Literature DB >> 22256081

Effects of spatial and temporal parameters of primary afferent microstimulation on neural responses evoked in primary somatosensory cortex of an anesthetized cat.

James A Hokanson1, Christopher A Ayers, Robert A Gaunt, Tim M Bruns, Douglas J Weber.   

Abstract

Patterned microstimulation of muscle and cutaneous afferent neurons may provide tactile and proprioceptive feedback to users of advanced prosthetic limbs. However, it is unclear what types of stimulation patterns will be effective, and the parameter space for creating these patterns is prohibitively large to explore systematically using only psychophysics paradigms. In this study, we used an array of microelectrodes in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of an isoflurane anesthetized cat to measure responses in a population of neurons evoked by various patterns of primary afferent microstimulation delivered to the L6 and L7 dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Each pattern consisted of a 300 ms train of microstimulation pulses having a fixed amplitude, pulse rate, and location in the array of DRG electrodes. Evoked responses were detectable on many S1 channels at the lowest amplitude tested (5 μA) and pulse rate (10 pulses per second). Increasing the pulse rate lowered the threshold amplitude for evoking a response on some S1 channels. Location effects were also observed. Adjacent stimulation sites evoked discriminable responses at low but not high (20 μA) amplitudes. In summary, we observed interactions between stimulation pulse rate, pulse amplitude, and location. Such interactions must be considered when designing stimulation patterns for transmitting sensory feedback by primary afferent microstimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22256081      PMCID: PMC3475719          DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  6 in total

1.  Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: implications for neural control of artificial limbs.

Authors:  Gurpreet S Dhillon; Stephen M Lawrence; Douglas T Hutchinson; Kenneth W Horch
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Human ability to discriminate various parameters in afferent electrical nerve stimulation with particular reference to prostheses sensory feedback.

Authors:  A B Anani; K Ikeda; L M Körner
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand.

Authors:  J Ochoa; E Torebjörk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Perceptual responses to microstimulation of single afferents innervating joints, muscles and skin of the human hand.

Authors:  G Macefield; S C Gandevia; D Burke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  A rostrocaudal somatotopic organization in the brachial dorsal root ganglia of neonatal rats.

Authors:  W J Wessels; E Marani
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.876

6.  Microstimulation of primary afferent neurons in the L7 dorsal root ganglia using multielectrode arrays in anesthetized cats: thresholds and recruitment properties.

Authors:  R A Gaunt; J A Hokanson; D J Weber
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.379

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comparing temporal aspects of visual, tactile, and microstimulation feedback for motor control.

Authors:  Jason M Godlove; Erin O Whaite; Aaron P Batista
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Flexible microelectrode array for interfacing with the surface of neural ganglia.

Authors:  Zachariah J Sperry; Kyounghwan Na; Saman S Parizi; Hillel J Chiel; John Seymour; Euisik Yoon; Tim M Bruns
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Multi-electrode stimulation in somatosensory cortex increases probability of detection.

Authors:  Boubker Zaaimi; Ricardo Ruiz-Torres; Sara A Solla; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.