| Literature DB >> 22248151 |
Mariana-Atena Poiana1, Ersilia Alexa, Constantin Mateescu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, an increased interest in the identification of valuable possibilities for preserving the antioxidant properties of products obtained by thermal processing of fruits rich in bioactive compounds can be noticed. In this regard, an extensive analysis is necessary in terms of thermal processed products behavior in relation to various factors. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect which processing and storage at 20°C has on the antioxidant properties and color quality of low-sugar bilberry jam with different low-methoxyl pectin (LMP) concentrations.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22248151 PMCID: PMC3334710 DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-6-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Chemical characteristics of fresh bilberries used in this study
| Component (Units) | Values |
|---|---|
| Total phenolics (mg gallic acid·100-1 g fresh bilberries) | 683.88 ± 25.52 |
| Total anthocyanins content (mg·100-1 g fresh bilberries) | 238.51 ± 18.73 |
| Antioxidant activity (mM Fe2+·100-1 g fresh bilberries) | 5.53 ± 0.38 |
| L-ascorbic acid (mg·100-1 g fresh bilberries) | 17.09 ± 1.22 |
| Color density | 12.31 ± 0.94 |
| Polymeric color | 0.38 ± 0.025 |
| Percent polymeric color (%) | 3.09 ± 0.27 |
Alterations of total monomeric anthocyanins content in jam as effect of LMP concentration and storage time
| Samples | Total anthocyanins content (mg·100-1 g jam) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| storage time (months) | |||||
| 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
| 1.0% LMP | 30.74 ± 1.86a, A | 27.63 ± 1.54ab, A | 23.56 ± 1.93b, A | 18.45 ± 1.64c, A | 13.04 ± 0.97d, A |
| 0.7% LMP | 30.01 ± 1.80a, A | 24.77 ± 1.86b, A | 21.60 ± 1.65b, A | 16.68 ± 1.22c, A | 10.46 ± 0.91d, B |
| 0.5% LMP | 28.12 ± 1.81a, A | 22.75 ± 1.75b, AB | 19.80 ± 1.61b, A | 15.37 ± 1.13c, A | 9.26 ± 0.75d, BC |
| 0.3% LMP | 26.63 ± 2.06a, A | 20.95 ± 1.50b, AB | 18.25 ± 1.45b, AB | 13.74 ± 1.27c, AB | 7.42 ± 0.58d, C |
Means in a row (a-d across storage time) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05). Means in a column (A-C across LMP concentration) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 1The losses of measured parameters (a - TMA; b - TP; c - L-AsAc; d - FRAP) as a result of jam storage at 20°C relative to the value registered one day after processing.
Changes of jam color as effect of LMP concentration and storage time
| Samples | storage time (months) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
| color density | |||||
| 1.0% LMP | 11.82 ± 0.88a, A | 11.64 ± 0.62a, A | 11.21 ± 0.77a, A | 10.53 ± 0.86a, A | 10.07 ± 0.77a, A |
| 0.7% LMP | 11.68 ± 0.83a, A | 11.28 ± 0.78a, A | 10.92 ± 0.80a, A | 10.24 ± 0.78a, A | 9.81 ± 0.78a, A |
| 0.5% LMP | 11.47 ± 0.64a, A | 11.03 ± 0.68a, A | 10.37 ± 0.62a, A | 9.95 ± 0.70a, A | 9.55 ± 0.82a, A |
| 0.3% LMP | 11.25 ± 0.81a, A | 10.51 ± 0.86a, A | 10.08 ± 0.83a, A | 9.52 ± 0.65a, A | 9.31 ± 0.73a, A |
| 1.0% LMP | 1.18 ± 0.09a, A | 1.27 ± 0.10a, A | 1.46 ± 0.12a, A | 1.79 ± 0.15b, A | 2.23 ± 0.17c, A |
| 0.7% LMP | 1.25 ± 0.10a, A | 1.36 ± 0.12a, A | 1.57 ± 0.11a, A | 2.14 ± 0.16b, A | 2.38 ± 0.15c, A |
| 0.5% LMP | 1.37 ± 0.11a, A | 1.51 ± 0.12a, A | 1.73 ± 0.14a, A | 2.37 ± 0.16b, AB | 2.71 ± 0.18c, AB |
| 0.3% LMP | 1.55 ± 0.13a, B | 1.73 ± 0.14a, B | 1.97 ± 0.12a, B | 2.71 ± 0.20b, B | 3.12 ± 0.24c, B |
| 1.0% LMP | 9.98 ± 0.65a, A | 10.91 ± 0.65a, A | 13.02 ± 0.71b, A | 17.00 ± 0.78c, A | 22.14 ± 1.21d, A |
| 0.7% LMP | 10.70 ± 0.85a, A | 12.07 ± 0.72a, A | 14.38 ± 0.64b, A | 20.90 ± 1.15c, B | 24.26 ± 1.12d, A |
| 0.5% LMP | 11.94 ± 0.87a, A | 13.69 ± 0.70a, B | 16.68 ± 0.78b, B | 23.82 ± 0.98c, C | 28.38 ± 1.33d, B |
| 0.3% LMP | 13.78 ± 1.11a, B | 16.46 ± 0.86a, C | 19.54 ± 0.93b, C | 28.47 ± 1.44c, D | 33.51 ± 1.77d, C |
Means in a row (a-d across storage time) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05). Means in a column (A-C across LMP concentration) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05).
