Literature DB >> 22250970

Group service in macaques (Macaca fuscata), capuchins (Cebus apella) and marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): a comparative approach to identifying proactive prosocial motivations.

Judith Maria Burkart1, Carel van Schaik.   

Abstract

Proactive, that is, spontaneous, prosociality reflects a psychological interest in the welfare of others and has been reported in callitrichid monkeys, capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), and humans, but not in chimpanzees. One explanation for the co-occurrence of proactive prosociality in these species is that it is linked to shared infant care (cooperative breeding); alternatively, it might merely reflect unusually high social tolerance or be mediated by advanced cognitive abilities. To date, distinguishing between these alternative explanations is difficult, partly because available evidence is restricted to only a handful of species and partly because methodological differences thwart comparisons across studies. Here, we present an experimental paradigm called group service, which allows estimation of both social tolerance and proactive prosociality in group settings. Its simplicity makes it intuitively plausible to subjects and allows testing a broad variety of species, including in zoos. We applied the test to independently breeding Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata), cooperatively breeding common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), and capuchin monkeys with an intermediate breeding system. Social tolerance was slightly higher in marmosets than capuchins and much higher in both compared to macaques, but only marmosets provided a service to other group members. Furthermore, we validated the group service paradigm in the common marmosets by comparing their performance to earlier data. Although our results are consistent with the cooperative breeding hypothesis, a comprehensive evaluation requires adding data from additional groups and species, which should be facilitated by the group service approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250970     DOI: 10.1037/a0026392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  21 in total

1.  Lack of prosociality in great apes, capuchin monkeys and spider monkeys: convergent evidence from two different food distribution tasks.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Elisabetta Visalberghi; Josep Call
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The evolution of altruistic social preferences in human groups.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Bailey R House
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Opposite effects of male and female helpers on social tolerance and proactive prosociality in callitrichid family groups.

Authors:  Judith M Burkart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition in crested macaques (Macaca nigra).

Authors:  Jérôme Micheletta; Jamie Whitehouse; Lisa A Parr; Paul Marshman; Antje Engelhardt; Bridget M Waller
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Proactive prosociality in a cooperatively breeding corvid, the azure-winged magpie (Cyanopica cyana).

Authors:  Lisa Horn; Clara Scheer; Thomas Bugnyar; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  The nature of prosociality in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Claudio Tennie; Keith Jensen; Josep Call
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Carrion Crows and Azure-Winged Magpies Show No Prosocial Tendencies When Tested in a Token Transfer Paradigm.

Authors:  Lisa Horn; Jeroen S Zewald; Thomas Bugnyar; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Can vocal conditioning trigger a semiotic ratchet in marmosets?

Authors:  Hjalmar K Turesson; Sidarta Ribeiro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-07

9.  Preschool children fail primate prosocial game because of attentional task demands.

Authors:  Judith Maria Burkart; Katja Rueth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Critical issues in experimental studies of prosociality in non-human species.

Authors:  S Marshall-Pescini; R Dale; M Quervel-Chaumette; F Range
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.