Michel Rayar1, Laurent Sulpice, Bernard Meunier, Karim Boudjema. 1. Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France. michel.rayar@laposte.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Our retrospective study aimed to evaluate the influence of enteral nutrition (EN) on DGE incidence after standard PD with antrectomy and Child reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 275 consecutive patients who underwent standard PD between January 2000 and September 2009. Patients operated on after January 2005 received EN (EN group, n = 152) until total oral alimentation. Patients operated on prior to 2005 did not receive EN (control group, n = 123) and were orally fed after removing the nasogastric tube. Primary endpoint was the incidence of DGE according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of any other complications. RESULTS: The incidence of DGE was 26% vs. 38% (p = 0.04) in the EN and control groups, respectively, with 17% vs. 19% for grade B DGE (NS) and 9% vs. 19% for grade C DGE (p = 0.02). The differences in DGE did not significantly decrease the duration of stay (18 ± 11 vs. 19 ± 13 days; NS). Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was significantly reduced in the EN group (8% vs. 20%, p = 0.008), with the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula being similar in both groups (15% vs. 12%; NS). Using multivariate analysis, EN (p = 0.047, OR = 0.559 [0.315; 0.994]), operative time (p < 0.001, OR = 1.007 [1.003; 1.010]), and patient age (p = 0.014, OR = 1.031 [1.006; 1.057]) were independent factors affecting the incidence of DGE. CONCLUSIONS: EN reduces DGE and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after PD.
BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Our retrospective study aimed to evaluate the influence of enteral nutrition (EN) on DGE incidence after standard PD with antrectomy and Child reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 275 consecutive patients who underwent standard PD between January 2000 and September 2009. Patients operated on after January 2005 received EN (EN group, n = 152) until total oral alimentation. Patients operated on prior to 2005 did not receive EN (control group, n = 123) and were orally fed after removing the nasogastric tube. Primary endpoint was the incidence of DGE according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of any other complications. RESULTS: The incidence of DGE was 26% vs. 38% (p = 0.04) in the EN and control groups, respectively, with 17% vs. 19% for grade B DGE (NS) and 9% vs. 19% for grade C DGE (p = 0.02). The differences in DGE did not significantly decrease the duration of stay (18 ± 11 vs. 19 ± 13 days; NS). Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was significantly reduced in the EN group (8% vs. 20%, p = 0.008), with the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula being similar in both groups (15% vs. 12%; NS). Using multivariate analysis, EN (p = 0.047, OR = 0.559 [0.315; 0.994]), operative time (p < 0.001, OR = 1.007 [1.003; 1.010]), and patient age (p = 0.014, OR = 1.031 [1.006; 1.057]) were independent factors affecting the incidence of DGE. CONCLUSIONS: EN reduces DGE and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after PD.
Authors: Dong K Kim; Alexander A Hindenburg; Sushil K Sharma; Chang Ho Suk; Frank G Gress; Harry Staszewski; James H Grendell; William P Reed Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2005-03-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Hartwig Riediger; Frank Makowiec; Wolfgang D Schareck; Ulrich T Hopt; Ulrich Adam Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Judit Hallay; Cs Micskei; B Fülesdi; G Kovács; Zs Szentkereszty; I Takács; S Sipka; E Bodolay; P Sápy Journal: Hepatogastroenterology Date: 2008 May-Jun
Authors: Arja Gerritsen; Roos A W Wennink; Marc G H Besselink; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Dorine S J Tseng; Elles Steenhagen; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; I Quintus Molenaar Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Courtney L Scaife; Kelly C Hewitt; Mary C Mone; Heidi J Hansen; Edward T Nelson; Sean J Mulvihill Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 3.647