Literature DB >> 22253297

Common variation in Nemo-like kinase is associated with risk of ovarian cancer.

Kristen N Stevens1, Linda E Kelemen, Xianshu Wang, Brooke L Fridley, Robert A Vierkant, Zachary Fredericksen, Sebastian M Armasu, Ya-Yu Tsai, Andrew Berchuck, Steven A Narod, Catherine M Phelan, Rebecca Sutphen, Michael J Birrer, Joellen M Schildkraut, Thomas A Sellers, Ellen L Goode, Fergus J Couch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overexpression of mitotic kinases has been associated with prognosis, histologic grade, and clinical stage in ovarian cancer, but the relationship between inherited variation in these genes and ovarian cancer risk has not been well defined.
METHODS: We measured associations between 397 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 67 mitotic kinases and invasive epithelial ovarian cancer risk in two case-control studies (n = 671 cases; n = 939 controls). Thirty-six candidate SNPs (P < 0.05) were assessed in a replication analysis consisting of three additional studies (n = 1,094 cases; n = 829 controls).
RESULTS: In initial analysis, thirty-six SNPs were suggestive of association with risk of serous ovarian cancer, all subtypes of ovarian cancer, or both (P < 0.05). Replication analyses suggested an association between rs2125846 in the Nemo-like kinase (NLK) gene and ovarian cancer (serous OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.11-1.67, P = 1.77 × 10(-3); all subtypes OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.08-1.56, P = 2.97 × 10(-3)). Furthermore, rs2125846 was associated with risk in the combined discovery and replication sets (serous OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.15-1.54; all subtypes OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12-1.45).
CONCLUSIONS: Variation in NLK may be associated with risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm and understand the biologic relationship between this mitotic kinase and ovarian cancer risk. IMPACT: An association between SNPs in NLK and ovarian cancer may provide biologic insight into the development of this disease. ©2012 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22253297      PMCID: PMC3297683          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  27 in total

Review 1.  Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints.

Authors:  E A Nigg
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Genome-wide survey of protein kinases required for cell cycle progression.

Authors:  M Bettencourt-Dias; R Giet; R Sinka; A Mazumdar; W G Lock; F Balloux; P J Zafiropoulos; S Yamaguchi; S Winter; R W Carthew; M Cooper; D Jones; L Frenz; D M Glover
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer at 2q31 and 8q24.

Authors:  Ellen L Goode; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Honglin Song; Susan J Ramus; Maria Notaridou; Kate Lawrenson; Martin Widschwendter; Robert A Vierkant; Melissa C Larson; Susanne K Kjaer; Michael J Birrer; Andrew Berchuck; Joellen Schildkraut; Ian Tomlinson; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Linda S Cook; Jacek Gronwald; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Martin E Gore; Ian Campbell; Alice S Whittemore; Rebecca Sutphen; Catherine Phelan; Hoda Anton-Culver; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Diether Lambrechts; Mary Anne Rossing; Jenny Chang-Claude; Kirsten B Moysich; Marc T Goodman; Thilo Dörk; Heli Nevanlinna; Roberta B Ness; Thorunn Rafnar; Claus Hogdall; Estrid Hogdall; Brooke L Fridley; Julie M Cunningham; Weiva Sieh; Valerie McGuire; Andrew K Godwin; Daniel W Cramer; Dena Hernandez; Douglas Levine; Karen Lu; Edwin S Iversen; Rachel T Palmieri; Richard Houlston; Anne M van Altena; Katja K H Aben; Leon F A G Massuger; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Linda E Kelemen; Nhu D Le; Anna Jakubowska; Jan Lubinski; Krzysztof Medrek; Anne Stafford; Douglas F Easton; Jonathan Tyrer; Kelly L Bolton; Patricia Harrington; Diana Eccles; Ann Chen; Ashley N Molina; Barbara N Davila; Hector Arango; Ya-Yu Tsai; Zhihua Chen; Harvey A Risch; John McLaughlin; Steven A Narod; Argyrios Ziogas; Wendy Brewster; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Usha Menon; Anna H Wu; Daniel O Stram; Malcolm C Pike; Jonathan Beesley; Penelope M Webb; Xiaoqing Chen; Arif B Ekici; Falk C Thiel; Matthias W Beckmann; Hannah Yang; Nicolas Wentzensen; Jolanta Lissowska; Peter A Fasching; Evelyn Despierre; Frederic Amant; Ignace Vergote; Jennifer Doherty; Rebecca Hein; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Galina Lurie; Michael E Carney; Pamela J Thompson; Ingo Runnebaum; Peter Hillemanns; Matthias Dürst; Natalia Antonenkova; Natalia Bogdanova; Arto Leminen; Ralf Butzow; Tuomas Heikkinen; Kari Stefansson; Patrick Sulem; Sören Besenbacher; Thomas A Sellers; Simon A Gayther; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Variation at 8q24 and 9p24 and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kristin L White; Thomas A Sellers; Brooke L Fridley; Robert A Vierkant; Catherine M Phelan; Ya-Yu Tsai; Kimberly R Kalli; Andrew Berchuck; Edwin S Iversen; Lynn C Hartmann; Mark Liebow; Sebastian Armasu; Zachary Fredericksen; Melissa C Larson; David Duggan; Fergus J Couch; Joellen M Schildkraut; Julie M Cunningham; Ellen L Goode
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.587

