Literature DB >> 18055730

External cephalic version for breech presentation with or without spinal analgesia in nulliparous women at term: a randomized controlled trial.

Carolyn F Weiniger1, Yehuda Ginosar, Uriel Elchalal, Einav Sharon, Malka Nokrian, Yossef Ezra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the success of external cephalic version using spinal analgesia with no analgesia among nulliparas.
METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in a tertiary referral center delivery suite. Nulliparous women at term requesting external cephalic version for breech presentation were randomized to receive spinal analgesia (7.5 mg bupivacaine) or no analgesia before the external cephalic version. An experienced obstetrician performed the external cephalic version. Primary outcome was successful conversion to vertex presentation.
RESULTS: Seventy-four women were enrolled, and 70 analyzed (36 spinal, 34 no analgesia). Successful external cephalic version occurred among 24 of 36 (66.7%) women randomized to receive spinal analgesia compared with 11 of 34 (32.4%) without, P=.004 (95% confidence interval [CI] of the difference: 0.0954-0.5513). External cephalic version with spinal analgesia resulted in a lower visual analog pain score, 1.76+/-2.74 compared with 6.84+/-3.08 without, P<.001. A secondary analysis logistic regression model demonstrated that the odds of external cephalic version success was 4.0-fold higher when performed with spinal analgesia P=.02 (95% CI, odds ratio [OR] 1.2-12.9). Complete breech presentation before attempting external cephalic version increased the odds of success 8.2-fold, P=.001 (95% CI, OR 2.2-30.3). Placental position, estimated fetal weight, and maternal weight did not contribute to the success rate when spinal analgesia was used. There were no cases of placental abruption or fetal distress.
CONCLUSION: Administration of spinal analgesia significantly increases the success rate of external cephalic version among nulliparous women at term, which allows possible normal vaginal delivery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00119184 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18055730     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000295605.38175.7b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version.

Authors:  Catherine Cluver; G Justus Hofmeyr; Gillian Ml Gyte; Marlene Sinclair
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

2.  Coming out ahead: the cost effectiveness of external cephalic version using spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  James A O'Brien; Eli Y Adashi
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-02-24

3.  Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?

Authors:  Carolyn F Weiniger; Paul S Spencer; Yuval Weiss; Gary Ginsberg; Yossef Ezra
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-02-24

4.  Remifentanil analgesia during external cephalic version for breech presentation in nulliparous women at term: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhi-Hong Wang; Yi Yang; Gui-Ping Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Central neuraxial blockade-assisted external cephalic version in reducing caesarean section rate: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Bolaji; Lillian Alabi-Isama
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009-12-23

6.  A randomized trial of remifentanil for analgesia in external cephalic version for breech presentation.

Authors:  Xiaohua Liu; Aiqin Xue
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Anesthesia efficacy of bupivacaine in pregnant participants with breech presentation receiving external cephalic version: A protocol of systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xin-Hua Mu; Hai-Xia Shi; Ran An
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials of Neuraxial, Intravenous, and Inhalational Anesthesia for External Cephalic Version.

Authors:  Qingzhong Hao; Yirui Hu; Li Zhang; John Ross; Sarah Robishaw; Christine Noble; Xianren Wu; Xiaopeng Zhang
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.627

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.