Literature DB >> 2224668

Hospital-based utilization management: a cross-Canada survey.

G Anderson1, S B Sheps, K Cardiff.   

Abstract

Utilization management attempts to measure, understand and, when appropriate, reduce hospital use. We conducted a telephone survey to determine the status of utilization management in Canadian hospitals. The sample comprised a random selection of 30% of acute-care hospitals with over 100 beds for adults in Ontario and Quebec and all such hospitals in the other provinces. Of the 123 chief executive officers contacted 99 (80%) claimed to have a utilization management program. Of those, 90 (91%) agreed to participate in an in-depth survey or to designate a senior administrator to be interviewed who was most knowledgeable about the program. High occupancy rates and funding issues were the most common environmental triggers for the development of utilization management programs; funding issues were listed more frequently by respondents in Ontario than by those elsewhere (p = 0.0008). Retrospective review alone was used in half of the hospitals, concurrent review or some mixed approach being used in the other half. Ontario and the Atlantic provinces were more reliant than the rest of the country on retrospective review alone (p = 0.0032). Most of the hospitals used peer review and education to stimulate corrective action. Of the respondents 67% indicated that the medical staff supported the utilization management program, and 53% reported that the program had a positive impact on the relationship between administrative and medical staff. Most of the respondents were unsure of the program's impact on the quality of care or the rate of unnecessary hospital admission. However, retrospective review alone was found to be less successful in reducing inappropriate utilization than either concurrent review or combined review (p = 0.0048).

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2224668      PMCID: PMC1452510     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  5 in total

1.  PSROs: their current status and their impact to date.

Authors:  A Dobson; J G Greer; R H Carlson; F A Davis; L E Kucken; B J Steinhardt; T P Ferry; G S Adler
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Does utilization review reduce unnecessary hospital care and contain costs?

Authors:  T M Wickizer; J R Wheeler; P J Feldstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Identifying and managing inappropriate hospital utilization: a policy synthesis.

Authors:  S M Payne
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Peer review organizations. Promises and potential pitfalls.

Authors:  P E Dans; J P Weiner; S E Otter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Private cost containment. The effects of utilization review programs on health care use and expenditures.

Authors:  P J Feldstein; T M Wickizer; J R Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-05-19       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Critical care audit.

Authors:  J A Vestrup
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Privileges for family physicians in urban hospitals: Part 1: Are we still part of the equation?

Authors:  R H Borkenhagen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A survey of medical quality assurance programs in Ontario hospitals.

Authors:  B Barrable
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  From physician to consumer: the effectiveness of strategies to manage health care utilization.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Maureen A Smith; Margaret K Davis
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Utilization management as a cost-containment strategy.

Authors:  Howard L Bailit; Cary Sennett
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1992-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.