Literature DB >> 22248539

What limits the efficiency of double-strand break-dependent stress-induced mutation in Escherichia coli?

Chandan Shee1, Rebecca Ponder, Janet L Gibson, Susan M Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Stress-induced mutation is a collection of molecular mechanisms in bacterial, yeast and human cells that promote mutagenesis specifically when cells are maladapted to their environment, i.e. when they are stressed. Here, we review one molecular mechanism: double-strand break (DSB)-dependent stress-induced mutagenesis described in starving Escherichia coli. In it, the otherwise high-fidelity process of DSB repair by homologous recombination is switched to an error-prone mode under the control of the RpoS general stress response, which licenses the use of error-prone DNA polymerase, DinB, in DSB repair. This mechanism requires DSB repair proteins, RpoS, the SOS response and DinB. This pathway underlies half of spontaneous chromosomal frameshift and base substitution mutations in starving E. coli [Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:13659-13664], yet appeared less efficient in chromosomal than F' plasmid-borne genes. Here, we demonstrate and quantify DSB-dependent stress-induced reversion of a chromosomal lac allele with DSBs supplied by I-SceI double-strand endonuclease. I-SceI-induced reversion of this allele was previously studied in an F'. We compare the efficiencies of mutagenesis in the two locations. When we account for contributions of an F'-borne extra dinB gene, strain background differences, and bypass considerations of rates of spontaneous DNA breakage by providing I-SceI cuts, the chromosome is still ∼100 times less active than F. We suggest that availability of a homologous partner molecule for recombinational break repair may be limiting. That partner could be a duplicated chromosomal segment or sister chromosome.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22248539      PMCID: PMC3697267          DOI: 10.1159/000335354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1464-1801


  73 in total

1.  Hypermutation in derepressed operons of Escherichia coli K12.

Authors:  B E Wright; A Longacre; J M Reimers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand-break repair.

Authors:  J N Strathern; B K Shafer; C B McGill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Adaptive reversion of an episomal frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli requires conjugal functions but not actual conjugation.

Authors:  P L Foster; J M Trimarchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli: a role for conjugation.

Authors:  J P Radicella; P U Park; M S Fox
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-04-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Recombination in adaptive mutation.

Authors:  R S Harris; S Longerich; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Adaptive mutation by deletions in small mononucleotide repeats.

Authors:  S M Rosenberg; S Longerich; P Gee; R S Harris
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The stationary-phase sigma factor sigma S (RpoS) is required for a sustained acid tolerance response in virulent Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  I S Lee; J Lin; H K Hall; B Bearson; J W Foster
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Cairns; P L Foster
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids.

Authors:  D Hanahan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Collapse and repair of replication forks in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Kuzminov
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  10 in total

1.  Selection-Enhanced Mutagenesis of lac Genes Is Due to Their Coamplification with dinB Encoding an Error-Prone DNA Polymerase.

Authors:  Itsugo Yamayoshi; Sophie Maisnier-Patin; John R Roth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Selection and Plasmid Transfer Underlie Adaptive Mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sophie Maisnier-Patin; John R Roth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Selective Inbreeding: Genetic Crosses Drive Apparent Adaptive Mutation in the Cairns-Foster System of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Amanda Nguyen; Sophie Maisnier-Patin; Itsugo Yamayoshi; Eric Kofoid; John R Roth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A CRISPR-Cas9 Assisted Non-Homologous End-Joining Strategy for One-step Engineering of Bacterial Genome.

Authors:  Tianyuan Su; Fapeng Liu; Pengfei Gu; Haiying Jin; Yizhao Chang; Qian Wang; Quanfeng Liang; Qingsheng Qi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  DNA polymerase IV primarily operates outside of DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sarah S Henrikus; Elizabeth A Wood; John P McDonald; Michael M Cox; Roger Woodgate; Myron F Goodman; Antoine M van Oijen; Andrew Robinson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  Hypermutation in single-stranded DNA.

Authors:  Natalie Saini; Dmitry A Gordenin
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-05-18

7.  Single-molecule live-cell imaging reveals RecB-dependent function of DNA polymerase IV in double strand break repair.

Authors:  Sarah S Henrikus; Camille Henry; Amy E McGrath; Slobodan Jergic; John P McDonald; Yvonne Hellmich; Steven T Bruckbauer; Matthew L Ritger; Megan E Cherry; Elizabeth A Wood; Phuong T Pham; Myron F Goodman; Roger Woodgate; Michael M Cox; Antoine M van Oijen; Harshad Ghodke; Andrew Robinson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Two mechanisms produce mutation hotspots at DNA breaks in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Chandan Shee; Janet L Gibson; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Stress-induced mutation via DNA breaks in Escherichia coli: a molecular mechanism with implications for evolution and medicine.

Authors:  Susan M Rosenberg; Chandan Shee; Ryan L Frisch; P J Hastings
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 10.  Antibiotic-Induced Mutagenesis: Under the Microscope.

Authors:  Sarah A Revitt-Mills; Andrew Robinson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.