Literature DB >> 22248715

Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies.

Mehdi Hamadani1, S Thomas Kochuparambil, Salman Osman, Aaron Cumpston, Sonia Leadmon, Pamela Bunner, Kathy Watkins, Devi Morrison, Ethan Speir, David Deremer, Vamsi Kota, Anand Jillella, Michael Craig, Farrukh Awan.   

Abstract

Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (ID-CY) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been shown to be more efficacious, albeit more toxic, than low-dose cyclophosphamide (LD-CY) mobilization regimens in patients with multiple myeloma treated with conventional therapies. However, the relative importance of cyclophosphamide dose intensity in peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization after novel induction regimens is not known. Here we report mobilization outcomes of 123 patients who underwent transplantation within 1 year of starting induction chemotherapy with novel agents. We compared consecutive patients undergoing mobilization with ID-CY/G-CSF (3-4 g/m(2)) at one institution (n = 55) with patients receiving LD-CY/G-CSF (1.5 g/m(2)) at a different transplantation center (n = 68). At baseline, the 2 groups were well balanced, except for more frequent previous lenalidomide use in the ID-CY group (P = .04). Compared with LD-CY, ID-CY use was associated with higher median peak PB CD34(+) cell count (35/μL versus 160/μL; P < .001), CD34(+) cell yield on day 1 of collection (2.6 × 10(6)/kg versus 11.7 × 10(6)/kg, P ≤ .001), and total CD34(+) cell yield (7.5 × 10(6)/kg versus 16.6 × 10(6)/kg; P ≤ .001). Six patients in the LD-CY group had mobilization failure, compared with no patients in the ID-CY group. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the LD-CY group (P < .001) were unable to collect ≥5 × 10(6)/kg and ≥10 × 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were significantly faster in the ID-CY group, likely because of higher infused CD34(+) cell doses. In conclusion, compared with LD-CY, ID-CY produced a more robust peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization and significantly reduced the rates of mobilization failure. These data caution against the use of LD-CY-containing mobilization strategies in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing stem cell collection after novel induction regimens.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22248715     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of two dose levels of cyclophosphamide for successful stem cell mobilization in myeloma patients.

Authors:  Nils Winkelmann; Max Desole; Inken Hilgendorf; Thomas Ernst; Herbert G Sayer; Christa Kunert; Lars-Olof Mügge; Andreas Hochhaus; Sebastian Scholl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.

Authors:  A Antar; Z K Otrock; M A Kharfan-Dabaja; H A Ghaddara; N Kreidieh; R Mahfouz; A Bazarbachi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  The Singapore Myeloma Study Group Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sanjay de Mel; Yunxin Chen; Sathish Kumar Gopalakrishnan; Melissa Ooi; Constance Teo; Daryl Tan; Min Li Claire Teo; Allison Cy Tso; Lian King Lee; Chandramouli Nagarajan; Yeow Tee Goh; Wee Joo Chng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma comparison of two consecutive regimens in a limited resources country.

Authors:  N Ben Abdejlil; D Belloumi; M Mâammar; R El Fatimi; L Torjman; A Lakhal; F Jenhani; S Hmida; T Ben Othman; S Ladeb
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Improved progression-free and event-free survival in myeloma patients undergoing PBSCH receiving a cyclophosphamide + G-CSF regimen than G-CSF alone.

Authors:  Akira Tanimura; Risen Hirai; Miki Nakamura; Masataka Takeshita; Shotaro Hagiwara; Akiyoshi Miwa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 6.  Advances in stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Rusudan K Hopman; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 8.250

7.  NSAID treatment with meloxicam enhances peripheral stem cell mobilization in myeloma.

Authors:  B Jeker; U Novak; B Mansouri Taleghani; G M Baerlocher; K Seipel; B U Mueller; M Bigler; D Betticher; J-M Luethi; S Farese; A Ruefer; T Pabst
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Use of Backup Stem Cells for Stem Cell Boost and Second Transplant in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Emily C Liang; Lori S Muffly; Parveen Shiraz; Judith A Shizuru; Laura Johnston; Sally Arai; Matthew J Frank; Wen-Kai Weng; Robert Lowsky; Andrew Rezvani; Everett H Meyer; Robert Negrin; David B Miklos; Surbhi Sidana
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2021-02-25

9.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for autologous transplantation - a literature review.

Authors:  Marco Aurélio Salvino; Jefferson Ruiz
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2015-08-19

10.  Successful autologous stem cell collection with filgrastim and plerixafor after long-term lenalidomide therapy for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rishi Agarwal; Muneer H Abidi
Journal:  Hematol Rep       Date:  2012-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.