| Literature DB >> 22248044 |
Erik K Hartmann1, Stefan Boehme, Alexander Bentley, Bastian Duenges, Klaus U Klein, Amelie Elsaesser, James E Baumgardner, Matthias David, Klaus Markstaller.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cyclic alveolar recruitment/derecruitment (R/D) is an important mechanism of ventilator-associated lung injury. In experimental models this process can be measured with high temporal resolution by detection of respiratory-dependent oscillations of the paO2 (ΔpaO2). A previous study showed that end-expiratory collapse can be prevented by an increased respiratory rate in saline-lavaged rabbits. The current study compares the effects of increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) versus an individually titrated respiratory rate (RRind) on intra-tidal amplitude of Δ paO2 and on average paO2 in saline-lavaged pigs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22248044 PMCID: PMC3396238 DOI: 10.1186/cc11147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097
Figure 1Real-time recording of paO. Exemplary real-time data (time resolution: 10 Hz) of RRind (upper graphs) and PEEP (lower graphs) intervention following amplitude-stable paO2 oscillations representing cyclic R/D. A steady-state between recruitment and derecruitment is hardly achieved before the interventions. Correlation to airway pressure (paw) and airflow demonstrates the respiratory-dependent character of Δ paO2.
Ventilatory parameters and blood gas analyses (mean ± SD)
| PEEP group | RRind group | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Baseline ALI | R/D I | Intervention Initial | Intervention | R/D II | Baseline ALI | R/D I | Intervention Initial | Intervention | R/D II |
| Ppeak (mbar) | 25 ± 4 | 40 ± 4 | 40 ± 4 | 40 ± 4 | 40 ± 5 | 20 ± 3 | 38 ± 5 | 37 ± 3 | 38 ± 3 | 45 ± 7 |
| Pendinsp (mbar) | 23 ± 5 | 35 ± 4 | 35 ± 4 | 35 ± 4 | 37 ± 7 | 19 ± 3 | 34 ± 4 | 33 ± 3 | 34 ± 3 | 40 ± 9 |
| Pmean (mbar) | 11 ± 1 | 14 ± 3 | 21 ± 3 | 22 ± 3 | 14 ± 3 | 10 ± 1 | 13 ± 3 | 13 ± 3 | 13 ± 3 | 15 ± 4 |
| RR (min-1) | 28 ± 5 | 6 ± 1 | 6 ± 1 | 6 ± 1 | 6 ± 1 | 27 ± 3 | 6 ± 1 | 15 ± 2 | 17 ± 3 | 6 ± 1 |
| PEEPtotal (mbar) | 5 ± 1 | 0 | 13 ± 1 | 13 ± 2 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 5 ± 1 | 0 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.2 | 0 |
| Vt (ml kg-1) | 10 ± 1 | 35 ± 8 | 24 ± 5 | 24 ± 6 | 41 ± 9 | 10 ± 1 | 36 ± 7 | 32 ± 7 | 28 ± 6 | 40 ± 10 |
| FiO2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Tinsp (s) | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.4 |
| Texp (s) | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 8.1 ± 1.8 | 7.9 ± 1.7 | 7.6 ± 1.2 | 8.2 ± 1.3 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 7.9 ± 1.1 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | 8.3 ± 1.4 |
| ph | 7.3 ± 0.1 | 7.3 ± 0.1 | 7.4 ± 0.1 | 7.5 ± 0.1 | ||||||
| paO2 (mmHg) | 199 ± 69 | 539 ± 72 | 219 ± 85 | 163 ± 71 | ||||||
| paO2-Foxy (mmHg) | 187 ± 48 | 307 ± 90 | 500 ± 86 | 550 ± 96 | 353 ± 131 | 223 ± 58 | 372 ± 111 | 381 ± 131 | 174 ± 62 | 209 ± 139 |
| paCO2 (mmHg) | 62 ± 12 | 57 ± 9 | 55 ± 3 | 32 ± 7 | ||||||
| Hb (mg dl-1) | 8 ± 1 | 9 ± 1 | 9 ± 2 | 9 ± 2 | ||||||
| BE (mmol l-1) | 2 ± 4 | 2 ± 3 | 3 ± 6 | 4 ± 4 | ||||||
| Qs/Qt (%) | 26 ± 6 | 6 ± 5 | 24 ± 5 | 25 ± 6 |
Pmean, mean airway pressure; PEEPtotal, PEEPextrinsic + PEEP intrinsic; Tinsp, inspiration time; Texp, expiration time; paO2-Foxy, paO2 measured by the ultrafast invasive probe. (Foxy-AL 300); Qs/Qt (%), calculated pulmonary shunt fraction. No blood gases were sampled during presence of high respiratory-dependent oscillations of the paO2 due to high fluctuations.
Figure 2Time chart of the Δ paO. Δ paO2 (mmHg) after induction (R/D I), within 30 minutes of intervention and after re-induction (R/D II): no respiratory-dependent Δ paO2 was founded before provocation. A significantly higher Δ paO2 persists following PEEP intervention (padjusted < 0.001 after Bonferroni correction). In four animals of the RRind group no Δ paO2 with an amplitude ≥ 50 mmHg was inducible in R/D II due to fixed atelectasis.
Figure 3Time chart of the average paO. Average paO2 (mmHg) after induction (R/D I), within 30 minutes of intervention and after re-induction (R/D II): a significantly decreased oxygenation develops following RRind intervention while PEEP induces a stable lung recruitment (padjusted < 0.001 after Bonferroni correction).
Figure 4Ventilation/Perfusion distribution after PEEP or RR. MMIMS-MIGET derived after 30 minutes of intervention: maintained lung recruitment in the PEEP group and impaired pulmonary function in the RRind group. Intergroup differences: shunt, low and normal each P ≤ 0.001, high P = 0.012 (Mann-Whitney-U-Tests).
Haemodynamic data and vasopressor support (median (IQR))
| PEEP group | RRind group | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Baseline ALI | R/D I | Intervention Initial | Intervention | R/D II | Baseline ALI | R/D I | Intervention Initial | Intervention | R/D II |
| MAP (mmHg) | 91 (29) | 73 (18) | 61 (24) | 66 (4) | 74 (12)* | 99 (26) | 84 (24) | 78 (34) | 74 (24) | 61 (4)* |
| CO (l min-1) | 3.7 (1.1) | 3.7 (1.1) | 2.9 (0.6) | 3.3 (0.7) | 3.5 (0.8) | 3.1 (1.0) | ||||
| SvO2 (%) | 83 (14) | 78 (8)* | 81 (8) | 66 (12)* | ||||||
| Epinephrine (μg kg-1 min-1) | 0 | 0 | 0.2 (0.1)* | 0.2 (0.1)* | 0.2 (0.1)* | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.1)* | 0 (0.02)* | 0* |
* indicate intergroup difference (P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney-U-Test).