic acid, (3S)-3-morpholinylmethyl ester (BMS-599626), a selective and orally efficacious inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor 1 and 2 kinases.

Authors:  Ashvinikumar V Gavai; Brian E Fink; David J Fairfax; Gregory S Martin; Lana M Rossiter; Christian L Holst; Soong-Hoon Kim; Kenneth J Leavitt; Harold Mastalerz; Wen-Ching Han; Derek Norris; Bindu Goyal; Shankar Swaminathan; Bharat Patel; Arvind Mathur; Dolatrai M Vyas; John S Tokarski; Chiang Yu; Simone Oppenheimer; Hongjian Zhang; Punit Marathe; Joseph Fargnoli; Francis Y Lee; Tai W Wong; Gregory D Vite
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Activation of 3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine 1,4-dioxide antitumor agents to oxidizing species following their one-electron reduction.

Authors:  Robert F Anderson; Sujata S Shinde; Michael P Hay; Swarna A Gamage; William A Denny
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Hydrogen bonding in 2-amino-4-methoxy-6-methylpyrimidine, 2-benzylamino-4-benzyloxy-6-methylpyrimidine and 4-benzylamino-2,6-bis(benzyloxy)pyrimidine: pi-stacked chains of fused R22(8) rings, and centrosymmetric R22(8) dimers.

Authors:  Christopher Glidewell; John N Low; Manuel Melguizo; Antonio Quesada
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Tris(3-amino-5,6-dimethyl-1,2,4-triazine-κN)silver(I) trifluromethane-sulfonate-3-amino-5,6-dimethyl-1,2,4-triazine (1/1).

Authors:  Yu-Hang Jiang; Li-Na Cui; Xu Huang; Qiong-Hua Jin; Cun-Lin Zhang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-10-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.