5.  Targeted disruption of Nemo-like kinase inhibits tumor cell growth by simultaneous suppression of cyclin D1 and CDK2 in human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kwang Hwa Jung; Jeong Kyu Kim; Ji Heon Noh; Jung Woo Eun; Hyun Jin Bae; Hong Jian Xie; Young Min Ahn; Won Sang Park; Jung Young Lee; Suk Woo Nam
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  Whole chromosome instability caused by Bub1 insufficiency drives tumorigenesis through tumor suppressor gene loss of heterozygosity.

Authors:  Darren J Baker; Fang Jin; Karthik B Jeganathan; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  Nemo-like kinase induces apoptosis and inhibits androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Katayoon H Emami; Lisha G Brown; Tiffany E M Pitts; Xizhang Sun; Robert L Vessella; Eva Corey
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 8.  Role of genetic polymorphisms and ovarian cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Peter A Fasching; Simon Gayther; Leigh Pearce; Joellen M Schildkraut; Ellen Goode; Falk Thiel; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Jenny Chang-Claude; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Susan Ramus; Paul Pharoah; Andrew Berchuck
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  Aurora kinases as prognostic biomarkers in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Marta Mendiola; Jorge Barriuso; Adrián Mariño-Enríquez; Andrés Redondo; Aurora Domínguez-Cáceres; Ginés Hernández-Cortés; Elia Pérez-Fernández; Iker Sánchez-Navarro; Juan Angel Fresno Vara; Asunción Suárez; Enrique Espinosa; Manuel González-Barón; José Palacios; David Hardisson
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  MicroRNA processing and binding site polymorphisms are not replicated in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.

Authors:  Jennifer Permuth-Wey; Zhihua Chen; Ya-Yu Tsai; Hui-Yi Lin; Y Ann Chen; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Michael J Birrer; Stephen J Chanock; Daniel W Cramer; Julie M Cunningham; David Fenstermacher; Brooke L Fridley; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Simon A Gayther; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet; Edwin Iversen; Heather Jim; John McLaughlin; Usha Menon; Steven A Narod; Catherine M Phelan; Susan J Ramus; Harvey Risch; Honglin Song; Rebecca Sutphen; Kathryn L Terry; Jonathan Tyrer; Robert A Vierkant; Nicolas Wentzensen; Johnathan M Lancaster; Jin Q Cheng; Andrew Berchuck; Paul D P Pharoah; Joellen M Schildkraut; Ellen L Goode; Thomas A Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  4 in total

1.  Upregulation of nemo-like kinase is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Jian He; Yan Du; Xian-Hua Gao; Yan Liu; Qi-Zhi Liu; Wen-Jun Chang; Guang-Wen Cao; Chuan-Gang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Lentivirus-based RNA silencing of Nemo-like kinase (NLK) inhibits the CAL 27 human adenosquamos carcinoma cells proliferation and blocks G0/G1 phase to S phase.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Ke Yi Li; Hai Ying Chen; Shao Dong Pan; Shuang Feng Chen; Wei Feng Zhang; Chun Peng Xia; Li Cheng Jiang; Xian Bin Liu; Feng Jun Zhao; Dao Ying Yuan; Le Xin Wang; Ya Ping Wu; Shu Wei Liu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Expression of Nemo-like kinase in cervical squamous cell carcinoma: a clinicopathological study.

Authors:  Weina Yang; Lina Gu; Chang Yang; Tianbo Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  NLK interacts with 14‑3‑3ζ to restore the expression of E‑cadherin.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Qingfeng Lin; Tingting Ni; Jiyi Zhao; Feng Lin; Xiangdong Lu; Ye Lv; Shujuan Ren; Zhili Liu; Ting Zhang; Shuyan He; Dong Shen; Weidong Mao
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.906

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.