| Literature DB >> 22249720 |
Wouter Kuit1, Nigel P Minton, Ana M López-Contreras, Gerrit Eggink.
Abstract
In microorganisms, the enzyme acetate kinase (AK) catalyses the formation of ATP from ADP by de-phosphorylation of acetyl phosphate into acetic acid. A mutant strain of Clostridium acetobutylicum lacking acetate kinase activity is expected to have reduced acetate and acetone production compared to the wild type. In this work, a C. acetobutylicum mutant strain with a selectively disrupted ack gene, encoding AK, was constructed and genetically and physiologically characterized. The ack (-) strain showed a reduction in acetate kinase activity of more than 97% compared to the wild type. The fermentation profiles of the ack (-) and wild-type strain were compared using two different fermentation media, CGM and CM1. The latter contains acetate and has a higher iron and magnesium content than CGM. In general, fermentations by the mutant strain showed a clear shift in the timing of peak acetate production relative to butyrate and had increased acid uptake after the onset of solvent formation. Specifically, in acetate containing CM1 medium, acetate production was reduced by more than 80% compared to the wild type under the same conditions, but both strains produced similar final amounts of solvents. Fermentations in CGM showed similar peak acetate and butyrate levels, but increased acetoin (60%), ethanol (63%) and butanol (16%) production and reduced lactate (-50%) formation by the mutant compared to the wild type. These findings are in agreement with the proposed regulatory function of butyryl phosphate as opposed to acetyl phosphate in the metabolic switch of solventogenic clostridia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22249720 PMCID: PMC3315644 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3848-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0175-7598 Impact factor: 4.813
Strains and plasmids
| Strains | Relevant characteristics | Remarks | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Cloning strain | Invitrogen | |
|
| Methylation strain | This study | |
|
| Originally obtained as ATCC 824 but shown to deviate from type strain behaviour (Siemerink et al. | Laboratory stock | |
|
|
| Acetate kinase knockout mutant of WUR strain | This study |
| Plasmids | |||
| pAN2 | p15A ori; TcR Φ3t I Met | Methylation plasmid derived from pAN1 but with tetracycline resistance selection | Laboratory stock (Heap et al. |
| pMTL007::Cac- | ColE1 ori, pCB102 ori; CamR LtrA intron II | Supplied pMTL007 backbone and is a positive control targeted to insert in | Laboratory stock (Heap et al. |
| pMTL007::Cac-ack-1027a | ColE1 ori, pCB102 ori; CamR LtrA intron II | Targeted to insert in | This study |
| pMTL007::Cac-ack-84s | ColE1 ori, pCB102 ori; CamR LtrA intron II | Targeted to insert in | This study |
ermB confers resistance to erythromycin, p15A ori E. coli origin of replication, Tc tetracycline resistance, Φ3t I Met Bacillus subtilis phage Φ3t I methyltransferase gene, ColE1 ori E. coli origin of replication, pCB102 ori clostridial origin of replication, Cam chloramphenicol resistance, LtrA the intron-encoded protein of the Lactococcus lactis Ll.LtrB group II intron
Primer sequences
| Primer name | Sequence (5′ → 3′)a |
|---|---|
| AK1027a_ibs | aaaa |
| AK1027a_ebs1d | cagat |
| AK1027a_ebs2 | tgaacgcaag tttctaattt cgGttAAACA Tcgatagagg aaagtgtct |
| AK84s_ibs | aaaa |
| AK84s_ebs1d | cagat |
| AK84s_ebs2 | tgaacgcaag tttctaattt cgAttAGTAC Tcgatagagg aaagtgtct |
| EBS_Univ | cgaaattaga aacttgcgtt cagtaaac |
| Cac_ack_fwd | atgaaaaact tagttattaa ctgcg |
| Cac_ack_rev | ttattttaac ttgcctacta tatcttt |
| 5402F_fwd | ttaaggaggt gtatttcata tgaccatgat tacg |
| pMTL007_rev | agggtatccc cagttagtgt taagtcttgg |
| ErmRAM-F | acgcgttata ttgataaaaa taataatagt ggg |
| ErmRAM-R | acgcgtgcga ctcatagaat tatttcctcc cg |
| TT_Probe_f | aatctgtagg agaacctatg ggaacg |
| TT_Probe_r | cgcgtcgcca cgtaataaat atctgg |
aNucleotides that are not complementary to the template sequence are given in uppercase. HindIII and BsrGI restriction sites incorporated in the primers are underlined
Specific enzyme activities involved in production of acetate and butyrate in wild-type and AK mutant homogenates
| Growth mediuma | Strain | Specific activities (U mg−1)b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetate pathway | Butyrate pathway | ||||
| PTA | AK | PTB | BK | ||
| CM1 | WT | 0.40 ± 0.05 | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 9.18 ± 0.02 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| AK | 0.24 ± 0.01 (59%) | 0.08 ± 0.02 (2.7%) | 8.3 ± 0.5 (90%) | 1.0 ± 0.3 (72%) | |
| CGM | WT | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 7.4 ± 1.3 | 1.2 ± 0.1 |
| AK | 0.212 ± 0.007 (71%) | 0.064 ± 0.004 (1.9%) | 7.5 ± 0.1 (100%) | 0.66 ± 0.05 (53%) | |
aCells were harvested when OD600 = 1.0
bData are reported as the mean ± SEM (n = 2). In the case of homogenates from the AK mutant, the relative activity compared to that of the wild type is given in parentheses.
