Literature DB >> 22258915

Principal component analysis of cerebellar shape on MRI separates SCA types 2 and 6 into two archetypal modes of degeneration.

Brian C Jung1, Soo I Choi, Annie X Du, Jennifer L Cuzzocreo, Zhuo Z Geng, Howard S Ying, Susan L Perlman, Arthur W Toga, Jerry L Prince, Sarah H Ying.   

Abstract

Although "cerebellar ataxia" is often used in reference to a disease process, presumably there are different underlying pathogenetic mechanisms for different subtypes. Indeed, spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) types 2 and 6 demonstrate complementary phenotypes, thus predicting a different anatomic pattern of degeneration. Here, we show that an unsupervised classification method, based on principal component analysis (PCA) of cerebellar shape characteristics, can be used to separate SCA2 and SCA6 into two classes, which may represent disease-specific archetypes. Patients with SCA2 (n=11) and SCA6 (n=7) were compared against controls (n=15) using PCA to classify cerebellar anatomic shape characteristics. Within the first three principal components, SCA2 and SCA6 differed from controls and from each other. In a secondary analysis, we studied five additional subjects and found that these patients were consistent with the previously defined archetypal clusters of clinical and anatomical characteristics. Secondary analysis of five subjects with related diagnoses showed that disease groups that were clinically and pathophysiologically similar also shared similar anatomic characteristics. Specifically, Archetype #1 consisted of SCA3 (n=1) and SCA2, suggesting that cerebellar syndromes accompanied by atrophy of the pons may be associated with a characteristic pattern of cerebellar neurodegeneration. In comparison, Archetype #2 was comprised of disease groups with pure cerebellar atrophy (episodic ataxia type 2 (n=1), idiopathic late-onset cerebellar ataxias (n=3), and SCA6). This suggests that cerebellar shape analysis could aid in discriminating between different pathologies. Our findings further suggest that magnetic resonance imaging is a promising imaging biomarker that could aid in the diagnosis and therapeutic management in patients with cerebellar syndromes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22258915      PMCID: PMC3932524          DOI: 10.1007/s12311-011-0334-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  20 in total

1.  Measuring Friedreich ataxia: Interrater reliability of a neurologic rating scale.

Authors:  S H Subramony; W May; D Lynch; C Gomez; K Fischbeck; M Hallett; P Taylor; R Wilson; T Ashizawa
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Antigenic compartmentation of the cerebellar cortex in the chicken (Gallus domesticus).

Authors:  Hassan Marzban; Seung-Hyuk Chung; Maryam Kherad Pezhouh; Hans Feirabend; Masahiko Watanabe; Jan Voogd; Richard Hawkes
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Further observations on the cerebellar projections from the pontine nuclei and the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P Brodal
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1982-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  The mossy fiber projection of the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis to the flocculus and adjacent ventral paraflocculus in the cat.

Authors:  N M Gerrits; A H Epema; J Voogd
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Cerebellar targets of visual pontine cells in the cat.

Authors:  F R Robinson; J L Cohen; J May; A K Sestokas; M Glickstein
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-03-10       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  The pontocerebellar projection of the uvula in the cat.

Authors:  A Brodal; G H Hoddevik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The ponto-cerebellar projection in the rat: differential projections to sublobules of the uvula.

Authors:  L M Eisenman; C R Noback
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  MRI shows a region-specific pattern of atrophy in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2.

Authors:  Brian C Jung; Soo I Choi; Annie X Du; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Howard S Ying; Bennett A Landman; Susan L Perlman; Robert W Baloh; David S Zee; Arthur W Toga; Jerry L Prince; Sarah H Ying
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Deranged calcium signaling and neurodegeneration in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Tie-Shan Tang; Huiping Tu; Omar Nelson; Emily Herndon; Duong P Huynh; Stefan M Pulst; Ilya Bezprozvanny
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Visual pontocerebellar projections in the macaque.

Authors:  M Glickstein; N Gerrits; I Kralj-Hans; B Mercier; J Stein; J Voogd
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  8 in total

1.  Consensus paper: radiological biomarkers of cerebellar diseases.

Authors:  Leonardo Baldarçara; Stuart Currie; M Hadjivassiliou; Nigel Hoggard; Allison Jack; Andrea P Jackowski; Mario Mascalchi; Cecilia Parazzini; Kathrin Reetz; Andrea Righini; Jörg B Schulz; Alessandra Vella; Sara Jane Webb; Christophe Habas
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Landmark Based Shape Analysis for Cerebellar Ataxia Classification and Cerebellar Atrophy Pattern Visualization.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; S Mazdak Abulnaga; Aaron Carass; Kalyani Kansal; Bruno M Jedynak; Chiadi Onyike; Sarah H Ying; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-21

3.  Deep Learning for Cerebellar Ataxia Classification and Functional Score Regression.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Shenghua Zhong; Aaron Carass; Sarah H Ying; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Mach Learn Med Imaging       Date:  2014

4.  Automated cerebellar lobule segmentation with application to cerebellar structural analysis in cerebellar disease.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Chuyang Ye; John A Bogovic; Aaron Carass; Bruno M Jedynak; Sarah H Ying; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Altered Capicua expression drives regional Purkinje neuron vulnerability through ion channel gene dysregulation in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1.

Authors:  Ravi Chopra; David D Bushart; John P Cooper; Dhananjay Yellajoshyula; Logan M Morrison; Haoran Huang; Hillary P Handler; Luke J Man; Warunee Dansithong; Daniel R Scoles; Stefan M Pulst; Harry T Orr; Vikram G Shakkottai
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Macro- and microstructural changes in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: assessment of phylogenetic subdivisions of the cerebellum and the brain stem.

Authors:  K Sato; K Ishigame; S H Ying; K Oishi; M I Miller; S Mori
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Gross feature recognition of Anatomical Images based on Atlas grid (GAIA): Incorporating the local discrepancy between an atlas and a target image to capture the features of anatomic brain MRI.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Qin; Johnny T Hsu; Shoko Yoshida; Andreia V Faria; Kumiko Oishi; Paul G Unschuld; Graham W Redgrave; Sarah H Ying; Christopher A Ross; Peter C M van Zijl; Argye E Hillis; Marilyn S Albert; Constantine G Lyketsos; Michael I Miller; Susumu Mori; Kenichi Oishi
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Progression of brain atrophy in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2: a longitudinal tensor-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Mario Mascalchi; Stefano Diciotti; Marco Giannelli; Andrea Ginestroni; Andrea Soricelli; Emanuele Nicolai; Marco Aiello; Carlo Tessa; Lucia Galli; Maria Teresa Dotti; Silvia Piacentini; Elena Salvatore; Nicola Toschi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.