PURPOSE: To investigate the potential influences that affect visual acuity (VA) outcome in a clinic-based cohort of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for choroidal neovascularization. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: Patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD were prospectively recruited. A detailed questionnaire was given to patients at time of enrollment, to collect information relating to demographics, history of visual symptoms, visual acuity (VA), and treatment scheduling. Delay from symptoms to treatment ("Treatment delay") was measured in terms of weeks and analyzed in tertiles. Information pertaining to treatment outcomes was collected over a 6-month period. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five eyes of 185 patients were recruited into the study. Longer delay from first symptoms suggestive of CNV to first injection was a significant predictor (P=.015) of poorer treatment outcome, when controlling for age, sex, and baseline VA. Patients with a delay in treatment of 21 weeks or more compared to a delay of 7 weeks or less had an odds ratio of 2.62 (1.20, 5.68) for worsening vision after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing a longer delay between their first symptoms of CNV and their first anti-VEGF treatment have a significantly lower chance of improving vision at 6 months following anti-VEGF therapy. It is critical that this information reach those at potential vision loss from AMD, in order that prompt treatment may be instituted, to maximize the benefits of anti-VEGF treatment. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: To investigate the potential influences that affect visual acuity (VA) outcome in a clinic-based cohort of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for choroidal neovascularization. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS:Patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD were prospectively recruited. A detailed questionnaire was given to patients at time of enrollment, to collect information relating to demographics, history of visual symptoms, visual acuity (VA), and treatment scheduling. Delay from symptoms to treatment ("Treatment delay") was measured in terms of weeks and analyzed in tertiles. Information pertaining to treatment outcomes was collected over a 6-month period. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five eyes of 185 patients were recruited into the study. Longer delay from first symptoms suggestive of CNV to first injection was a significant predictor (P=.015) of poorer treatment outcome, when controlling for age, sex, and baseline VA. Patients with a delay in treatment of 21 weeks or more compared to a delay of 7 weeks or less had an odds ratio of 2.62 (1.20, 5.68) for worsening vision after treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Patients experiencing a longer delay between their first symptoms of CNV and their first anti-VEGF treatment have a significantly lower chance of improving vision at 6 months following anti-VEGF therapy. It is critical that this information reach those at potential vision loss from AMD, in order that prompt treatment may be instituted, to maximize the benefits of anti-VEGF treatment. Copyright Â
Authors: David S Boyer; Andrew N Antoszyk; Carl C Awh; Robert B Bhisitkul; Howard Shapiro; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ryan M Rich; Philip J Rosenfeld; Carmen A Puliafito; Sander R Dubovy; Janet L Davis; Harry W Flynn; Serafin Gonzalez; William J Feuer; Richard C Lin; Geeta A Lalwani; Jackie K Nguyen; Gaurav Kumar Journal: Retina Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: David M Brown; Peter K Kaiser; Mark Michels; Gisele Soubrane; Jeffrey S Heier; Robert Y Kim; Judy P Sy; Susan Schneider Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philip J Rosenfeld; David M Brown; Jeffrey S Heier; David S Boyer; Peter K Kaiser; Carol Y Chung; Robert Y Kim Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel F Martin; Maureen G Maguire; Gui-shuang Ying; Juan E Grunwald; Stuart L Fine; Glenn J Jaffe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ziad F Bashshur; Zeina A Haddad; Alexandre Schakal; Rola F Jaafar; Marc Saab; Baha' N Noureddin Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2007-12-11 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Peter K Kaiser; David M Brown; Kang Zhang; Henry L Hudson; Frank G Holz; Howard Shapiro; Susan Schneider; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: David M Brown; Mark Michels; Peter K Kaiser; Jeffrey S Heier; Judy P Sy; Tsontcho Ianchulev Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yanling Ouyang; Florian M Heussen; Pearse A Keane; Srinivas R Sadda; Alexander C Walsh Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Karen Curtin; Lauren H Theilen; Alison Fraser; Ken R Smith; Michael W Varner; Gregory S Hageman Journal: Hypertens Pregnancy Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 2.108
Authors: W M Amoaku; U Chakravarthy; R Gale; M Gavin; F Ghanchi; J Gibson; S Harding; R L Johnston; S P Kelly; S Kelly; A Lotery; S Mahmood; G Menon; S Sivaprasad; J Talks; A Tufail; Y Yang Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Lorah T Perlee; Aruna T Bansal; Karen Gehrs; Jeffrey S Heier; Karl Csaky; Rando Allikmets; Paul Oeth; Toni Paladino; Daniel H Farkas; P Lyle Rawlings; Gregory S Hageman Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 12.079