Literature DB >> 22258940

Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version.

Catherine Cluver1, G Justus Hofmeyr, Gillian Ml Gyte, Marlene Sinclair.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breech presentation is associated with increased complications. Turning a breech baby to head first presentation using external cephalic version (ECV) attempts to reduce the chances of breech presentation at birth, and reduce the adverse effects of breech vaginal birth or caesarean section. Tocolytic drugs and other methods have been used in an attempt to facilitate ECV.
OBJECTIVES: To assess interventions such as tocolysis, fetal acoustic stimulation, regional analgesia, transabdominal amnioinfusion or systemic opioids on ECV for a breech baby at term. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2011) and the reference lists of identified studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing the above interventions with no intervention or other methods to facilitate ECV at term. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed eligibility and trial quality. Two review authors independently assessed for inclusion all potential studies identified as a result of the search strategy and independently extracted the data using a designed data extraction form. MAIN
RESULTS: We included 25 studies, providing data on 2548 women. We used the random-effects model for pooling data due to clinical heterogeneity in the included studies in the various comparisons. The overall quality of the evidence was reasonable, but a number of assessments had insufficient data to provide an answer with any degree of assurance.Tocolytic drugs, in particular betastimulants, were effective in increasing cephalic presentations in labour (average risk ratio (RR) 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.85, eight studies, 993 women) and in reducing the number of caesarean sections (average RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.94, eight studies, 1177 women). No differences were identified in fetal bradycardias (average RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.89, three studies, 467 women) although the review is underpowered for assessing this outcome. We identified no difference in success, cephalic presentation in labour and caesarean sections between nulliparous and multiparous women. There were insufficient data comparing different groups of tocolytic drugs. Sensitivity analyses by study quality agreed with the overall findings.Regional analgesia in combination with a tocolytic was more effective than the tocolytic alone in terms of increasing successful versions (assessed by the rate of failed ECVs, average RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.89, six studies, 550 women) but there was no difference identified in cephalic presentation in labour (average RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.75 to 3.53, three studies, 279 women) nor in caesarean sections (average RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.37, three studies, 279 women) or fetal bradycardia (average RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.62 to 3.57, two studies, 210 women).There were insufficient data on the use of vibroacoustic stimulation, amnioinfusion or systemic opioids. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Betastimulants, to facilitate ECV, increased cephalic presentation in labour and birth, and reduced the caesarean section rate in both nulliparous and multiparous women, but there were insufficient data on adverse effects. Calcium channel blockers and nitric acid donors had insufficient data to provide good evidence. At present we recommend betamimetics for facilitating ECV.There is scope for further research. The possible benefits of tocolysis to reduce the force required for successful version and the possible risks of maternal cardiovascular side effects, need to be addressed further. Further trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of routine versus selective use of tocolysis, the role of regional analgesia, fetal acoustic stimulation, amnioinfusion and the effect of intravenous or oral hydration prior to ECV.Although randomised trials of nitroglycerine are small, the results are sufficiently negative to discourage further trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22258940      PMCID: PMC4171393          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000184.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  49 in total

1.  The decreasing value of external cephalic version in modern obstetric practice.

Authors:  P J Bradley-Watson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The value of prophylactic external version in cases of breech presentation.

Authors:  A BROSSET
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1956       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.

Authors:  Roger M Harbord; Matthias Egger; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  External cephalic version for breech presentation with or without spinal analgesia in nulliparous women at term: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carolyn F Weiniger; Yehuda Ginosar; Uriel Elchalal; Einav Sharon; Malka Nokrian; Yossef Ezra
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Authors:  M Egger; G Davey Smith; M Schneider; C Minder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

6.  Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version?

Authors:  G P Marquette; M Boucher; D Thériault; D Rinfret
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Intravenous nitroglycerin as a tocolytic agent for intrapartum external cephalic version.

Authors:  M A Belfort
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1993-09

Review 8.  Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review.

Authors:  J Zhang; W A Bowes; J A Fortney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; M E Hannah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

10.  Intravenous salbutamol for external cephalic version.

Authors:  Subramaniam Vani; Soon Yen Lau; Boon Kiong Lim; Siti Zawiah Omar; Peng Chiong Tan
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.561

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Expedited versus conservative approaches for vaginal delivery in breech presentation.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Regina Kulier; Helen M West
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-21

Review 2.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: Cost analysis.

Authors:  Kelly Yamasato; Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Breech repositioning unresponsive to Webster technique: coexistence of oligohydramnios.

Authors:  Christopher B Roecker
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2013-06

Review 5.  External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Regina Kulier; Helen M West
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-01

6.  Women's experiences of planning a vaginal breech birth in Australia.

Authors:  Caroline Se Homer; Nicole P Watts; Karolina Petrovska; Chauncey M Sjostedt; Andrew Bisits
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Interventions to Improve Neonatal Health and Later Survival: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Zohra S Lassi; Philippa F Middleton; Caroline Crowther; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 8.143

8.  Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?

Authors:  Carolyn F Weiniger; Paul S Spencer; Yuval Weiss; Gary Ginsberg; Yossef Ezra
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-02-24

Review 9.  Improving external cephalic version for foetal breech presentation.

Authors:  H Zandstra; H J M M Mertens
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013

10.  Talcum powder or aqueous gel to aid external cephalic version: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Narayanan Vallikkannu; Wan Nordin Nadzratulaiman; Siti Zawiah Omar; Khaing Si Lay; Peng Chiong Tan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.