Literature DB >> 26162432

Cost Considerations in the Evaluation and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Veena Shankaran1.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: As the cost of cancer care in the United States continues to climb at an alarming rate, it is critically important for the oncology community to begin embracing interventions that provide value to patients and society. This is particularly important in the field of colorectal cancer, where many new high-priced drugs have emerged over the past several years. While adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX and capecitabine) has been shown to fall within accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness, many interventions in the metastatic setting have not. Bevacizumab in the first- and second-line settings as well as EGFR inhibitors across all lines of therapy have been associated with unfavorable cost-effectiveness ratios in several studies conducted in the United States and other countries. A key strategy in improving the cost-effectiveness of CRC treatment in the advanced setting will therefore be to identify predictive biomarkers (e.g., RAS mutation) for therapeutic response to existing drugs as well as drugs in development so that high-priced therapies can be administered to patients most likely to benefit and avoided in those who would not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26162432     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-015-0354-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  44 in total

Review 1.  Cetuximab for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C Meads; J Round; S Tubeuf; D Moore; M Pennant; S Bayliss
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Limits on Medicare's ability to control rising spending on cancer drugs.

Authors:  Peter B Bach
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Xeloda in Adjuvant Colon Cancer Therapy (X-ACT) trial: overview of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Chris J Twelves
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.481

4.  Cost-effectiveness projections of oxaliplatin and infusional fluorouracil versus irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil in first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Bruce E Hillner; Deborah Schrag; Daniel J Sargent; Charles S Fuchs; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; István Láng; Gunnar Folprecht; Marek P Nowacki; Stefano Cascinu; Igor Shchepotin; Joan Maurel; David Cunningham; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Angela Zubel; Ilhan Celik; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Randomized controlled trial of reduced-dose bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin and irinotecan or infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a North American Intergroup Trial.

Authors:  Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Roscoe F Morton; Charles S Fuchs; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Stephen K Williamson; Brian P Findlay; Henry C Pitot; Steven Alberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study.

Authors:  Leonard B Saltz; Stephen Clarke; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Werner Scheithauer; Arie Figer; Ralph Wong; Sheryl Koski; Mikhail Lichinitser; Tsai-Shen Yang; Fernando Rivera; Felix Couture; Florin Sirzén; Jim Cassidy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A Markov model assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of FOLFOX compared with FOLFIRI for the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  John W Tumeh; Pareen J Shenoy; Susan G Moore; John Kauh; Christopher Flowers
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.339

9.  Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold.

Authors:  Karl Claxton; Steve Martin; Marta Soares; Nigel Rice; Eldon Spackman; Sebastian Hinde; Nancy Devlin; Peter C Smith; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Effect of 3 to 5 years of scheduled CEA and CT follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: the FACS randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  John N Primrose; Rafael Perera; Alastair Gray; Peter Rose; Alice Fuller; Andrea Corkhill; Steve George; David Mant
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Patient-Centered Utility Index for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  J Shannon Swan; Inga T Lennes; Natalie N Stump; Jennifer S Temel; David Wang; Lisa Keller; Karen Donelan
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2018-10-15

2.  Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Colorectal Lesions in China.

Authors:  Ning Cui; Yu Zhao; Honggang Yu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Patient considerations in metastatic colorectal cancer - role of panitumumab.

Authors:  Jane E Rogers
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.