End-point product concentrations and fermentation parameters of 1 L batch fermentations (pH 5.0) using CM1 and CGM as cultivation media by the C. acetobutylicum WT strain and the AK mutant strain
| CM1 | CGM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild typed | AKd | Changee (%) | Wild typef | AKf | Changee (%) | |
| Fermentations | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Consumed glucose (mM) | 372 (± 5) | 353 (± 6) | 358 (± 7) | 345 (± 11) | ||
| Final acetate (mM) | 69 (± 7) | 34 (± 4) | 30 (± 5) | 29 (± 4) | ||
| Relative acetatea (mM) | 27 (± 7) | −7 (± 4) | −128 | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Butyrate (mM) | 16 (± 0.4) | 13 (± 1) | 29 (± 3) | 4.3 (± 2) | −85 | |
| Lactate (mM) | 2 (± 0.2) | 3 (± 0.7) | 57 (± 7) | 28 (± 2) | −51 | |
| Butanolb (mM) | 161 (± 2) | 157 (± 7) | 131 (± 1) | 152 (± 2) | +16 | |
| Acetoneb (mM) | 101 (± 3) | 98 (± 7) | 40 (± 6) | 36 (± 5) | ||
| Ethanolb (mM) | 30 (± 1) | 35 (± 4) | 24 (± 2) | 39 (± 2) | +59 | |
| Acetoinc (mM) | 11 (± 1) | 19 (± 5) | 15 (± 0.7) | 24 (± 1) | +58 | |
| Biomass (mg mL−1) | 4.57 (± 0.01) | 6.5 (± 0.4) | 4.5 (± 0.3)g | 5.5 (± 0.1)g | +22 | |
| Carbon recovery (including biomass) | 93% | 98% | 83% | 86% | ||
| (Butanol + ethanol)/acetone (mol/mol) | 1.9 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.5 | ||
| Solvent yield based on | ||||||
| mol butanol/mol glucose | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.37 | 0.44 | ||
| g ABE/g glucose | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.24 | +20 | |
aRelative acetate is calculated by the subtracting the initial acetate level at time of inoculation from the measured acetate levels later during the fermentation
bDue to evaporation, ethanol and acetone levels dropped at the end of the fermentation. Peak recorded values were used
cBoth the wild-type and the AK mutant strain also produced low levels (2–4 mM) of meso-2,3-butanediol as previously described (Siemerink et al. 2011)
dData as mean (± SEM) based on two independent experiments
eIf significant (t test, >95% confidence), then the relative change in product levels is given
fData as mean (± SEM) based on three independent experiments
gData based on two independent experiments
Fig. 1Typical optical density and production profile of a wild-type (a and b) and AK mutant strain (c and d) fermentation in pH 5.0 controlled batch reactors using CM1 medium containing 100 g L−1 glucose. a, c Production of acids acetate, butyrate, lactate, solid line pH, , OD600. b, d production of solvents ethanol, butanol, acetone, acetoin, OD600
Fig. 2Typical optical density and production profile of a wild-type (a and b) and AK mutant strain (c and d) fermentation in pH 5.0 controlled batch reactors using CGM containing 80 g L−1 glucose. a, c Production of acids acetate, butyrate, lactate, solid line pH, OD600. b, d Production of solvents ethanol, butanol, acetone, acetoin, OD600
Fig. 3Butyrate–acetate ratios in CGM (a) or butyrate-relative acetate ratios CM1 (b) of a wild-type strain () and AK mutant strain () fermentation in pH 5.0 controlled batch reactors. On the horizontal axis, normalized time is plotted to account for variations in lag time of the cultures. In the graph, 9 h corresponds to an OD600 of 1.0. Relative acetate is calculated by the subtracting the initial acetate level at time of inoculation from the measured acetate levels later during the fermentation