Literature DB >> 22247900

Effect on Glycemic, Blood Pressure, and Lipid Control according to Education Types.

Mi-Ju Choi1, Seung-Hyun Yoo, Kum-Rae Kim, Yoo-Mi Bae, Sun-Hee Ahn, Seong-Shin Kim, Seong-Ah Min, Jin-Sun Choi, Seung-Eun Lee, Yeo-Jin Moon, Eun Jung Rhee, Cheol-Young Park, Won Young Lee, Ki Won Oh, Sung Woo Park, Sun Woo Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes self-management education and reinforcement are important for effective management of the disease. We investigated the effectiveness of interactive small-group education on glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid levels.
METHODS: For this study, 207 type 2 diabetes patients with suboptimal glycemic control (HbA1c levels >6.5%) were enrolled. The conventional education group received an existing education program from April to November in 2006, and the interactive education group received a new small-group education program from December 2006 to July 2007. The two groups were comparatively analyzed for changes in blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin, lipid, and blood pressure at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months and the proportion of patients achieving target goals at 12 months.
RESULTS: After 12 months of follow-up, HbA1c levels in the interactive education group were significantly lower than in the conventional education group (6.7% vs. 6.4%, P<0.001). Fasting and 2 hour postprandial glucose concentrations, total cholesterol, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly lower in the interactive education group than in the conventional education group. The proportion of patients that achieved target goals was significantly higher in the interactive education group.
CONCLUSION: The small-group educational method improved and re-established the existing group educational method. This finding suggests that the importance of education appears to be related to the method by which it is received rather than the education itself. Thus, the use of small-group educational methods to supplement existing educational methods established for diverse age levels should be considered in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achievement; Diabetes mellitus; Education

Year:  2011        PMID: 22247900      PMCID: PMC3253968          DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2011.35.6.580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab J        ISSN: 2233-6079            Impact factor:   5.376


  11 in total

1.  Study circles at the pharmacy--a new model for diabetes education in groups.

Authors:  A Sarkadi; U Rosenqvist
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1999-05

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life among adults with diabetes.

Authors:  Susan L Norris
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Developing a new generation of ongoing: Diabetes self-management support interventions: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Tricia S Tang; Mary Lou Gillard; Martha M Funnell; Robin Nwankwo; Ebony Parker; David Spurlock; Robert M Anderson
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.140

4.  Implementing an empowerment-based diabetes self-management education program.

Authors:  Martha M Funnell; Robin Nwankwo; Mary Lou Gillard; Robert M Anderson; Tricia S Tang
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.140

5.  The effect of metformin and intensive lifestyle intervention on the metabolic syndrome: the Diabetes Prevention Program randomized trial.

Authors:  Trevor J Orchard; Marinella Temprosa; Ronald Goldberg; Steven Haffner; Robert Ratner; Santica Marcovina; Sarah Fowler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Prevention of diabetes mellitus. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1994

7.  Cost and benefits of a multidisciplinary intensive diabetes education programme.

Authors:  J C Keers; H Groen; W J Sluiter; J Bouma; T P Links
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-12

9.  How our current medical care system fails people with diabetes: lack of timely, appropriate clinical decisions.

Authors:  Mayer B Davidson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 17.152

10.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Education as prescription for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: compliance and efficacy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Mi Yeon Kim; Sunghwan Suh; Sang-Man Jin; Se Won Kim; Ji Cheol Bae; Kyu Yeon Hur; Sung Hye Kim; Mi Yong Rha; Young Yun Cho; Myung-Shik Lee; Moon Kyu Lee; Kwang-Won Kim; Jae Hyeon Kim
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.376

2.  It's Still Not Too Late to Make a Change: Current Status of Glycemic Control in Korea.

Authors:  Sang Yong Kim
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.376

3.  Impact of ENPP1 K121Q on change of insulin resistance after web-based intervention in Korean men with diabetes and impaired fasting glucose.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kang; Sook Hee Sung; Yeon Ju Lee; Tae In Choi; Seung Jin Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Diabetes Camp as Continuing Education for Diabetes Self-Management in Middle-Aged and Elderly People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  So Young Park; Sun Young Kim; Hye Mi Lee; Kyu Yeon Hur; Jae Hyeon Kim; Moon Kyu Lee; Kang Hee Sim; Sang Man Jin
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.376

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.