Literature DB >> 22250145

Wheeled mobility (wheelchair) service delivery: scope of the evidence.

Nancy Greer1, Michelle Brasure, Timothy J Wilt.   

Abstract

Identifying the appropriate wheelchair for a person who needs one has implications for both disabled persons and society. For someone with severe locomotive problems, the right wheelchair can affect mobility and quality of life. However, policymakers are concerned about the increasing demand for unnecessarily elaborate chairs. The Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, issued 4 reports between 2009 and 2011 detailing fraud and misapplication of Medicare funds for powered wheelchairs, more than a decade after similar concerns were first raised by 4 contractors who process claims for durable medical equipment. Subsequent concerns have arisen about whether some impaired persons who need wheeled mobility devices may now be inappropriately denied coverage. A transparent, evidence-based approach to wheeled mobility service delivery (the matching of mobility-impaired persons to appropriate devices and supporting services) might lessen these concerns. This review describes the process of wheeled mobility service delivery for long-term wheelchair users with complex rehabilitation needs and presents findings from a survey of the literature (published and gray) and interviews with key informants. Recommended steps in the delivery process were identified in textbooks, guidelines, and published literature. Delivery processes shared many commonalities; however, no research supports the recommended approaches. A search of bibliographic databases through March 2011 identified 24 studies that evaluated aspects of wheeled mobility service delivery. Most were observational, exploratory studies designed to determine consumer use of and satisfaction with the process. The evidence base for the effectiveness of approaches to wheeled mobility service delivery is insufficient, and additional research is needed to develop standards and guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250145     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-2-201201170-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  15 in total

1.  Understanding the Provision of Assistive Mobility and Daily Living Devices and Service Delivery to Veterans After Stroke.

Authors:  John A Kairalla; Sandra L Winkler; Hua Feng
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

2.  Power mobility with collision avoidance for older adults: user, caregiver, and prescriber perspectives.

Authors:  Rosalie H Wang; Alexandra Korotchenko; Laura Hurd Clarke; W Ben Mortenson; Alex Mihailidis
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

Review 3.  What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products.

Authors:  Isomi M Miake-Lye; Susanne Hempel; Roberta Shanman; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-10

4.  Rare diseases: matching wheelchair users with rare metabolic, neuromuscular or neurological disorders to electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs).

Authors:  Lorraine H De Souza; Andrew O Frank
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  Manual Wheelchair Skills Training for Community-Dwelling Veterans with Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  R Lee Kirby; Doug Mitchell; Sunil Sabharwal; Mark McCranie; Audrey L Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test as a measure of the mobility of wheelchair users.

Authors:  Karen L Rispin; Kara Huff; Joy Wee
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2017-09-08

7.  A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision.

Authors:  Deepan C Kamaraj; Nathan Bray; Karen Rispin; Padmaja Kankipati; Jonathan Pearlman; Johan Borg
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2017-09-08

Review 8.  Evidence-based mapping of design heterogeneity prior to meta-analysis: a systematic review and evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Michelle D Althuis; Douglas L Weed; Cara L Frankenfeld
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-23

9.  Wheelchair services and use outcomes: A cross-sectional survey in Kenya and the Philippines.

Authors:  Eva S Bazant; Elizabeth J Himelfarb Hurwitz; Brenda N Onguti; Emma K Williams; Jamie H Noon; Cheryl A Xavier; Ferdiliza D S Garcia; Anthony Gichangi; Mohammed Gabbow; Peter Musakhi; R Lee Kirby
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2017-10-20

10.  Development of a Hybrid Course on Wheelchair Service Provision for clinicians in international contexts.

Authors:  Yohali Burrola-Mendez; Mary Goldberg; Rachel Gartz; Jon Pearlman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.