Literature DB >> 22250728

Tracking earthworm communities from soil DNA.

Friederike Bienert1, Sébastien De Danieli, Christian Miquel, Eric Coissac, Carole Poillot, Jean-Jacques Brun, Pierre Taberlet.   

Abstract

Earthworms are known for their important role within the functioning of an ecosystem, and their diversity can be used as an indicator of ecosystem health. To date, earthworm diversity has been investigated through conventional extraction methods such as handsorting, soil washing or the application of a mustard solution. Such techniques are time consuming and often difficult to apply. We showed that combining DNA metabarcoding and next-generation sequencing facilitates the identification of earthworm species from soil samples. The first step of our experiments was to create a reference database of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) 16S gene for 14 earthworm species found in the French Alps. Using this database, we designed two new primer pairs targeting very short and informative DNA sequences (about 30 and 70 bp) that allow unambiguous species identification. Finally, we analysed extracellular DNA taken from soil samples in two localities (two plots per locality and eight samples per plot). The two short metabarcode regions led to the identification of a total of eight earthworm species. The earthworm communities identified by the DNA-based approach appeared to be well differentiated between the two localities and are consistent with results derived from inventories collected using the handsorting method. The possibility of assessing earthworm communities from hundreds or even thousands of localities through the use of extracellular soil DNA will undoubtedly stimulate further ecological research on these organisms. Using the same DNA extracts, our study also illustrates the potential of environmental DNA as a tool to assess the diversity of other soil-dwelling animal taxa.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250728     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  16 in total

1.  A bloody boon for conservation.

Authors:  Ewen Callaway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The changing epitome of species identification - DNA barcoding.

Authors:  M Ajmal Ali; Gábor Gyulai; Norbert Hidvégi; Balázs Kerti; Fahad M A Al Hemaid; Arun K Pandey; Joongku Lee
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Metabarcoding Malaise traps and soil eDNA reveals seasonal and local arthropod diversity shifts.

Authors:  Ameli Kirse; Sarah J Bourlat; Kathrin Langen; Vera G Fonseca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Persistence of DNA in carcasses, slime and avian feces may affect interpretation of environmental DNA data.

Authors:  Christopher M Merkes; S Grace McCalla; Nathan R Jensen; Mark P Gaikowski; Jon J Amberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A new way to contemplate Darwin's tangled bank: how DNA barcodes are reconnecting biodiversity science and biomonitoring.

Authors:  Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Donald J Baird; Nicole A Fahner; Robert Beiko; G Brian Golding
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Inferring neutral biodiversity parameters using environmental DNA data sets.

Authors:  Guilhem Sommeria-Klein; Lucie Zinger; Pierre Taberlet; Eric Coissac; Jérôme Chave
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Environmental DNA detection of an invasive ant species (Linepithema humile) from soil samples.

Authors:  Tetsu Yasashimoto; Masayuki K Sakata; Tomoya Sakita; Satoko Nakajima; Mamiko Ozaki; Toshifumi Minamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment.

Authors:  Alexei J Drummond; Richard D Newcomb; Thomas R Buckley; Dong Xie; Andrew Dopheide; Benjamin Cm Potter; Joseph Heled; Howard A Ross; Leah Tooman; Stefanie Grosser; Duckchul Park; Nicholas J Demetras; Mark I Stevens; James C Russell; Sandra H Anderson; Anna Carter; Nicola Nelson
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  The utility of DNA metabarcoding for studying the response of arthropod diversity and composition to land-use change in the tropics.

Authors:  Kingsly Chuo Beng; Kyle W Tomlinson; Xian Hui Shen; Yann Surget-Groba; Alice C Hughes; Richard T Corlett; J W Ferry Slik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Filling reference gaps via assembling DNA barcodes using high-throughput sequencing-moving toward barcoding the world.

Authors:  Shanlin Liu; Chentao Yang; Chengran Zhou; Xin Zhou
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.