| Literature DB >> 22249410 |
Janaína V dos Anjos1, Rajendra M Srivastava, João H Costa-Silva, Luciana Scotti, Marcus T Scotti, Almir G Wanderley, Elisa Soares Leite, Sebastião J de Melo, Francisco J B Mendonça Junior.
Abstract
In this study, the antinociceptive properties of 3,4-dihydro-2,6-diaryl-4-oxo-pyrimidine-5-carbonitrile derivatives 5a-i at doses of 25 and 50 mg/kg were evaluated in mice, using the abdominal constriction test. Molecular modeling studies were also performed using density functional theory calculations. These data provided information about the electrostatic and ionization potentials and were used to compare the antinociceptive activity of the title compounds. The most active compounds were 3,4-dihydro-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxo-pyrimidine-5-carbonitrile (5b) and 3,4-dihydro-2,6-diphenyl-4-oxo-pyrimidine-5-carbonitrile (5i), which inhibited the number of abdominal constrictions, at 50 mg/kg dose, in 88.6% and 88% of the sample, respectively. A preliminary SAR study demonstrated that halogen replacement in the phenyl rings of the compounds under study reduces the antinociceptive activity. DFT calculations showed that there is a high correlation between the ionization potentials and the analgesic properties of the compounds. It was found that compounds with a positive ionization potential (compounds 5b and 5i) were found to be the best analgesic drugs in this series.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22249410 PMCID: PMC6268915 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17010809
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Pyrimidinone derivatives as anti-inflammatory drugs.
Antinociceptive activity of 5a–i and indomethacin in the acetic acid writhing test. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD for the dose-response profile of six animals.
| Compd. | Dose (mg/kg) | Antinociceptive activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | - | |
| 50 | 71.5 ± 6.9 | |
| 25 | 49.5 ± 9.9 | |
| 50 | 88.6 ± 3.4 | |
| 25 | - | |
| 50 | 75.1 ± 5.8 | |
| 25 | 68.8 ± 8.2 | |
| 50 | 86.0 ± 4.1 | |
| 25 | 56.4 ± 11.9 | |
| 50 | 73.9 ± 10.0 | |
| 25 | 22.1 ± 16.1 | |
| 50 | 71.4 ± 8.5 | |
| 25 | 57.7 ± 9.9 | |
| 50 | 70.0 ± 5.4 | |
| 25 | 47.4 ± 13.0 | |
| 50 | 61.0 ± 13.7 | |
| 25 | 85.4 ± 4.6 | |
| 50 | 88.0 ± 4.0 | |
| 10 | 76.3 ± 4.8 |
Figure 2Comparative local ionization potentials of compounds 5a–i and indomethacin.
Scheme 1Synthesis of compounds 5a–i.