Literature DB >> 22248908

Clinical and economic aspects of KRAS mutational status as predictor for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Robert Königsberg1, Wolfgang Hulla, Martin Klimpfinger, Angelika Reiner-Concin, Tanja Steininger, Wilfried Büchler, Robert Terkola, Christian Dittrich.   

Abstract

Treatment of metastasized colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed monoclonal antibodies is driven by the results of the KRAS mutational status (wild type [WT]/mutated [MUT]). To find out as to what extent the treatment selection based on the KRAS status had impact on overall costs, a retrospective analysis was performed. Of 73 mCRC patients 31.5% were MUT carriers. Costs of EGFR inhibitor treatment for WT patients were significantly higher compared to those for patients with MUT (p = 0.005). Higher treatment costs in WT carriers reflect a significantly higher number of treatment cycles (p = 0.012) in this cohort of patients. Savings of drug costs minus the costs for the determination of KRAS status accounted for EUR 779.42 (SD ±336.28) per patient per cycle. The routine use of KRAS screening is a cost-effective strategy. Costs of unnecessary monoclonal EGFR inhibitor treatment can be saved in MUT patients.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22248908     DOI: 10.1159/000334919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cost Considerations in the Evaluation and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Veena Shankaran
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  Overcoming implementation challenges of personalized cancer therapy.

Authors:  Funda Meric-Bernstam; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Economic Value of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Cancer Drugs with Clinically Relevant Drug-Gene Associations: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Fahim Faruque; Heejung Noh; Arif Hussain; Edward Neuberger; Eberechukwu Onukwugha
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2019-02

Review 4.  Panitumumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Importance of Tumour RAS Status.

Authors:  Marc Peeters; Meinolf Karthaus; Fernando Rivera; Jan-Henrik Terwey; Jean-Yves Douillard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Co-expression of HER family members in patients with Dukes' C and D colon cancer and their impacts on patient prognosis and survival.

Authors:  Said Abdullah Khelwatty; Sharadah Essapen; Izhar Bagwan; Margaret Green; Alan Michael Seddon; Helmout Modjtahedi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mps1 is associated with the BRAFV600E mutation and predicts poor outcome in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanyan Zhang; Jinyao Dong; Ruyi Shi; Liguo Feng; Yike Li; Caixia Cheng; Ling Zhang; Bin Song; Yanghui Bi; He Huang; Pengzhou Kong; Jiansheng Guo; Jing Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Treatment Timing does not Impact Survival in Stage 4 Colon Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Braden M Johnson; Tony A Pham; Kate J Young; Leonidas E Bantis; Weijing Sun; Anup Kasi
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2022-08-22

8.  Capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine in maintenance treatment for untreated characterised KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis in Chinese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Jinsong Su; Jiajie Lai; Ruikun Yang; Bo Xu; Ying Zhu; Mingdong Zhao; Chen Yang; Guanzhao Liang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.067

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.