Neema Lakshman1, W Matthew Petroll. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9057, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess how wound healing cytokines and the extracellular matrix (ECM) environment regulate the keratocyte mechanical phenotype. METHODS: Rabbit corneal keratocytes were plated within standard bovine or rat tail type I collagen matrices (2.5 mg/mL), compressed collagen matrices (approximately 100 mg/mL), or on collagen-coated dishes and cultured for up to 7 days in serum-free media, platelet derived growth factor BB (PDGF BB), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), TGFβ1, TGFβ2, or FGF2. F-actin, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and collagen fibrils were imaged using confocal microscopy. Cell morphology, local matrix reorganization, and global matrix contraction were quantified digitally. RESULTS: IGF and PDGF BB stimulated elongation of keratocytes and extension of dendritic processes within 3-D matrices, without inducing stress fiber formation or collagen reorganization. In contrast, treatment with TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 increased keratocyte contractility, as indicated by stress fiber formation and matrix compaction and alignment. This transformation was enhanced at higher cell densities within standard 3-D matrices, in which α-SMA was incorporated into stress fibers. In contrast, α-SMA was expressed within compressed 3-D matrices even at low cell density. FGF2 did not produce significant cytoskeletal or matrix reorganization in standard 3-D matrices; however, stress fibers were consistently expressed within compressed collagen matrices and on rigid two-dimensional substrates. Inhibiting Rho kinase blocked both TGFβ- and FGF2-induced stress fiber formation. CONCLUSIONS: Keratocytes cultured in IGF or PDGF BB maintain a quiescent mechanical phenotype over a range of matrix environments. In contrast, the mechanical phenotypes induced by FGF and TGFβ vary in response to the structural and/or mechanical properties of the ECM.
PURPOSE: To assess how wound healing cytokines and the extracellular matrix (ECM) environment regulate the keratocyte mechanical phenotype. METHODS:Rabbit corneal keratocytes were plated within standard bovine or rat tail type I collagen matrices (2.5 mg/mL), compressed collagen matrices (approximately 100 mg/mL), or on collagen-coated dishes and cultured for up to 7 days in serum-free media, platelet derived growth factor BB (PDGF BB), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), TGFβ1, TGFβ2, or FGF2. F-actin, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and collagen fibrils were imaged using confocal microscopy. Cell morphology, local matrix reorganization, and global matrix contraction were quantified digitally. RESULTS: IGF and PDGF BB stimulated elongation of keratocytes and extension of dendritic processes within 3-D matrices, without inducing stress fiber formation or collagen reorganization. In contrast, treatment with TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 increased keratocyte contractility, as indicated by stress fiber formation and matrix compaction and alignment. This transformation was enhanced at higher cell densities within standard 3-D matrices, in which α-SMA was incorporated into stress fibers. In contrast, α-SMA was expressed within compressed 3-D matrices even at low cell density. FGF2 did not produce significant cytoskeletal or matrix reorganization in standard 3-D matrices; however, stress fibers were consistently expressed within compressed collagen matrices and on rigid two-dimensional substrates. Inhibiting Rho kinase blocked both TGFβ- and FGF2-induced stress fiber formation. CONCLUSIONS: Keratocytes cultured in IGF or PDGF BB maintain a quiescent mechanical phenotype over a range of matrix environments. In contrast, the mechanical phenotypes induced by FGF and TGFβ vary in response to the structural and/or mechanical properties of the ECM.
Authors: James J Tomasek; Giulio Gabbiani; Boris Hinz; Christine Chaponnier; Robert A Brown Journal: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 94.444
Authors: Timothy D Blalock; Matthew R Duncan; Juan C Varela; Michael H Goldstein; Sonal S Tuli; Gary R Grotendorst; Gregory S Schultz Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Brian M Stramer; James D Zieske; Jae-Chang Jung; Jeffrey S Austin; M Elizabeth Fini Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mridula Vishwanath; Lisha Ma; Carol A Otey; James V Jester; W Matthew Petroll Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Dimitrios Karamichos; Celeste B Rich; Ramin Zareian; Audrey E K Hutcheon; Jeffrey W Ruberti; Vickery Trinkaus-Randall; James D Zieske Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jaya Rajaiya; Xiaohong Zhou; Irina Barequet; Michael S Gilmore; James Chodosh Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 2.416
Authors: Sara M Thomasy; Vijay Krishna Raghunathan; Hidetaka Miyagi; Alexander T Evashenk; Jasmyne C Sermeno; Geneva K Tripp; Joshua T Morgan; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Mary Ann Stepp; James D Zieske; Vickery Trinkaus-Randall; Briana M Kyne; Sonali Pal-Ghosh; Gauri Tadvalkar; Ahdeah Pajoohesh-Ganji Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Miguel Miron-Mendoza; Eric Graham; Pouriska Kivanany; Jonathan Quiring; W Matthew Petroll Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-03-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Daniel P Maruri; Miguel Miron-Mendoza; Pouriska B Kivanany; Joshua M Hack; David W Schmidtke; W Matthew Petroll; Victor D Varner Journal: Biophys J Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Britta Dreier; Sara M Thomasy; Rima Mendonsa; Vijay Krishna Raghunathan; Paul Russell; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 4.799