Literature DB >> 11523274

What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

A Hahne1.   

Abstract

German sentences which were either correct, contained a selectional restriction violation, or a word category violation were presented auditorily to 16 native speakers of German (L1 group) and to 16 native speakers of Russian, who had learned German after the age of 10 (L2 group). Semantic violations elicited an N400 effect for both groups, but with a reduced amplitude and a longer peak latency in the L2 group. Compared to correct sentences, sentences with a phrase structure violation elicited an early anterior negativity followed by a broad centro-parietal positivity in native speakers. By contrast, there was no differential modulation of the early anterior negativity in the L2 group. A late positivity was also elicited in the second language learners, but it was slightly delayed compared to that shown by native speakers. This pattern is discussed in terms of different degrees of automaticity with respect to the subprocesses involved in sentence comprehension.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11523274     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010490917575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  16 in total

1.  Cerebral organization in bilinguals: a PET study of Chinese-English verb generation.

Authors:  D Klein; B Milner; R J Zatorre; V Zhao; J Nikelski
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-09-09       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension.

Authors:  A Hahne; J D Jescheniak
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-04

3.  Processing of visually presented sentences in Mandarin and English studied with fMRI.

Authors:  M W Chee; D Caplan; C S Soon; N Sriram; E W Tan; T Thiel; B Weekes
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M W Chee; E W Tan; T Thiel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis. Early automatic and late controlled processes.

Authors:  A Hahne; A D Friederici
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Brain responses to semantic incongruity in bilinguals.

Authors:  S Ardal; M W Donald; R Meuter; S Muldrew; M Luce
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers.

Authors:  C M Weber-Fox; H J Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language.

Authors:  D Perani; E Paulesu; N S Galles; E Dupoux; S Dehaene; V Bettinardi; S F Cappa; F Fazio; J Mehler
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages.

Authors:  K H Kim; N R Relkin; K M Lee; J Hirsch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Brain processing of native and foreign languages.

Authors:  D Perani; S Dehaene; F Grassi; L Cohen; S F Cappa; E Dupoux; F Fazio; J Mehler
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-11-04       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  48 in total

1.  Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers.

Authors:  Casey Lew-Williams; Anne Fernald
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Processing lexical semantic and syntactic information in first and second language: fMRI evidence from German and Russian.

Authors:  Shirley-Ann Rüschemeyer; Christian J Fiebach; Vera Kempe; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in native and non-native readers of English.

Authors:  Sonja A Kotz; Phillip J Holcomb; Lee Osterhout
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-12-03

4.  Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension.

Authors:  Guillaume Thierry; Yan Jing Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Native and Non-native Speakers' Brain Responses to Filled Indirect Object Gaps.

Authors:  Anna Jessen; Julia Festman; Oliver Boxell; Claudia Felser
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

6.  Input Training Matters in L2 Syntactic Representation Entrenchment: Evidence from a Follow-Up ERP Study.

Authors:  Taiping Deng; Baoguo Chen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-06

7.  Influence of Second Language Proficiency and Syntactic Structure Similarities on the Sensitivity and Processing of English Passive Sentence in Late Chinese-English Bilinguists: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Xin Chang; Pei Wang
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-02

8.  Conflict Resolution in Sentence Processing by Bilinguals.

Authors:  Sylvain Moreno; Ellen Bialystok; Zofia Wodniecka; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 1.710

9.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of bilingual word processing.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Timothy T Brown; Katherine E Travis; Lusineh Gharapetian; Donald J Hagler; Anders M Dale; Jeffrey L Elman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Syntactic learning by mere exposure--an ERP study in adult learners.

Authors:  Jutta L Mueller; Regine Oberecker; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.