Literature DB >> 22244826

Primary treatment and prognostic factors of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Kung-Liahng Wang1, Ting-Chang Chang, Shih-Ming Jung, Chi-Hau Chen, Ya-Min Cheng, Hua-Hsi Wu, Wen-Shiung Liou, Shih-Tien Hsu, Yu-Che Ou, Lian-Shung Yeh, Hung-Cheng Lai, Chia-Yen Huang, Tze-Chien Chen, Chee-Jen Chang, Chyong-Huey Lai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aims were to investigate the treatment and clinicopathological variables in relation to prognosis in small cell neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (SCNECC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data of SCNECC patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I-IV treated between 1987 and 2009 at member hospitals of the Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (TGOG) were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: Of the 179 eligible patients, 104 were of FIGO stage I, 19 stage IIA, 23 stage IIB, 9 stage III, and 24 stage IV. The median failure-free survival (FFS) was 16.0 months, and the median cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 24.8 months. In multivariate analysis, FIGO stage and lymph node metastasis were selected as independent variables in stages I-IV. In stages IIB-IVB, primary treatment containing etoposide and platinum for at least 5 cycles (EP5+) (n=16) was associated with significantly better 5-year FFS (42.9% versus 11.8%, p=0.041) and CSS (45.6% versus 17.1%, p=0.035) compared to other treatments (n=40). Furthermore, concurrent chemoradiation with EP5+ (CCRT-EP5+) was associated with even better 5-year FFS (62.5% versus 13.1%, p=0.025) and CSS (75.0% versus 16.9%, p=0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: FIGO stage and lymph node metastasis are significant prognostic factors in SCNECC. In stages IIB-IVB, CCRT-EP5+ might be the treatment of choice, which could be also true for earlier stages. Despite limitations of a retrospective study spanning a long time period and heterogeneous managements, the results provide an important basis for designing future prospective studies.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22244826     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  36 in total

1.  Brachytherapy and survival in small cell cancer of the cervix and uterus.

Authors:  Alexander J Lin; Comron Hassanzadeh; Stephanie Markovina; Julie Schwarz; Perry Grigsby
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  (18)F-FDG PET in small-cell cervical cancer: a prospective study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Min-Yu Chen; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Feng-Yuan Liu; Chao-Yu Chen; Gigin Lin; Lan-Yan Yang; Yu-Bin Pan; Shih-Ming Jung; Ren-Chin Wu; Yi-Ting Huang; Jason Chien-Sheng Tsai; Tzu-Chen Yen; Chyong-Huey Lai; Ting-Chang Chang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Next-generation Sequencing Reveals Recurrent Somatic Mutations in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.

Authors:  Deyin Xing; Gang Zheng; John Kenneth Schoolmeester; Zaibo Li; Aparna Pallavajjala; Lisa Haley; Michael G Conner; Russell Vang; Chien-Fu Hung; Tzyy-Choou Wu; Brigitte M Ronnett
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Definitive pelvic radiation therapy improves survival in stage IVB neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: A NeCTuR study.

Authors:  Gloria Salvo; Anuja Jhingran; Preetha Ramalingam; Alejandra Flores Legarreta; Priya Bhosale; Naomi R Gonzales; Gary B Chisholm; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Combination therapy with topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab improves progression-free survival in recurrent small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  M Frumovitz; M F Munsell; J K Burzawa; L A Byers; P Ramalingam; J Brown; R L Coleman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Sequencing of mutational hotspots in cancer-related genes in small cell neuroendocrine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Michael Frumovitz; Jennifer K Burzawa; Lauren A Byers; Yasmin A Lyons; Preetha Ramalingam; Robert L Coleman; Jubilee Brown
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathological Factors Influencing Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shengwei Kang; Junxiang Wu; Jie Li; Qing Hou; Bin Tang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-03-09

8.  Isolated subcutaneous recurrence of high-grade neuroendocrine tumor of the cervix.

Authors:  Lia Bos; Alison Goulder; Lauren Prescott; Mirna Podoll; Michael Frumovitz; Alaina J Brown
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-05-07

9.  Comparison of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for FIGO2018 Stage IIIC1 Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Masahiro Kagabu; Takayuki Nagasawa; Shunsuke Tatsuki; Yasuko Fukagawa; Hidetoshi Tomabechi; Eriko Takatori; Yoshitaka Kaido; Tadahiro Shoji; Tsukasa Baba
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Prognostic factors and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the uterine cervix based on the FIGO 2018 staging system: a single-institution study of 172 patients.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Yang Sun; Li Chen; Lele Zang; Cuibo Lin; Yongwei Lu; Liang Lin; An Lin; Hu Dan; Yiyu Chen; Haixin He
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.