Literature DB >> 22246139

Effects of dynamic-range compression on the spatial attributes of sounds in normal-hearing listeners.

Ian M Wiggins1, Bernhard U Seeber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Dynamic-range compression is routinely used in bilaterally fitted hearing devices. The objective of this study was to investigate how compression applied independently at each ear affects spatial perception in normal-hearing listeners and to relate the effects to changes in binaural cues caused by the compression for different types of sound.
DESIGN: A semantic-differential method was used to measure the spatial attributes of sounds. Eleven normal-hearing participants responded to questions addressing certainty of location, diffuseness, movement, image splits, and externalization of sounds. Responses were given on seven-point scales between pairs of opposing terms. Stimuli included speech and a range of synthetic sounds with varying characteristics. Head-related transfer functions were used to simulate a source at an azimuth of -60° or +60°. Three processing conditions were compared: (1) an unprocessed reference condition; (2) fast-acting, wide-dynamic-range compression operating independently at each ear; and (3) imposition of a static bias in interaural level difference (ILD) equivalent to that generated by the compression under steady state conditions. All processing was applied in a high-frequency channel above 2 kHz. The three processing conditions were compared separately in two bandwidth conditions: a high-pass condition in which the high-frequency channel was presented to listeners in isolation and a full-bandwidth condition in which the high-frequency channel was recombined with the unprocessed low-frequency channel.
RESULTS: Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to group related questions based on similarity of participants' responses. This led to the calculation of composite scores for four spatial attributes: "diffuseness," "movement," "image split," and "externalization." Compared with the unprocessed condition, fast-acting compression significantly increased diffuseness, movement, and image-split scores and significantly reduced externalization scores. The effects of compression were greater when listeners heard the high-frequency channel in isolation than when it was recombined with the unprocessed low-frequency channel. The effects were apparent only for sounds containing gradual onsets and offsets, including speech. Dynamic compression had a much more pronounced effect on the spatial attributes of sounds than imposition of a static bias in ILD.
CONCLUSIONS: Fast-acting compression at high frequencies operating independently at each ear can adversely affect the spatial attributes of sounds in normal-hearing listeners by increasing diffuseness, increasing or giving rise to a sense of movement, causing images to split, and affecting the externalization of sounds. The effects are reduced, but not eliminated, when listeners have access to undisturbed low-frequency cues. Sounds containing gradual onsets and offsets, including speech, are most affected. The effects arise primarily as a result of relatively slow changes in ILD that are generated as the sound level at one or both ears crosses the compression threshold. The results may have implications for the use of compression in bilaterally fitted hearing devices, specifically in relation to spatial perception in dynamic situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22246139     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823d78fd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  11 in total

1.  Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults.

Authors:  Claudia Freigang; Kristina Schmiedchen; Ines Nitsche; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cochlear Implantation in Cases of Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Subjective Benefit, Word Recognition, and Spatial Hearing.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Sarah A McCarthy; Andrea L Bucker; Ellen J Deres; Margaret E Richter; Nicholas J Thompson; Michael W Canfarotta; Brendan P O'Connell; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Listening through hearing aids affects spatial perception and speech intelligibility in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jens Cubick; Jörg M Buchholz; Virginia Best; Mathieu Lavandier; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perception of Auditory Distance in Normal-Hearing and Moderate-to-Profound Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Gilles Courtois; Vincent Grimaldi; Hervé Lissek; Philippe Estoppey; Eleftheria Georganti
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility and Sound Localization Abilities with Hearing Aids Using Binaural Wireless Technology.

Authors:  Iman Ibrahim; Vijay Parsa; Ewan Macpherson; Margaret Cheesman
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2012-12-21

9.  Time-Varying Distortions of Binaural Information by Bilateral Hearing Aids: Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Francisco A Rodriguez; Cory D F Portnuff; Matthew J Goupell; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Effects of Binaural Spatialization in Wireless Microphone Systems for Hearing Aids on Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Gilles Courtois; Hervé Lissek; Philippe Estoppey; Yves Oesch; Xavier Gigandet
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.