Literature DB >> 19782591

Continuous assessment of cardiac function during rotary blood pump support: a contractility index derived from pump flow.

Phornphop Naiyanetr1, Francesco Moscato, Michael Vollkron, Daniel Zimpfer, Georg Wieselthaler, Heinrich Schima.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical application of rotary blood pumps (RBPs) for bridge-to-recovery and destination therapy has focused interest on the remaining contractile function of the heart and its course. This study reports a method to determine contractility that uses readily measured variables of the RBP.
METHOD: The proposed index (I(Q)) is defined as the slope of a linear regression between the maximum derivative of the pump flow and its peak-to-peak value. I(Q) was compared with the maximal derivative of ventricular pressure (dP/dt(max)) vs end-diastolic volume (EDV) and the pre-load-recruitable stroke work. All indices were evaluated using computer simulations and animal experiments. For in vivo studies, a MicroMed-DeBakey ventricular assist device (VAD) was implanted in 7 healthy sheep. Ventricular contractility was examined under normal conditions and after pharmacologic intervention. For the computer simulation, variations of ventricular contractility, ventricular pre-load and after-load, and pump speeds were studied.
RESULTS: In vivo and computer simulations showed the I(Q) index to be sensitive to changes of cardiac contractility, similar to other classic indices. For reduced cardiac contractility, it decreased to 9.3 +/- 3.9 (s(-1)) vs 15.3 +/- 4.0 (s(-1)) in the control condition (in vivo experiments). The I(Q) index was only marginally influenced by pre-load and after-load changes: a variation of 7.0% +/- 8.9% and 1.3% +/- 7.1%, respectively, was observed in computer simulations.
CONCLUSIONS: The I(Q) index, which can be derived from pump data only, is a useful parameter for continuous monitoring of the cardiac contractility in patients with RBP support. Copyright (c) 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19782591     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  8 in total

1.  Mechanical circulatory support device-heart hysteretic interaction can predict left ventricular end diastolic pressure.

Authors:  Brian Y Chang; Steven P Keller; Sonya S Bhavsar; Noam Josephy; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  The left ventricular assist device as a patient monitoring system.

Authors:  Francesco Moscato; Christoph Gross; Martin Maw; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Marcus Granegger; Daniel Zimpfer; Heinrich Schima
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

3.  Assessment of cardiac function during mechanical circulatory support: the quest for a suitable clinical index.

Authors:  Antonio L Ferreira; Yajuan Wang; John Gorcsan; James F Antaki
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

4.  A Scalable Approach to Determine Intracardiac Pressure From Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Signals.

Authors:  Brian Y Chang; Christian Moyer; Ahmad El Katerji; Steven P Keller; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Hysteretic device characteristics indicate cardiac contractile state for guiding mechanical circulatory support device use.

Authors:  Brian Y Chang; Zhengyang Zhang; Steven P Keller; Elazer R Edelman; Kimberly Feng; Noam Josephy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-12-20

6.  Continuous LVAD monitoring reveals high suction rates in clinically stable outpatients.

Authors:  Christoph Gross; Heinrich Schima; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Kamen Dimitrov; Martin Maw; Julia Riebandt; Dominik Wiedemann; Daniel Zimpfer; Francesco Moscato
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.094

7.  Finite state machine implementation for left ventricle modeling and control.

Authors:  Jacob M King; Clint A Bergeron; Charles E Taylor
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Hemodynamic exercise responses with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Comparison of patients' response and cardiorespiratory simulations.

Authors:  Christoph Gross; Libera Fresiello; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Kamen Dimitrov; Christiane Marko; Martin Maw; Bart Meyns; Dominik Wiedemann; Daniel Zimpfer; Heinrich Schima; Francesco Moscato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.