Anne M Suskind1, Phillip P Smith. 1. Division of Urology, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030, USA. suskina@gmail.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of transient catheterization on uroflow parameters. METHODS: Consenting women (ages 18-90) provided an uninstrumented uroflow pre- and post-indicated in urodynamic procedures. Voided volume, Qmax, and Qave were recorded for both uninstrumented uroflows. Uroflow curves were classified as "normal" or "abnormal." Pre- and post-urodynamic uroflow data were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the study. There was a statistically significant decrease in Qave from the pre- to the post-urodynamic uroflows from 14.71 to 10.55 ml/s (p = 0.012). Additionally, 28.6% of uroflow tracing patterns changed from "normal" to "abnormal," whereas only one (2.9%) changed from "abnormal" to "normal" (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a degradative effect of transient catheterization on uroflow parameters, suggesting that catheterization may cause more than simply a passive obstructive effect. Urethral stimulation due to catheterization may perturb detrusor urethral function, altering voiding and possibly filling performance.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of transient catheterization on uroflow parameters. METHODS: Consenting women (ages 18-90) provided an uninstrumented uroflow pre- and post-indicated in urodynamic procedures. Voided volume, Qmax, and Qave were recorded for both uninstrumented uroflows. Uroflow curves were classified as "normal" or "abnormal." Pre- and post-urodynamic uroflow data were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the study. There was a statistically significant decrease in Qave from the pre- to the post-urodynamic uroflows from 14.71 to 10.55 ml/s (p = 0.012). Additionally, 28.6% of uroflow tracing patterns changed from "normal" to "abnormal," whereas only one (2.9%) changed from "abnormal" to "normal" (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a degradative effect of transient catheterization on uroflow parameters, suggesting that catheterization may cause more than simply a passive obstructive effect. Urethral stimulation due to catheterization may perturb detrusor urethral function, altering voiding and possibly filling performance.
Authors: Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein Journal: Urology Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Cassandra K Kisby; Eric J Gonzalez; Anthony G Visco; Cindy L Amundsen; Warren M Grill Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2019 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.091