| Literature DB >> 22254084 |
Ruben Hummelen1, Jaimie Hemsworth, John Changalucha, Nicodemus L Butamanya, Sharareh Hekmat, J Dik F Habbema, Gregor Reid.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Micronutrient supplementation has been shown to reduce the progression of HIV but does not have an effect on the intestinal barrier or the intestinal microbiota of HIV patients. Studies have suggested that probiotics could potentially complement micronutrients in preserving the immune-function of HIV patients.Entities:
Keywords: micronutrients; HIV; Lactobacillus; immune system; probiotics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22254084 PMCID: PMC3257740 DOI: 10.3390/nu3100897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Probiotic and micronutrient content of the yogurts.
| Ingredient | Amount/125 g |
|---|---|
| 109 CFU/mL | |
| Vitamin A (as Beta carotene and Palmitate) | 1500 IU |
| Vitamin E (as acetate) | 5.7 IU |
| Niacinamide | 3.8 mg |
| Vitamin B1 (thiamin) | 0.3 mg |
| Vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) | 0.6 μg |
| Vitamin B6 (pyroxine) | 0.3 mg |
| Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) | 21 mg |
| Iron (as ferric pyrophosphate) | 3.3 mg |
| Selenium (sodium selenite) | 13.8 μg |
| Zinc (zinc sulphate) | 2.4 mg |
| DHA (omega-3 from fish oil) | 13 mg |
| EPA (omega-3 from fish oil) | 19 mg |
CFU = Colony forming units; * Only in probiotic-supplemented yogurt.
Figure 1Trial profile.
Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups. In a few cases, data were not obtained.
| Characteristic a | Reference | Probiotics | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender female | 47 (86%) | 48 (86%) | 1.0 | |
| Age (years) | <30 | 10 (19%) | 8 (15%) | 0.6 |
| ≥30 | 44 (81%) | 46 (85%) | ||
| Water source | Pipe | 45 (83%) | 41 (73%) | 0.2 |
| Well | 9 (17%) | 15 (27%) | ||
| Working ability | Unable | 5 (10%) | 5 (9%) | 1.0 |
| Able | 47 (90%) | 51 (91%) | ||
| Marital status b | Widow | 18 (33%) | 24 (43%) | 0.8 |
| Divorced | 12 (22%) | 16 (28%) | ||
| Married | 19 (34%) | 15 (27%) | ||
| Single | 6 (11%) | 1 (2%) | ||
| Diagnosed with HIV (years) | <1 | 18 (33%) | 22 (39%) | 0.5 |
| ≥1 | 37 (67%) | 34 (61%) | ||
| CD4 Count (cells/mm3) | <350 | 26 (47%) | 30 (54%) | 0.5 |
| 351-500 | 12 (22%) | 14 (25%) | ||
| ≥501 | 17 (31%) | 12 (21%) | ||
| WHO disease stage b | 1 | 39 (75%) | 45 (80%) | 0.5 |
| 2 | 5 (10%) | 4 (7%) | ||
| 3 | 8 (15%) | 7 (13%) | ||
| Any HIV related symptom c | 21 (38%) | 12 (21%) | 0.03 | |
| BMI | <18.5 kg/m2 | 1 (2%) | 6 (11%) | 0.1 |
| Anemia (Hemoglobin) | <110 g/L | 22 (40%) d | 21 (38%) | 0.6 |
| Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin) | <36 g/L | 43 (78%) e | 49 (88%) | 0.4 |
| Clotrimoxazole use | 16 (29%) | 12 (21%) | 0.4 | |
| Vitamin B complex use | 6 (11%) | 4 (7%) | 0.5 |
BMI = Body Mass Index. a The following categories have missing values: Age (3), water source (1), Functional Status (3), BMI (4), WHO disease stage (3), Any HIV related symptom (3). b The following subgroups were combined for valid testing: Marital status: “Widow” with “divorced” with “single”; WHO disease stage: stage “2” with “3”; c Any HIV related symptom = oral thrush, oral ulcers or maculo-papular rash on physical examination. As not all data could be obtained, some of the calculations in the table are not for the full 55 or 56 participatants; d there were missing biological samples for 8 of the participants at baseline in the probiotic group, i.e.,22 of 47 showed low hemoglobin levels in the probiotic group; e there were two missing samples for albumin in the probiotic group.
Changes in hematology and biochemistry parameters from baseline to follow-up.
| Probiotics | Control | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Reference | Base a | FU | % Change b | Base | FU | % Change | |
| Value/unit | n/total | n/total | mean ± SD | n/total | n/total | mean ± SD | ||
| Creatinine | ≥139 μmol/L | 1/52 | 0/50 | −1 ± 17 | 0/56 | 1/56 | 1 ± 29 | 0.6 |
| Albumin | <36 g/L | 43/53 | 46/50 | 0 ± 20 | 49/56 | 51/56 | −1 ± 24 | 0.9 |
| ALT | ≥50 IU/L | 2/53 | 2/50 | −3 ± 9 | 2/56 | 1/56 | 1 ± 10 | 0.1 |
| Hemoglobin | <110 g/L | 22/47 | 19/43 | −9 ± 53 | 21/50 | 17/47 | 4 ± 53 | 0.3 |
| Platelets | <150 × 109/L | 3/47 | 3/43 | −13 ± 47 | 4/50 | 4/47 | −5 ± 23 | 0.3 |
| RBC | <4 × 1012/L | 29/47 | 17/43 | −10 ± 53 | 33/50 | 14/47 | −6 ± 66 | 0.7 |
| WBC | ≥11 × 109/L | 0/48 | 0/43 | −1 ± 18 | 1/50 | 0/47 | −7 ± 21 | 0.2 |
| Neutrophils | ≥80% | 0/44 | 0/37 | −6 ± 38 | 0/46 | 0/45 | −12 ± 72 | 0.6 |
| Lymphocytes | ≥50% | 13/47 | 13/43 | −6 ± 36 | 11/50 | 14/47 | 10 ± 72 | 0.2 |
| Monocytes | ≥10% | 0/47 | 0/43 | 1 ± 12 | 0/50 | 0/47 | −1 ± 15 | 0.6 |
| Eosinophils | ≥5% | 23/44 | 19/37 | −7 ± 16 | 26/46 | 28/45 | −1 ± 12 | 0.1 |
| Basophils | ≥2% | 0/47 | 0/43 | −2 ± 4 | 0/50 | 0/47 | −1 ± 4 | 0.1 |
Base = Baseline; FU = Follow-up; SD = Standard Deviation; ALT = Alanine transaminase; RBC = Red blood cells; WBC = White blood cells; a Number of participants above or below reference value; b Mean within-subject change from baseline to follow-up; c Tested using within-subject change from baseline to follow-up.