Literature DB >> 2224493

Brain responses to semantic incongruity in bilinguals.

S Ardal1, M W Donald, R Meuter, S Muldrew, M Luce.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials were examined in the first and second languages of bilinguals, and in monolinguals. Stimuli were anomalous sentences presented one word at a time on a CRT monitor. The principal dependent measure was the N400 component, and an accompanying frontal negativity, which provided an estimate of the amount of time the nervous system takes to determine the semantic incongruity of a given word. The results indicate that N400 latency is slightly, but significantly, delayed in bilinguals, with monolinguals having the shortest mean N400 latency, the first language of bilinguals next, and the second language of bilinguals longest. The frontal negativity varied in amplitude somewhat independently of the parietal N400. The amplitude of the frontal negativity was sometimes reduced in the second language, tending to be smaller in those subjects who used their second language the least. Neither N400 nor the frontal negativity varied as a function of age of acquisition of the second language. The results are discussed with reference to the relative automaticity of language in bilinguals, and the sensitivity of N400 to variations in the automaticity of language processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2224493     DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90011-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  27 in total

1.  What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  A Hahne
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

2.  Comprehending semantic and grammatical violations in Italian. N400 and P600 comparison with visual and auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Michela Balconi; Uberto Pozzoli
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-01

3.  ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in native and non-native readers of English.

Authors:  Sonja A Kotz; Phillip J Holcomb; Lee Osterhout
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-12-03

4.  Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension.

Authors:  Guillaume Thierry; Yan Jing Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Native and Non-native Speakers' Brain Responses to Filled Indirect Object Gaps.

Authors:  Anna Jessen; Julia Festman; Oliver Boxell; Claudia Felser
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

6.  The Role of Working Memory, Language Proficiency, and Learners' Age in Second Language English Learners' Processing and Comprehension of Anaphoric Sentences.

Authors:  Mohammad Nowbakht
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-04

7.  Influence of Second Language Proficiency and Syntactic Structure Similarities on the Sensitivity and Processing of English Passive Sentence in Late Chinese-English Bilinguists: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Xin Chang; Pei Wang
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-02

8.  Conflict Resolution in Sentence Processing by Bilinguals.

Authors:  Sylvain Moreno; Ellen Bialystok; Zofia Wodniecka; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 1.710

9.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of bilingual word processing.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Timothy T Brown; Katherine E Travis; Lusineh Gharapetian; Donald J Hagler; Anders M Dale; Jeffrey L Elman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Syntactic learning by mere exposure--an ERP study in adult learners.

Authors:  Jutta L Mueller; Regine Oberecker; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.