Alterations of total phenolics content in jam as effect of LMP concentration and storage
| Samples | Total phenolics (mg gallic acid·100-1 g jam) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| storage time (months) | |||||
| 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
| 1.0% LMP | 275.41 ± 18.73a, A | 261.83 ± 13.64a, A | 244.80 ± 18.74a, A | 219.33 ± 17.0ab, A | 163.19 ± 11.89b, A |
| 0.7% LMP | 260.11 ± 17.0a, A | 239.71 ± 15.33a, A | 219.32 ± 15.30ab, A | 193.78 ± 15.35b, A | 141.09 ± 8.56c,A |
| 0.5% LMP | 248.22 ± 13.61a, A | 224.43 ± 11.91a, A | 205.71 ± 11.92ab, AB | 176.81 ± 11.91b, AB | 122.43 ± 6.84 c,AB |
| 0.3% LMP | 231.23 ± 18.71a, A | 204.03 ± 17.3a, AB | 181.93 ± 13.61ab, AB | 158.1 ± 11.94b, AB | 98.59 ± 8.51 c,AB |
Means in a row (a-d across storage time) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05). Means in a column (A-C across LMP concentration) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05).
Alterations of L-ascorbic acid content in jam as effect of LMP concentration and storage
| Samples | L-ascorbic acid (mg·100-1 g jam) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| storage time (months) | |||||
| 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
| 1.0% LMP | 5.51 ± 0.35a, A | 5.08 ± 0.22a, A | 4.74 ± 0.31ab, A | 4.20 ± 0.21b, A | 3.27 ± 0.24c,A |
| 0.7% LMP | 5.37 ± 0.25a, A | 4.91 ± 0.30a, A | 4.43 ± 0.36ab, A | 3.79 ± 0.28b, A | 2.85 ± 0.18c,A |
| 0.5% LMP | 5.26 ± 0.35a, A | 4.74 ± 0.26a, A | 4.24 ± 0.37ab, A | 3.53 ± 0.29b, AB | 2.66 ± 0.19c,AB |
| 0.3% LMP | 4.91 ± 0.37a, A | 4.32 ± 0.30a, A | 3.85 ± 0.35ab, A | 3.15 ± 0.21b, AB | 2.30 ± 0.15c,AB |
Means in a row (a-d across storage time) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05). Means in a column (A-C across LMP concentration) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05).
Alterations of antioxidant activity in jam as effect of LMP concentration and storage
| Samples | Antioxidant activity (mM Fe2+·100-1 jam) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| storage time (months) | |||||
| 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
| 1.0% LMP | 2.45 ± 0.18a, A | 2.30 ± 0.14a, A | 2.18 ± 0.16a, A | 1.99 ± 0.13ab, A | 1.64 ± 0.12b, A |
| 0.7% LMP | 2.35 ± 0.17a, A | 2.18 ± 0.16a, A | 2.03 ± 0.15a, A | 1.82 ± 0.09ab, A | 1.46 ± 0.09b, A |
| 0.5% LMP | 2.14 ± 0.17a, A | 1.97 ± 0.14a, A | 1.80 ± 0.13a, A | 1.59 ± 0.15ab, AB | 1.27 ± 0.09b, AB |
| 0.3% LMP | 2.02 ± 0.14a, A | 1.80 ± 0.12a, Ab | 1.62 ± 0.15ab, AB | 1.47 ± 0.09b,B | 1.08 ± 0.10c, B |
Means in a row (a-d across storage time) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05). Means in a column (A-C across LMP concentration) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05).
Correlation coefficients obtained by simple regression model applied for investigated parameters
| Y = A+B • X | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1% LMP | 0.7% LMP | 0.5% LMP | 0.3% LMP | |
| FRAP = f(TP) | 0.99612 | 0.99915 | 0.99905 | 0.99815 |
| FRAP = f(TMA) | 0.98922 | 0.99379 | 0.99546 | 0.99451 |
| FRAP = f(L-AsAc) | 0.99983 | 0.99926 | 0.99937 | 0.99399 |
| TP = f(TMA) | 0.97696 | 0.98871 | 0.99675 | 0.98994 |
| TMA = f(% polymeric color) | -0.9851 | -0,97314 | -0,97411 | -0,9739 |
| FRAP = f(% polymeric color) | -0,99237 | -0,97592 | -0,98511 | -0,96569 |