Literature DB >> 22251553

Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-assisted implant placement. Part I: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability.

Volkan Arisan1, Zihni Cüneyt Karabuda, Hakan Avsever, Tayfun Özdemir.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The relationship of conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT)- and cone beam CT (CBCT)-based gray density values and the primary stability parameters of implants that were placed by stereolithographic surgical guides were analyzed in this study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen edentulous jaws were randomly scanned by a CT (CT group) or a CBCT scanner (CBCT group) and radiographic gray density was measured from the planned implants. A total of 108 implants were placed, and primary stability parameters were measured by insertion torque value (ITV) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Radiographic and subjective bone quality classification (BQC) was also classified. Results were analyzed by correlation tests and multiple regressions (p < .05).
RESULTS: CBCT-based gray density values (765 ± 97.32 voxel value) outside the implants were significantly higher than those of CT-based values (668.4 ± 110 Hounsfield unit, p < .001). Significant relations were found among the gray density values outside the implants, ITV (adjusted r(2)  = 0.6142, p = .001 and adjusted r(2)  = 0.5166, p = .0021), and RFA (adjusted r(2)  = 0.5642, p = .0017 and adjusted r(2)  = 0.5423, p = .0031 for CT and CBCT groups, respectively). Data from radiographic and subjective BQC were also in agreement.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar to the gray density values of CT, that of CBCT could also be predictive for the subjective BQC and primary implant stability. Results should be confirmed on different CBCT scanners.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  computed tomography; cone beam; dental implants; gray density; implant stability; stereolithography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22251553     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00436.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  19 in total

1.  CT dataset anisotropy management for oral implantology planning software.

Authors:  Tommaso Chiarelli; Evelina Lamma; Tommaso Sansoni
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Guldane Magat; Sevgi Ozcan Sener
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Clinical, radiographical, and histological outcomes of plasma rich in growth factors in extraction socket: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Eduardo Anitua; Alia Murias-Freijo; Mohammad Hamdan Alkhraisat; Gorka Orive
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Can gray values be converted to Hounsfield units? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marjorie Eguren; Anderson Holguin; Karla Diaz; Jose Vidalon; Carlos Linan; Camila Pacheco-Pereira; Manuel Oscar Lagravere Vich
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Osteoporosis prediction from the mandible using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Imad Barngkgei; Iyad Al Haffar; Razan Khattab
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-11-25

6.  Location of the mandibular canal and thickness of the occlusal cortical bone at dental implant sites in the lower second premolar and first molar.

Authors:  Jui-Ting Hsu; Heng-Li Huang; Lih-Jyh Fuh; Rou-Wei Li; Jay Wu; Ming-Tzu Tsai; Yen-Wen Shen; Ming-Gene Tu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-11-03       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  An ex vivo model in human femoral heads for histopathological study and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant primary stability.

Authors:  Pedro Hernández-Cortés; Alberto Monje; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Andrés Catena; Inmaculada Ortega-Oller; José Salas-Pérez; Francisco Mesa; Rafael Gómez-Sánchez; Mariano Aguilar; David Aguilar; Francisco O'Valle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Relationship between Hounsfield Unit in CT Scan and Gray Scale in CBCT.

Authors:  Tahmineh Razi; Mahdi Niknami; Fakhri Alavi Ghazani
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2014-06-11

9.  A comparison of micro-CT and dental CT in assessing cortical bone morphology and trabecular bone microarchitecture.

Authors:  Jui-Ting Hsu; Ying-Ju Chen; Jung-Ting Ho; Heng-Li Huang; Shun-Ping Wang; Fu-Chou Cheng; Jay Wu; Ming-Tzu Tsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cone-beam computed tomography artifacts in the presence of dental implants and associated factors: an integrative review.

Authors:  Bianca Rodrigues Terrabuio; Caroline Gomes Carvalho; Mariela Peralta-Mamani; Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen; Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.