| Literature DB >> 22257447 |
Matej Orešič1, Tuulikki Seppänen-Laakso, Daqiang Sun, Jing Tang, Sebastian Therman, Rachael Viehman, Ulla Mustonen, Theo G van Erp, Tuulia Hyötyläinen, Paul Thompson, Arthur W Toga, Matti O Huttunen, Jaana Suvisaari, Jaakko Kaprio, Jouko Lönnqvist, Tyrone D Cannon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several theories have been proposed to conceptualize the pathological processes inherent to schizophrenia. The 'prostaglandin deficiency' hypothesis postulates that defective enzyme systems converting essential fatty acids to prostaglandins lead to diminished levels of prostaglandins, which in turn affect synaptic transmission.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22257447 PMCID: PMC3334549 DOI: 10.1186/gm300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Med ISSN: 1756-994X Impact factor: 11.117
Demographic and metabolic characteristics of the study population, shown for patients, their unaffected co-twins, patients and their co-twins combined (discordant twin pairs), and the controls
| Characteristic | Controls | Unaffected co-twins | Patients | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34 | 19 | 19 | ||
| Monozygotic | 20 (10 pairs) | 7 | 7 | |
| Female | 24 | 13 | 13 | |
| Age (years)a | 53.4 (50.2, 56.6) | 51.0 (46.4, 55.6) | 51.0 (46.4, 55.6) | |
| Diabetes | 0 | 1 | 7 | |
| Antipsychotic medication (atypical antipsychotics)b | 0 | 0 | 15 (14) | |
| Cholesterol medication | 2 | 0 | 6 | |
| BMI | 25.4 (23.8, 27.0)** | 25.7 (24.0, 27.5)** | 29.2 (26.5, 31.9) | 0.020 |
| Insulinc | 7.7 (5.9, 9.9) | 8.9 (6.9, 11.6)* | 14.1 (9.1, 21.7) | 0.085 |
| Glucosec | 5.07 (4.78, 5.38) | 5.30 (4.54, 6.19) | 5.76 (4.87, 6.80) | 0.40 |
| HOMA-IRc | 1.72 (1.30, 2.29) | 2.11 (1.52, 2.93)** | 3.61 (2.22, 5.86) | 0.062 |
aData for this and other variables are shown as mean (95% confidence interval). bAccording to self-report. cGeometric means and confidence intervals; statistics estimated from log10-transformed data. *P < 0.1, **P < 0.05 (post-hoc analysis using Tukey all-pair comparisons versus the patient group; no comparisons were significant between the controls and unaffected co-twins). BMI, body mass index; HOMA-IR, Homeostasis Model Assessment index.
Description of lipid clusters obtained from lipidomics platform
| Cluster name | Cluster size | Description | Representative abundant lipids | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC1 | 68 | Mainly ether lipids | PE(36:6e), PC(34:4e) | 0.39 |
| LC2 | 211 | Sphingomyelins, major phospholipids | SM(d18:1/18:0), SM(d18:1/24:1), PC(34:2) | 0.69 |
| LC3 | 49 | PUFA-containing PCs and PEs | PC(38:6), PE(38:5) | 0.91 |
| LC4 | 25 | LysoPCs | lysoPC(18:0), lysoPC(20:3) | 0.096a |
| LC5 | 76 | Abundant TGs | TG(16:0/18:1/18:1), TG(18:1/18:2/18:1) | 0.061b |
| LC6 | 35 | Long-chain TGs; PUFA-containing TGs | TG(56:6), TG(58:8), TG(58:9) | 0.25 |
| LC7 | 66 | Mainly shorter-chain SFAs and MUFA-containing TGs | TG(14:0/16:0/18:1), TG(14:0/16:0/18:0) | 0.65 |
aTukey's all-pair comparison: P = 0.12 (patients versus co-twins), P = 0.078 (co-twins versus controls), P = 0.56 (patients versus controls). bTukey's all-pair comparison: P = 0.039 (patients versus co-twins), P = 0.44 (co-twins versus controls), P = 0.24 (patients versus controls). LC, LC, lipid cluster; lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; SFA, saturated fatty acid; SM, sphingomyelin; TG, triglyceride.
Figure 1Lipid levels across the three study groups, as obtained from the lipidomics platform. (a) Mean lipid levels within each cluster. Error marks show standard error of the mean. The F-test (across the three groups) P-values are shown. (b) Profiles of selected representative abundant lipids from three clusters. lysoPC(16:0) and lysoPC(18:0) are the two most abundant lysophosphatidylcholines measured in plasma. The lipid levels are shown as beanplots [22], which provide information on the mean level (solid line), individual data points (short lines), and the density of the distribution. Note that the concentration scale in beanplots is logarithmic. Tukey all-pair comparison post-hoc test: patients versus co-twins (*P < 0.1, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001), patients versus controls (†P < 0.1, ††P < 0.05, †††P < 0.01). No significant differences were found when comparing co-twins and controls. CoTw, unaffected co-twins; Ctr, controls; Sch, patients.
Figure 2Dependency network of variables related to schizophrenia. The network was constructed from the selected clinical, lipid cluster, MR image (with selected independent components shown), and neurocognitive assessment data. Node shapes represent different types of variables, node color corresponds to significance and direction of regulation comparing patients versus unaffected co-twins, and line width is proportional to strength of dependency. The cutoff for the presence of edge was set at β = 0.40 by the average non-rejection rate, that is, an edge in the graph was tested positive in 40% of the 500 samplings. The existing edges should be interpreted as direct associations between the pairs of variables. HOMA-IR, Homeostasis Model Assessment index; NS, not significant.
Figure 3Significant correlations between lipid levels and cortical gray matter density. LysoPC(18:0) level is positively correlated with gray matter density mainly in right precentral gyrus, anterior cingulate areas, and medial parietal and occipital surfaces. The triglyceride cluster LC5 is positively correlated with gray matter density in lateral temporal surfaces on both sides and medial occipital and parietal surfaces on the right side. These results were confirmed using permutation tests.