Literature DB >> 22254290

Assessment of cardiac function during mechanical circulatory support: the quest for a suitable clinical index.

Antonio L Ferreira1, Yajuan Wang, John Gorcsan, James F Antaki.   

Abstract

A new index to assess left ventricular (LV) function in patients implanted with continuous flow left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is proposed. Derived from the pump flow signal, this index is defined as the coefficient (k) of the semilogarithmic relationship between "pseudo-ejection" fraction (pEF) and the volume discharged by the pump in diastole, (V d). pEF is defined as the ratio of the "pseudo-stroke volume" (pSV) to V d. The pseudo-stroke volume is the difference between V d and the volume discharged by the pump in systole (V s), both obtained by integrating pump flow with respect to time in a cardiac cycle. k was compared in-vivo with others two indices: the LV pressure-based index, M(TP), and the pump flow-based index, I(Q). M(TP) is the slope of the linear regression between the "triple-product" and end-diastolic pressure, EDP. The triple-product, TP = LV SP.dP/dt(max). HR, is the product of LV systolic pressure, maximum time-derivative of LV pressure, and heart rate. I(Q) is the slope of the linear regression between maximum time-derivative of pump flow, dQ/dt(max), and pump flow peak-to-peak amplitude variation, Q(P2P). To test the response of k to contractile state changes, contractility was altered through pharmacological interventions. The absolute value of k decreased from 1.354 ± 0.25 (baseline) to 0.685 ± 0.21 after esmolol infusion. The proposed index is sensitive to changes in inotropic state, and has the potential to be used clinically to assess contractile function of patients implanted with VAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22254290      PMCID: PMC3265331          DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  11 in total

1.  Relationship of blood pressure and pump flow in an implantable centrifugal blood pump during hypertension.

Authors:  T Akimoto; K Yamazaki; P Litwak; K N Litwak; O Tagusari; T Mori; J F Antaki; M V Kameneva; M J Watach; M Umezu; J Tomioka; R L Kormos; H Koyanagi; B P Griffith
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Echocardiographic assessment of flow across continuous-flow ventricular assist devices at low speeds.

Authors:  Robert S George; Nikant K Sabharwal; Carole Webb; Magdi H Yacoub; Christopher T Bowles; Michael Hedger; Asghar Khaghani; Emma J Birks
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Pressure-volume analysis during axial flow ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Patrick I McConnell; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  Modeling ventricular function during cardiac assist: does time-varying elastance work?

Authors:  Stijn Vandenberghe; Patrick Segers; Paul Steendijk; Bart Meyns; Robert A E Dion; James F Antaki; Pascal Verdonck
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Assessment of cardiac function during axial-flow left ventricular assist device support using a left ventricular pressure-derived relationship: comparison with pre-load recruitable stroke work.

Authors:  Patrick I McConnell; Carlos L Del Rio; Pawel Kwiatkowski; David J Farrar; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Continuous assessment of cardiac function during rotary blood pump support: a contractility index derived from pump flow.

Authors:  Phornphop Naiyanetr; Francesco Moscato; Michael Vollkron; Daniel Zimpfer; Georg Wieselthaler; Heinrich Schima
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 7.  Evaluation of native left ventricular function during mechanical circulatory support: theoretical basis and clinical limitations.

Authors:  Tohru Sakamoto
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.520

8.  Evaluation of myocardial function in patients with end-stage heart failure during support with the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Markus Ferrari; Kamuran A Kadipasaoglu; Mihai Croitoru; Jeff Conger; Tim Myers; Igor Gregoric; Branislav Radovancevic; George V Letsou; O H Frazier
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; David Feldman; Benjamin Sun; Antone J Tatooles; Reynolds M Delgado; James W Long; Thomas C Wozniak; Waqas Ghumman; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Impact of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support on the cardiac reverse remodeling process.

Authors:  Stefan Klotz; A H Jan Danser; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.667

View more
  1 in total

1.  Anesthetic management of a patient with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a case report.

Authors:  Shihoko Iwata; Sumire Yokokawa; Mihoshi Sato; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.217

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.