Literature DB >> 22249832

Open and closed cavity mastoid operations: comparing early hearing results.

T Galm1, T P C Martin, V Raut.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to compare audiological results in patients treated surgically with either an open or closed cavity mastoidectomy. A prospective review of a single surgeon's case series based at two district general hospitals. All patients with 1-year post-operative hearing results following an open or closed cavity mastoid surgery were included. Outcome measured included the preoperative and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG). Belfast rule of thumb was used to assess the benefit from middle ear surgery. A total of 128 patients were identified from the database with 1 year post-operative hearing results. Sixty-three patients had undergone an open cavity mastoidectomy and 65 had a closed cavity mastoidectomy. The mean post-operative ABG in patients with open cavity mastoidectomy was 24 dB and for closed cavity 21 dB (p = 0.12). There was no statistical difference between open and closed cavity mastoidectomy with or without ossiculoplasty and if the underlying pathology was squamous or mucosal disease. However, patient with post-operative ABG below or equal to 20 dB was 41% for closed cavity compared to 21% for open cavity. Using the Belfast rule of thumb, 79% of the patients in both groups had successful hearing results post surgery. The 1-year post-operative audiological results between open and closed cavity masoidectomy showed no statistical difference. The pathology affecting the middle ear also had no influence on the hearing results between the two groups. However, there was a higher percentage of patients with closed cavity procedures who had a post-operative ABG that was below or equal to 20 dB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22249832     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1914-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  11 in total

1.  Ten-year results of canal wall down mastoidectomy for acquired cholesteatoma.

Authors:  E Vartiainen
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.863

2.  Middle ear cholesteatoma: non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging--value in detection.

Authors:  Bert De Foer; Jean-Philippe Vercruysse; Anja Bernaerts; Joke Meersschaert; Christoph Kenis; Marc Pouillon; Luc De Beuckeleer; Johan Michiels; Kris Bogaerts; Filip Deckers; Thomas Somers; Robert Hermans; Erwin Offeciers; Jan W Casselman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A multivariate analysis of the factors predicting hearing outcome after surgery for cholesteatoma in children.

Authors:  N K Chadha; A Jardine; D Owens; S Gillett; P J Robinson; A R Maw
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  Diffusion-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma evaluation.

Authors:  Kara M Schwartz; John I Lane; Brian A Neff; Bradley D Bolster; Colin L Driscoll; Charles W Beatty
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.697

5.  Ceravital reconstruction of canal wall down mastoidectomy: long-term results.

Authors:  Charles C Della Santina; Su Cherl Lee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-06

6.  Anatomic and functional long-term results of canal wall-down mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Maria Izabel Kos; Rodrigo Castrillon; Pierre Montandon; Jean-Philippe Guyot
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Pediatric cholesteatoma: canal wall window alternative to canal wall down mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Ricardo A Godinho; Syed H Kamil; Jose N Lubianca; Ivan J Keogh; Roland D Eavey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Audiologic results of surgery for cholesteatoma: short- and long-term follow-up of influential factors.

Authors:  Milan D Stankovic
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Postoperative aeration in the middle ear and hearing outcome after canal wall down tympanoplasty with soft-wall reconstruction for cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Haginomori; Atsuko Takamaki; Ryuzaburo Nonaka; Akihito Mineharu; Atsuko Kanazawa; Hiroshi Takenaka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Canal wall down mastoidectomy: A long term commitment to the outpatients?

Authors:  Hisham S Khalil; Paul C Windle-Taylor
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2003-09-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Computed Tomography Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Mohamed Rashad Ghonim; Bassem Ashraf
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-25

2.  Results of Active Middle Ear Implantation in Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss After Middle Ear Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study (the ROMEO Study).

Authors:  Chan Il Song; Hyong-Ho Cho; Byung Yoon Choi; Jae Young Choi; Jin Woong Choi; Yun-Hoon Choung; Jong Woo Chung; Won-Ho Chung; Sung Hwa Hong; Yehree Kim; Byung Don Lee; Il-Woo Lee; Jong Dae Lee; Jun Ho Lee; Kyu-Yup Lee; Il Joon Moon; In Seok Moon; Seung-Ha Oh; Hong Ju Park; Shi Nae Park; Ji Won Seo
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.372

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.